Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T23:27:23.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Unknown Co-Founders of Buddhism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Extract

Research in old Eastern literary remains may yet come upon materials throwing new light on the beginning and first development of the movement which, in course of time, came to be called Buddhism. The only works, as yet in our possession, in which we may discern certain archaic records of this most early stage are, as we know, the first part or Mahā-vagga of the Vinaya Piṭaka and one or two portions of the five Nikāyas. As chronicles these do not give us all the light we fain would have. Those, especially of the Vinaya are a number of fragments relating to what led up to the founding of the “Order”, and to certain early stages in its progress. The narrative is always in very slight outline; much would seem either to have been forgotten, or suppressed, as not relevant to the formal registering of some Vinaya statute, and why it came to be. We get the impression that we are reading about persons and places which, for the compilers, are just names, bound up, it is clear, with an ancient and venerated tradition, but not belonging to any actual memories either in their possession or even in their own preceding generations. The places named do not seem to be places known. A few persons emerge, two in high, a few others in low relief. These are, respectively, the founder and his chief rival and adversary, then three laypatrons—two kings and a merchant—also the first layconvert, the founder's family, a few other converts, lastly a few associates who here and there appear as fellow-teachers.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 195 note 1 Theratherīgāthā and Apadāna.

page 195 note 2 Majjhīma, No. 35; Saṃyutta, iii, 124: a death bed conversation.

page 198 note 1 E.g. M., i, 304; iii, 29; g., iv, 379.

page 199 note 1 Dīgha, ii, 151.

page 200 note 1 Cf. the style in which Oldenberg tells it, Buddha.

page 201 note 1 Sa-attha-vāha; D-, ii, 39; and Apadāna, p. 80; Satthavahagga, etc.

page 203 note 1 Majjhima, i, p. 227 (sutta 35).

page 205 note 1 M., iii, 6; Maggakkhāyī ‘ham, brahmaṇa!

page 206 note 1 Odātaka. I am not happy about the word. Perhaps vādaka, theorist.

page 208 note 1 Ang., i, 24. “Of the Sisters” is a careless slip in my Psalms of the Brethren, possibly due to an error in my only transcript of the Corny., a MS. no longer in my hands.