Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T15:00:42.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dispersal, fruit utilization and seed predation of Dysoxylum gaudichaudianum in early successional rainforest, Krakatau, Indonesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Robert J. Whittaker  and
Bryan D. Turner
Robert J. Whittaker
Affiliation:
School of Geography, University of Oxford, Mansfield Road, Oxford 0X1 3TB, UK
Bryan D. Turner
Affiliation:
Division of Life Sciences, King's College London, Campden Hill Road, Kensington, London, W8 7AH, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dysoxylum gaudichaudianum is an important canopy tree on the Krakatau Islands, and its ecology is of significance to an understanding of successional dynamics. It is abundant on Panjang and Sertung, but only locally common on Rakata. A study was undertaken of three aspects of its seed ecology in July/August 1992. The chief dispersers of D. gaudichaudianum are suggested here to be birds, with two species of pigeon and a bulbul prominent as fruit feeders over a short observation period. Bird activity dislodges large numbers of fruits and seeds which fall to the ground where they form a resource available to other animals. It was observed that seeds of D. gaudichaudianum suffer varying levels of attrition on the forest floor, with 40% of the total sample lost over a 12-day period, compared with 23% which had germinated. When mature, opening fruits develop a fishy aroma, which is attractive to insects. They hasten the decay process and release the seeds. The soft, rotting tissues of fallen fruits support a small, short-lived successional insect community. After about five days on the forest floor only the seeds and the outer fruit coat remain. Despite the abundance of fruit of this species during the dry season and its obvious attraction tó frugivorous birds, D. gaudichaudianum has still colonized only a small fraction of the near-coastal lowlands of Rakata.

Keywords

dispersalDysoxylumfrugivoresKrakatauisland colonizationrainforestseed predationsuccession
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , May 1994 , pp. 167 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Backer, C. A. & Bakhuizen Van Den Brink, R. C. Jr. 1963–1968. The flora of Java. 3 volumes. NVP Noordhoff, Groningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Bush, M. B. 1986. Some effects of physical processes on the redevelopment of the forests of Krakatau. Pp. 57–76 in Bush, M. B., Jones, P. & Richards, K. (eds). The Krakatoa Centenary Expedition 1983. Final report. Miscellaneous Series No. 33. Department of Geography, University of Hull, Hull.Google Scholar
Bush, M. B. & Whittaker, R. J. 1991. Krakatau: Colonization patterns and hierarchies. Journal of Biogeography 18:341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, M. B., Whittaker, R. J. & Partomihardjo, T. 1992. Forest development on Rakata, Panjang and Sertung: contemporary dynamics (1979–1989). Geojournal 28:185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheek, M. R. 1989. The systematic seed anatomy of the Meliaceae – with particular reference to the seed-coat of the Melioideae. Unpubl. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Dammerman, K. W. 1948. The fauna of Krakatau 1883–1933. Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie Wetenchappen Afdeling Natuurkunde (Tweede Sectie) 44:1–594.Google Scholar
Disney, R. H. L. 1986. Morphological and other observations on Chonocephalus (Phoridae) and phylogenetic implications for the Cyclorrhapa (Diptera). Journal of the Zoological Society of London 210:77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docters Van Leeuwen, W. M. 1935. The dispersal of plants by fruit-eating bats. Gardens Bulletin, Straits Settlements 9:58–63.Google Scholar
Docters Van Leeuwen, W. M. 1936. Krakatau 1883–1933. Annales du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg 46–47.Google Scholar
Herrera, C. M. 1981. Are tropical fruits more rewarding to dispersers than temperate ones? American Naturalist 118:896–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, F. R. L. 1989. Pigeons as seed predators and dispersers of figs in a Malaysian lowland forest. Ibis 131:521–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, M. & Leighton, D. R. 1983. Vertebrate responses to fruiting seasonality within a Bornean rain forest. Pp. 181–196 in Sutton, S. L., Whitmore, T. C. & Chadwick, A. C. (eds). Tropical rain forest: ecology and management. Special publications series of the British Ecological Society No. 2. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, J. 1988. Field guide to the birds of Java and Bali. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta. 390 pp.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. G. 1985. Old World phytophagous bats (Megachiroptera) and their food plants: a survey. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 83:351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, D. R. (ed.). 1986. Seed dispersal. Academic Press, Sydney. 322 pp.Google Scholar
O'Dowd, D. J. & Lake, P. S. 1991. Red crabs in rain forest, Christmas Island: removal and fate of fruits and seeds. Journal of Tropical Ecology 7:113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pannell, C. M. & Koziot, M. J. 1987. Ecological and phytochemical diversity of arillate seeds in Aglaia (Meliaceae): a study of vertebrate dispersal in tropical trees. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 316:303–333.Google Scholar
Partomihardjo, T., Mirmanto, E. & Whittaker, R. J. 1992. Anak Krakatau's vegetation and flora circa 1991, with observations on a decade of development and change. Geojournal 28:233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, D. W. 1981. Tropical frugivorous birds and their food plants: a world survey. Biotropica 13:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suthers, R. A. 1970. Vision, olfaction, taste. Pp. 265–309 (chapter 5) in Wimsatt, W. A. (ed.). Biology of Bats, Volume II. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Tagawa, H. 1992. primary succession and the effect of first arrivals on subsequent development of forest types. Geojournal 28:175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagawa, H., Suzuki, E., Partomihardjo, T. & Suriadarma, A. 1985. Vegetation and succession on the Krakatau Islands, Indonesia. Vegetatio 60:131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terborgh, J. 1990. Seed and fruit dispersal – commentary. Pp. 181–190 in Bawa, K. S. & Hadley, M. (eds). Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
Tidemann, C. R., Kitchener, D. J., Zann, R. A. & Thornton, I. W. B. 1990. Recolonization of the Krakatau Islands and adjacent areas of West Java, Indonesia by bats (Chiroptera) 1883–1986. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 328:121–130.Google Scholar
Van Der Pijl, L. 1957. The dispersal of plants by bats. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 6:291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, B. M. 1973. Chemoreception. Pp. 389–115 (Chapter 6) in Farner, D. S. & King, J. R. (eds). Avian Biology, Vol III. Academic Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. J., Bush, M. B. & Richards, K. 1989. Plant recolonization and vegetation succession on the Krakatau Islands, Indonesia. Ecological Monographs 59:59–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. J., Walden, J. & Hill, E. J. 1992. Post-1883 ash fall on Panjang and Sertung and its ecological impact. Geojournal 28:153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt-Smith, J. 1953. The vegetation of Jarak Island, Straits of Malacca. Journal of Ecology 41:207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zann, R. A., Walker, M. V., Adhikerana, A. S., Davison, G. W., Male, E. B. & Darjono, . 1990a. The birds of Krakatau Islands (Indonesia) 1984–86. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 328:29–54.Google Scholar
Zann, R. A., Male, E. B. & Darjono, . 1990b. Bird colonization of Anak Krakatau, an emergent volcanic island. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 328:95–121.Google Scholar