Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:53:44.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of risk and vulnerability on predator mobbing by terns (Sterna spp.) and gulls (Larus spp.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2000

Danielle Clode
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, U.K. Present address: Department of Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
Johnny D. S. Birks
Affiliation:
The Vincent Wildlife Trust, 10 Lovat Lane, London EC3R 8DN, U.K.
David W. Macdonald
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

The extent to which anti-predator mobbing can be modified in response to new predators was investigated by examining the response of terns (Sterna hirundo and S. paradisaea) and gulls (Larus fuscus, L. argentatus and L. canus) to introduced mink Mustela vison, native otter Lutra lutra and rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus models in areas inhabited by mink and areas uninhabited by mink. Gulls and terns typically flock over predators of adult birds (a fleeing response), whilst diving at predators of chicks and eggs (an attacking response). Terns in mink-inhabited areas flocked over a model of a mink, but did not dive at it as much as they dived at otter and rabbit models. A stronger fleeing rather than attacking response suggests that adult terns perceive mink as a threat to themselves as well as to their chicks and eggs. Gulls, in comparison, dived at the mink model, indicating that mink are not perceived as a threat to the adults of these considerably larger species. Both gulls and terns showed a much lower level of response to mink in mink-free areas, suggesting that the type and extent of mobbing is altered through experience with predators and the level of risk associated with mobbing the predator.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)