Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T21:59:30.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diversity of soil fauna in the canopy and forest floor of a Venezuelan cloud forest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Maurizio G. Paoletti ,
R. A. J. Taylor ,
Benjamin R. Stinner ,
Deborah H. Stinner  and
David H. Benzing
Maurizio G. Paoletti
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
R. A. J. Taylor*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Woosler, Ohio, USA
Benjamin R. Stinner
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Woosler, Ohio, USA
Deborah H. Stinner
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Woosler, Ohio, USA
David H. Benzing
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Oberlin, USA
*
1Department of Entomology, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio Slate University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Arboreal and terresterial soil and lilter were sampled for macro-and microinvertebrates at two locations in a Venezuelan cloud forest. Fauna were most abundant in forest floor soil and associated litter. However, media suspended in the canopy and particularly those trapped in bromeliad shoots were most densely populated, while the diversities of the arboreal and terrestrial soil fauna were indistinguishable. Rates of leaf litter decomposition in the arboreal and terrestrial soils were similar, but the arboreal soils contained higher concentrations of mineral nutrients and carbon. Implications of these findings for the definition of soil in humid tropical forests, and related differences between temperate and tropical forests are discussed. The similarities in diversity and differences in species composition between arboreal and terrestrial soil fauna raise questions concerning the evolution of tropical soil fauna, as well as the estimate of global biotic diversity.

Keywords

cloud forestdensitydiversityepiphytic bromeliadssoil faunaVenezeula
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , August 1991 , pp. 373 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Benzing, D. H. 1980. The Biology of Bromeliads. Mad River Press, Eureka, California, 305 pp.Google Scholar
Benzing, D. H. & Renfrew, A. 1974. The mineral nutrition of Bromeliaceae. Botanical Gazette 235:281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzing, D. H. & Seeman, J. 1978. Nutritional piracy and host decline: a new perspective on the epiphyte-host relationship. Selbyana 2:133–148.Google Scholar
Dahnke, L. M. (ed.). 1988. Recommended chemical soil test procedures. North Central Regional Publication No. 221 (Revised); North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 499:36 pp.Google Scholar
Delamare-Debouteville, C. 1948. Étude quantitative du peuplement animal des sols suspendu et des epiphytes en forêt tropicale. Comples Rendus de l'Academie du Science 226:1544–1546.Google Scholar
van der Drift, J. 1963. A comparative study of the soil fauna in forests and cultivated land on sandy soils in Suriname. Studies on the Fauna of Suriname. and the Other Guyanas 6:1–43.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. A. & Fletcher, K. 1970. Assessment of terrestrial invertebrate populations. Pp. 57–66 in Proceedings of the Symposium on Methods of Study in Soil Ecology, UNESCO, Geneva.Google Scholar
Erwin, T. L. 1983. Tropical forest canopies: the last biotic frontier. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 29:14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb, P. J. & Edwards, P. J. 1982. Studies of mineral cycling in a montane rain forest in New Guinea. Journal of Ecology 70:623–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, O. 1986. La Selva nublada de Rancho Grande Parque Nacional Henri Pittier. Pp. 1–15 in Pittier, H. & Huber, O. (eds). Fondo Editorial Acta Cientifica Venzolana.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, D. W. 1970. A note on the use of ignition loss as a means for the approximate estimation of soil bulk density. Journal of Ecology 58:297–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempton, R. A. 1979. The structure of species abundance and measurement of diversity. Biometrics 35:307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempton, R. A. & Taylor, L. R. 1974. Log-series and log-normal parameters as diversity discriminants for the Lepidoptera. Journal of Animal Ecology 43:381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempton, R. A. & Taylor, L. R. 1976. Models and statistics for species diversity. Nature 262:818–820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavelle, P. & Kohlmann, B. 1984. Étude quantitative de la macrofaune du Sol dans une forêt tropicale humide du Mexique (Bonampak, Chiapas). Pedobiologia 27:377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, S. & Dock, C. F. 1982. Analysis of the leaf litter arthropod fauna of a lowland tropical evergreen forest site (La Selva, Costa Rica). Review of Tropical Biology 30:27–34.Google Scholar
Nadkarni, N. M. 1981. Canopy roots: convergent evolution in rain forest nutrient cycles. Science 214:1023–1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadkarni, N. M. 1984. Epiphyte biomass and nutrient capital of a neotropical elfin forest. Biotropica 16:249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palacio-Vargas, J. G. 1982. Microarthropodos asociados a Bromeliaceas. Zoologia Neotropica 1:535–545.Google Scholar
Paoletti, M. G. 1989. Life strategics of isopods and ‘soil invertebrates’ in Venezuela. Monitore Zool. Ital. Monogr. 4:435–453.Google Scholar
Paoletti, M. G., Dreon, L. A., Stinner, B. R. & Stinner, D. H. 1990. Distribuzione della pedofauna e nutrienti nella selva neotropicale. La foresta di nubi venezuelana. Nova Thalassia. In press.Google Scholar
Pearson, D. L. & Derr, J. 1986. Seasonal patterns of lowland forest floor Arthropod abundance in southwestern Peru. Biotropica 18:244–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, E. C. 1977. Mathematical Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Pimm, S. L. & Redfearn, A. 1988. The variability of population densities. Nature 334:613–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, R. L. 1987. Apogeotropic roots in an Amazonian rainforest. Science 235:1062–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, J. H. 1985. A comparison of terrestrial and marine ecological systems. Nature 313:355–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, E. V. J. 1980. Studies on the biomass and productivity in a series of montane rain forests in Jamaica. Journal of Ecology 68:573–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. B. 1964. Patterns in the Balance of Nature. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 1987. Arboreal ant fauna of Peruvian Amazonian forests: a first assessment. Biotropica 19:245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinck, A. 1986. A fragilidad de los suelos. Pp. 31–45 in Pittier, H. & Huber, O. (eds). Fondo Editorial Acta Cientifica VenzolanaGoogle Scholar