^{page 659 note 1} But see commentary under GÍR.LAL-ú-tú.

^{page 660 note 1} The numbers in thick type are those of the lines of the transcription.

^{page 660 note 2} Yale Oriental Series, Babylonian Texts.

^{page 662 note 1} According to Professor Langdon.

^{page 664 note 1} University of Pennsylvania. The Museum. Publications of the Babylonian Section.

^{page 664 note 2} The Babylonian Expedition of the University of Pennsylvania, Series A : Cuneiform Texts.

^{page 664 note 3} Cp. Clay, Morg. II, p. 19.

^{page 665 note 1} According to Professor Langdon.

^{page 665 note 2} So far as I know.

^{page 665 note 3} See note on 1. 17.

^{page 665 note 4} Lit. “together with ”.

^{page 666 note 1} See p. 663.

^{page 666 note 2} See Kohler and Peiser, Aus dem Babylonischen Rechtsleben, I, p. 1 f.

^{page 666 note 3} The išqu is a species under the genus zittu.

^{page 666 note 4} The contract is dated in Kislev.

^{page 667 note 1} See Meissner, Babylonien und Assyrien, II, 395.

^{page 667 note 1} More accurately : “the (percentage on the) share.”

^{page 668 note 1} Augapfel, Babylonische Bechtsurkunden.

^{page 668 note 2} Brünnow, A Classified List.

^{page 668 note 3} See Augapfel, BR. p. 111 a.

^{page 669 note 1} According to Langdon.

^{page 669 note 2} And i-pal-là ḫ, 20, 24.

^{page 670 note 1} Clay treats it as a derivative of zâzu “to divide ”. This is obviously a slip on his part.

^{page 670 note 2} Cp. also Morg. II, 50, 17.

^{page 670 note 3} Disproving Clay's treatment of the word as Sumerian : ḪA.RA.RA = ragâniu.

^{page 671 note 1} Cp. i-Šal-ṭu-ma = išallatuma Morg. II, 53, 7 ; and ta-šal-tu 6, 4. June, 1925.