^{page 316 note 1} I see reasons for thinking that kip retains its original meaning of “ten”. See below, p. 332.

^{page 316 note 2} Also in Chandangsi and Byangsi.

^{page 316 note 3} Vide The Mikirs, p. 78.Google Scholar

^{page 316 note 4} See below, p. 328.

^{page 316 note 5} Part prefixes.

^{page 317 note 1} See Grammar by Rev. F. W. Savidge.

^{page 317 note 2} See below, p. 328.

^{page 317 note 3} Ethnographically Phadang and Khangoi belong to the Tangkhul group of villages.

^{page 320 note 1} See p. 334.

^{page 320 note 2} They belong with greater probability to the Khat group.

^{page 321 note 1} With Bhrāmu dē and Thāksya dī. Thāmī, diware.

^{page 321 note 2} I note that these forms are “apparently connected with the forms in the Mon Khmer group of languages” (LSR., vol. iii, pt. iii, p. 335).

^{page 322 note 1} The ordinary form is ni.

^{page 322 note 2} Forbes, , Comparative Grammar, p. 119.Google Scholar

^{page 324 note 1} Or jokhai.

^{page 324 note 2} Alternative form bku.

^{page 325 note 1} Forbes, , Comparative Grammar, p. 120.Google Scholar

^{page 325 note 2} Does this mean “hand-two”? Khut = hand in several dialects.

^{page 326 note 1} I am not so sure of this. Tak and tik probably are only prefixes.

^{page 327 note 1} Bong is a ten base. These forms probably mean “one from ten”.

^{page 328 note 1} UBG., p. 682.

^{page 328 note 2} Uses chip for ten and som for higher numerals.

^{page 328 note 3} In higher numbers only.

^{page 329 note 1} But see above as to hem and its possible relationship with the som group.

^{page 330 note 1} The Lusheis, p. 226.Google Scholar

^{page 332 note 1} tu = chu = ten.

^{page 333 note 1} The change of the base (11–19) is notable. Phew is the regular base. Khad is used for 11–19.

^{page 334 note 1} UBG., p. 626.

^{page 335 note 1} See vol. iii, pt. ii, p. 197, quoting A. W. Davis.