^{page 138 note 1} JRAS. 1915, pp. 63–89, 405–55.Google Scholar

^{page 138 note 2} Especially as he rejects Weber's views on Maya.

^{page 140 note 1} It is clear that Iran was not at once or early won to Zoroastrianism, even if we believe, as I do, that the Magians were Zoroastrian (JRAS. 1915, pp. 790–9).Google Scholar

^{page 142 note 1} It is clear that the equation of the Mauryan palace and the palace of Darius rests on wholly insufficient evidence on the archæological side. There is no a priori reason to deny its possibility, but it must be established by archæology, not by such evidence as adduced by Dr. Spooner.