Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T11:55:00.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Andrew Large, The artificial language movement. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985. Pp. x + 239.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Humphrey Tonkin
Humphrey Tonkin
Affiliation:
Potsdam College of the State University of New York, Potsdam, NY 13676
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language in Society , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 1988 , pp. 282 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boulton, M. (1960). Zamenhof, creator of Eseranto. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Burney, P. (1962). Les langues internationales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. (1977). Sensible words: Linguistic practice in England 1640–1785. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. (1986). Esperanto and an international research context. In Tonkin, H. & Johnson-Weiner, K. (eds.), The idea of a universal language. (Report of the Fourth Annual Conference of the Center for Research and Documentation on World Language Problems.) New York: The Center. 97–107.Google Scholar
Forster, P. G. (1982). The Esperanto movement. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowlson, J. R. (1975). Universal language schemes in England and France 1600–1800. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapenna, I. (1964). Yes, Esperanto is the answer to the world language problem. (Research and Documentation Centre Doc. A/IV/4–6.) Rotterdam: Universal Esperanto Association.Google Scholar
Lins, U. (1973). La danĝera lingvo: Esperanto en la uragano de la persekutoj. Kyoti, Japan: L'omnibuso.Google Scholar
Piron, C. (1981). Esperanto: European or Asiatic language? (Esperanto Documents 22A.) Rotterdam: Universal Esperanto Association.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. (1979). The study of language in 17th-century England. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Shapiro, B. J. (1969). John Wilkins 1614–1672: An intellectual biography. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, M. M. (1982). Universal languages and scientific taxonomy in the seventeenlh century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tonkin, H. (1968). Code or culture: The case of Esperanto. Era (University of Pennsylvania) 4, 2: 5–21.Google Scholar
Waringhien, G. (1970). Plena ilustrita vortaro de Esperanto. Paris: Sennacieca Asocio Tutmonda.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1978). Lingvistikaj aspektoj de Esperanto. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.Google Scholar
Wood, R. E. (1979). A voluntary non-ethnic, non-territorial speech community. In Mackey, W. F. & Ornstein, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistic studies in language contact: Methods and cases. The Hague: Mouton. 433–50.Google Scholar
Wüster, E. (1931). Internationale Sprachnormung in der Technik, besonders in der Elektrotechnik. Berlin: VDI-Verlag.Google Scholar