Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:54:25.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grasses of the Precambrian Shield region in eastern lowland Bolivia. II. Life-form and C3–C4 photosynthetic types

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Timothy J. Killeen  and
Paul N. Hinz
Timothy J. Killeen
Affiliation:
Missouri Botanical Garden, PO Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA
Paul N. Hinz
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A life-form classification from Neotropical Gramineae is proposed for 113 native species from eastern lowland Bolivia. A factor analysis was performed on a correlation matrix of 51 vegetative attributes to identify ‘character suites,’ which were then used as the basis for the classification. The principal types are arboreal, liana, shrub-like, forb-like, bunch grass with basal foliage, bunch grass with basal and caulescent foliage, caespitose annuals, elongate rhizomes, turf grass, stoloniferous, and decumbent (the last category is further divided into subgroups: -perennial, -indefinite, -floating aquatic, and -vine-like). A key component of the life-form classification is the morphology of leaf blades, with five major patterns recognized: elongate and inrolled, elongate and conduplicate, elongate and flat with an attenuate base, short and broad with an amplexicaule base, and short and broad with a pseudopetiole.

The distribution and relative abundance of three major photosynthetic categories were compared with life-form and habitat preference. Photosynthetic type of individual species was identified based on leaf anatomy. C4-(XyMS −) species predominated in cerradao, cerrado, campo rupestre, valleyside campos, and seasonally inundated savanna, as well as on granite outcrops. C4-(XyMS + ) species were relatively rare in all habitats, but were significantly more abundant in the xeric microenvironments of granite outcrops. C3 species predominated in semi-deciduous forest and increased in relative abundance in wetland habitats. Caespitose annuals and bunch grass species were predominantly C4 type, while arboreal and liana species were uniformly C3 type. Grasses classified as decumbent or shrub-like were predominantly C3 type, while rhizomatous, stoloniferous, and forblike grasses were a mixture of C3 and C4 type.

The intent of the study was to group morphological characteristics objectively in order to derive a life-form classification specific for the Gramineae. Comparisons of the relative abundance of the various life-forms in a broad range of habitat types provide a descriptive assessment of the adaptive value of these characteristics.

Keywords

autecologyBoliviacerradoGramineaeKranz anatomyNeotropicssavannawetlands
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , November 1992 , pp. 409 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Barkman, J. J. 1988. New systems of plant growth forms and phenological plant types. Pp. 9–44 in Werger, M. J. A., van der Aart, P. J. M., During, H. J., & Verhoeven, J. T. A. (eds). Plant form and vegetation structure. SPB Academic Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
Barnes, P. W., Tiezsen, L. L. & Ode, D. J. 1983. Distribution, production, and diversity of C3 and C4 dominated communities in a mixed prairie. Canadian Journal of Botany 61:741–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, E. O. 1981. Macroclimate and plant forms: an introduction to predictive modelling in phytogeography. Dr W. Junk, The Hague, 258 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K. S. & Prance, G. T. 1987. Soils and vegetation. Pp. 19–25 in Whitmore, T. C. & Prance, G. T. (eds). Biogeography and Quaternary history in tropical America. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brown, W. V. 1977. The Kranz syndrome and its subtypes in grass systcmaties. Memoirs of Torrey Botanical Club 23:1–90.Google Scholar
Caldwell, M. M., Dean, T. J., Nowak, R. S., Dzurec, R. S. & Richards, J. H. 1983. Bunchgrass architecture, light interception, and water use efficiency: assessment by fiber optic point quadrats and gas exchange. Oecologia 59:178–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chazdon, R. L. 1976. Ecological aspects of the distribution of C4 grasses in selected habitats of Costa Rica. Biotropica 10:265–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, L. G. & Fisher, J. B. 1987. Vegetative morphology of grasses: shoots and roots. Pp. 37–48 in Soderstrom, T. R., Hilu, K. W., Campbell, C. S. & Barkworth, M. E. Grass systematics and evolution. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. Google Scholar
Descoings, B. 1975. Les types morphologiques et biomorphologiques des especes graminoides dans les formation herbeuses tropicales. Naturalia Monspeliensa: série botanique 25:23–35.Google Scholar
Ehleringer, J. R. & Mooney, H. A. 1978. Leaf hairs: effects on physiological activity and adaptive value to a desert shrub. Oecologia 37:183–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, R. P. 1976. A procedure for standardizing comparative leaf anatomy in the Poaceae. I. The leaf blade as viewed in transverse section. Bothalia 12:65–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. P., Vogel, J. C. & Fuls, A. 1980. Photosynthetic pathways and the geographic distribution of grasses in South West Africa/Namibia. South African Journal of Science 76:307–314.Google Scholar
Facelli, J. M. 1988. Response to grazing after nine years of cattle exclusion in a flooding pampa grassland. Vegetatio 78:21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fliervoet, L. M. & Werger, M. J. A. 1984. Canopy structure and microclimate of two wetland grassland communities. The New Phytologist 96:115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givnish, T. J. 1978. On the adaptive significance of compound leaves, with particular reference to tropical trees. Pp. 351–380 in Thomlinson, P. B. & Zimmermann, M. H. (eds). Tropical trees as living systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Givnish, T. J. 1986. Biomechanical constraints on crown geometry in forest herbs. Pp. 525–579 in Givnish, T. J. (ed.). On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, F. W. & Shaw, R. B. 1983. Grass systematics (2nd edition), Texas A & M Press, College Station, Texas. 397 pp.Google Scholar
Hattersley, P. W. 1986. Variations in photosynthetie pathway. Pp. 49–64 in Soderstrom, T. R., Hilu, K. W., Campbell, C. S. & Barkworth, M. E. Grass systematics and evolution. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. Google Scholar
Hattersley, P. W. & Watson, L. 1975. Anatomical parameters for predicting photosynthetie pathways of grass leaves: The ‘maximum lateral cells count’ and the ‘maximum cells distant count.’ Phytomorphology 25:325–259.Google Scholar
Killeen, T. J. 1990. The grasses of Chiquitania, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 77:125–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killeen, T. J. 1991. The effect of grazing on native Gramineae in Conceptión, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Tropical Grassland 25:12–19.Google Scholar
Killeen, T. J. & Hinz, P. 1992. Grasses of the Precambrian Shield region in eastern lowland Bolivia. I. Habitat preferences. Journal of Tropical Ecology 8:389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killeen, T. J. & Kirpes, C. C. 1991. A new species and new combination in Ichnanthus from South America (Gramineae: Paniceae). Novon 1:177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killeen, T. J., Loumann, B. T. & Grimwood, T. 1990. La ecología paisajística de Concepción y Lomerío, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Ecologia en Bolivia 16:1–45.Google Scholar
Klink, C. A. & Joly, C. A. 1989. Identification and distribution of C3 and C4 grasses in open and shaded habitats in Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Biotropica 21:30–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, F. A. 1966. The bamboos – a fresh perspective. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 347 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, C. R. 1960. Anatomy of monocotyledons. I. Gramineae . Clarendon Press, Oxford. 731 pp.Google Scholar
Mueller-Dombois, D. & Ellenberg, H. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 547 pp.Google Scholar
Niklas, K. J. & O'Rourke, T. D. 1982. Growth patterns of plants that maximize vertical growth and minimize inlernal stresses. American Journal of Botany 69:1367–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. 1981. Nutritional differences between tropical and temperate pastures. Pp. 143–156 in Morley, F. W. (ed.). Grazing Animals. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Pearcy, R. W. & Ehleringer, J. 1984. Comparative ecophysiology of C3 and C4 plants. Plant, Cell, and Environment 7:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohl, R. W. 1980. Family No. 15 Gramineae. In Burger, W. E. (ed.). Flora Costaricensis. Fieldiana, New Series 4: 1 608.Google Scholar
Putz, F. E. 1984. The natural history of lianas on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecology 65:1713–1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raunkiaer, C. 1937. Plant life forms. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 104 pp.Google Scholar
Sarmiento, G. 1984. The ecology of Neotropical savannas. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 235 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skiles, J. W. 1984. A review of animal preference. Pp. 153–213 in National Resource Council/National Academy of Sciences, Developing strategies for rangeland management . Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Warren Wilson, J. 1967. Stand structure and light penetration. III. Sunlit foliage area. Journal of Applied Ecology 2:383–390.Google Scholar