Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-kw98b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-22T01:22:44.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kant’s Wolffianism: Comments on Karin de Boer’s Kant’s Reform of Metaphysics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2022

Stefanie Buchenau*
Affiliation:
Université Paris 8 Saint-Denis, Paris, France

Abstract

In her new book, Karin de Boer attempts to read Kant’s first Critique as a reform of a Wolffian project. My contribution contains several comments and questions that aim to further develop this stimulating approach to Kant. They concern (1) the affinities and disagreements between Kant and Wolff, regarding metaphysics, epistemology and method; (2) the place of Wolff’s students (in particular Mendelssohn) in De Boer’s narrative; and (3) the development of the dialogue between Wolff and Kant in the latter’s later writings.

Type
Author Meets Critics
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buchenau, Stefanie (2011) ‘Notions directrices et architectonique de la métaphysique. La critique kantienne de Wolff en 1763’. Astérion, 9 (consulted online on 18 June 2021, https://journals.openedition.org/asterion/2136).10.4000/asterion.2136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boer, Karin (2020) Kant’s Reform of Metaphysics: The Critique of Pure Reason Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108897983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Klaus (1935) Kant und die Ethik der Griechen. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (2001) De notionibus directricibus et genuine usu philosophiae primae, Gesammelte Werke, vol. 21.2. Ed. and trans. Gottlieb Friedrich Hagen. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (2019) Über den Unterschied zwischen einem systematischen und einem nicht-systematischen Verstand. Ed. and trans. Michael Albrecht. Hamburg: Meiner.10.28937/978-3-7873-3446-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar