No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Remarks on Dr. Vogel's Note
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Miscellaneous Communications
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1910
References
Page 1315 note 1 There was a doubt regarding the vowel of the second syllable.
Page 1315 note 2 In addition to Dr. Vogel's remarks, I have before me an inkimpression of the record, which he kindly sent, made (I think) by Pandit Radha Krishna.
Page 1315 note 3 With the Kārttikādi expired year, the details, falling in the hot season, place the record in b.c. 33.
Page 1316 note 1 Luders, , List of Brāhmī Inscriptions, Ep. Ind., vol. 10, appendix, No. 51Google Scholar.
Page 1316 note 2 For rājya-saṃ, = rājya-saṃvatsarē. I follow Professor Luders in reading sam, on the assumption that he has an impression or estampage which shows it: but the published lithograph gives sa; and an omission of the anusvāra would be quite natural.
Page 1316 note 3 Gupta Inscriptions, p. 43, line 6.
Page 1316 note 4 Lüders, List of Brāhmī Inscriptions, No. 22.