Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:57:25.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The pollination ecology of the late-successional tree, Oroxylum indicum (Bignoniaceae) in Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

Tuanjit Srithongchuay ,
Sara Bumrungsri  and
Ekapong Sripao-raya
Tuanjit Srithongchuay
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkla, Thailand90112
Sara Bumrungsri*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkla, Thailand90112
Ekapong Sripao-raya
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkla, Thailand90112 Thailand Natural History Musuem, Kloang Luang, Phathumthani, Thailand
*
1Corresponding author. Email: sara_psu@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Although plant species that attract multiple species of pollinators predominate in tropical plant communities, pollination specialists appear to be at a greater advantage in tropical ecosystems in which pollinators are numerous and many plants flower synchronously. The present study determined the breeding system and legitimate pollinators of Oroxylum indicum Vent. in Songkhla and Patthalung Provinces, Thailand. Oroxylum indicum exhibits steady-state flowering, with one or two flowers per inflorescence opening each night. Flowers open in the evening and drop off shortly after midnight, while its bilabiate stigma is highly sensitive, and quickly close upon being touched. Oroxylum indicum is self-incompatible. Hand-cross pollination and open pollination yielded the highest pollination success (47.7% and 31.2% respectively, n = 7 trees). About 900 pollen grains are needed for initiating fruit set. It is confirmed that a fruit bat, Eonycteris spelaea, is the legitimate pollinator. Bats are responsible for all pollen load and the pollen load from only one visit is generally sufficient to initiate fruit set. Although Eonycteris spelaea is effective, it is an inefficient pollinator. Compared with plant species pollinated by multiple animal species, the likelihood of pollination failure resulting from the decline in populations of Eonycteris spelaea will be much more intense in Oroxylum indicum.

Keywords

effective pollinatorEonycteris spelaeapollination specializationself incompatiblestigma closure
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 24 , Issue 5 , September 2008 , pp. 477 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

BAKER, H. G. 1960. The adaptation of flowering plants to nocturnal and crepuscular pollinators. Quarterly Review of Biology 36:64–73.Google Scholar
BARRETT, S. C. H. & Harder, L. D. 1996. Ecology and evolution of plant mating. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:73–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BAWA, K. S. 1990. Plant-pollinator interactions in tropical rain forests. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 21:399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BITTENCOURT, N. S. & SEMIR, J. 2006. Floral biology and late-acting self-incompatibility in Jacaranda racemosa (Bignoniaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 54:315–324.Google Scholar
BULLOCK, S. H. 1985. Breeding system in the flora of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Biotropica 17:287–301.Google Scholar
BUMRUNGSRI, S., SRIPAORAYA, E. & LEELATIWONG, C. 2006. A quantitative analysis of plant community structure in an abandoned rubber plantations on Kho-Hong Hill, southern Thailand. Songklanakharind Journal of Science and Technology 28:479–491.Google Scholar
CORNER, E. J. H. 1988. Wayside trees of Malaya. The Malayan Nature Society, Kuala Lumpur. 861 pp.Google Scholar
CRUDEN, R. W. 2000. Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31:32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DAFNI, A. 1992. Pollination ecology, a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 250 pp.Google Scholar
FAEGRI, K. & VAN DER PIJL, L. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon Press, Oxford. 242 pp.Google Scholar
FENSTER, C. B., ARMBRUSTER, W. S., WILSON, P., DUDASH, M. R. & THOMSON, J. D. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35:375–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FLEMING, T. H. 1982. Foraging strategies of plant visiting bats. Pp. 287–325 in Kunz, T. H. (ed). Ecology of bats. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FLEMING, T. H. & SOSA, V. J. 1994. Effects of nectarivorous and frugivorous mammals on the reproductive success of plants. Journal of Mammalogy 75:845–851.Google Scholar
GENTRY, A. H. 1974. Flowering phenology and diversity in tropical Bignoniaceae. Biotropica 6:64–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GOULD, E. 1978. Foraging behavior of Malaysian nectar-feeding bats. Biotropica 10:184–193.Google Scholar
HARDER, L. D. & BARRETT, S. C. H. 1995. Mating costs of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373:512–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HEITHAUS, E. R. 1982. Coevolution between bats and plants. Pp. 327–367 in Kunz, T. H. (ed). Ecology of bats. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
HOPKINS, H. C. F. 1994. The Indo-Pacific species of Parkia (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae). Kew Bulletin 49:181–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JOHNSON, S. D. & STEINER, K. E. 2000. Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:140–143.Google Scholar
KRESS, W. J. & BEACH, H. J. 1994. Flowering plant reproductive systems. Pp. 161–182 in McDade, A. L., Bawa, K. S., Hespenheide, H. A. & Hartshorn, G. S. (eds.). La Selva, ecology and natural history of a neotropical rain forest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
LEKAGUL, B. & MCNEELY, J. E. 1988. Mammals of Thailand. (Second edition). Darnsutha Press, Bangkok. 758 pp.Google Scholar
MACHADO, C. I. & VOGEL, S. 2004. The north-east-Brazilian liana, Adenocalymna dichilum (Bignoniaceae) pollinated by bats. Annuals of Botany 93:609–613.Google Scholar
MARSHALL, A. G. 1983. Bats, flower and fruit: evolutionary relationships in the old world. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 20:115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MICKLEBURGH, S. M., HUTSON, A. M. & RACEY, P. A. 1992. Old World fruit bats – an action plan for their conservation. IUCN, Gland. 252 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MUCHHALA, N. 2006. The pollination ecology of Burmeistera (Campanulaceae) specialization and syndromes. American Journal of Botany 93:1081–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OLLERTON, J. 1998. Sunbird surprise for syndromes. Nature 394:726–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PARRISH, T. L. 2002. Krakatau: genetic consequences of island colonization. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Utrecht University, Utrecht. 145 pp.Google Scholar
RAMIREZ, N. 2004. Pollination specialization and time of pollination on a tropical Venezuelan plain: variations in time and space. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 145:1–16.Google Scholar
RICHARDS, P. W. 1996. The tropical rain forest. (Second edition). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 575 pp.Google Scholar
SOEPADMO, E. & EOW, B. K. 1976. The reproductive biology of Durio zibethinus Murr. Gardens’ Bulletin, Singapore 29:25–33.Google Scholar
SOMANATHAN, H. & BORGES, R. M. 2001. Nocturnal pollination by the carpenter bee Xylocopa tenuiscapa (Apidae) and the effect of floral display on fruit set of Heterophragma quadriloculare (Bignoniaceae) in India. Biotropica 33:78–89.Google Scholar
START, A. N. 1974. The feeding biology in relation to food sources of nectarivorous bats (Chiroptera: Macroglossinae) in Malaysia. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen.247 pp.Google Scholar
START, A. N. & MARSHALL, A. G. 1976. Nectarivorous bats as pollinators of trees in West Malaysia. Pp. 141–150 in Burley, J. & Styles, B. T. (eds.). Tropical trees: variation, breeding and conservation in tropical forest trees. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
THOMSON, J. D. & PLOWRIGHT, R. C. 1980. Pollen carryover, nectar rewards, and pollinator behavior with special reference to Diervilla lonicera. Oecologia 46:68–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VAN DER PIJL, L. 1934. The relations between flowers and higher animals. Hong Kong Nature 5:176–181.Google Scholar
WASER, N. M., CHITTIKA, L., PRICE, M. V., WILLIAMS, N. M. & OLLERTON, J. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043–1060.Google Scholar
ZHANG, Z.-Y. & SANTISUK, T. 1998. Bignoniaceae. Flora of China 18:213–225.Google Scholar