No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Processes of the circulation of Chinese wares in the Middle East during the Abbasid-Chinese ceramic exchange, eighth–tenth centuries ce
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2023
Abstract
This article examines the different mechanisms of the circulation of Chinese ceramics in the Middle East during the Abbasid-Chinese ceramic exchange during the eighth–tenth centuries ce. Although trade has been used conveniently to denote the circulation of Chinese wares in the Abbasid Caliphate, it is not the only mechanism that existed. There were also other possible processes of circulation, such as ceramics sent as tributes, diplomatic gifts, and samples, and secondary distribution through looting and pilgrimage. Not all Chinese wares shipped to the Middle East were luxury goods. Different types of Chinese wares had different functions and commercial and aesthetic values in the Middle East. It is an oversimplification to describe the circulation of Chinese wares in the Middle East as merely the result of the luxury goods trade.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Asiatic Society
References
1 G. D. Mumford, ‘International Relations between Egypt, Sinai, and Syria-Palestine during the Late Bronze Age to Early Persian Period (dynasties 18–26: c.1550–525 B.C.): A Spatial and Temporal Analysis of the Distribution and Proportions of Egyptian(izing) Artefacts and Pottery in Sinai and Selected Sites in Syria-Palestine’, (unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Toronto, 1998), p. 2.
2 Renfrew, C., ‘Trade as an action at a distance: questions of integration and communication’, in Ancient Civilization and Trade. School of American Research Advanced Seminar Series, (eds) Sabloff, J. and Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. (Albuquerque, 1975), p. 5Google Scholar.
3 Smith, M., ‘The archaeology of ancient state economics’, Annual Review of Anthropology 33 (2004), p. 84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Curtin, P., Cross-cultural Trade in World History. Studies in Comparative World History (Cambridge, 1984), p. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Polanyi, K., ‘The economy as instituted process’, in Trade and Market in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory, (eds) Polanyi, K., Arensberg, C. and Pearson, H. (Glencoe, 1957), p. 266Google Scholar.
6 K. Polanyi, ‘Traders and trade’, in Ancient Civilization and Trade, (eds) Sabloff and Lamberg-Karlovsky, p. 133.
7 Beaujard, P., ‘The Indian Ocean in Eurasian and African world-systems before the sixteenth century’, Journal of World History 16.4 (2005), p. 412CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 Cahill, N., Household and City Organisation at Olynthus (New Haven, CT, 2001), pp. 112–113Google Scholar.
9 Renfrew, ‘Trade as an action at a distance’, pp. 42–43, 48–51. Renfrew, C. and Bahn, P., Archaeology (New York, 2008), p. 374Google ScholarPubMed. Stark, B. and Garraty, C. P., ‘Detecting marketplace exchange in archaeology: a methodological review’, in Archaeological Approaches to Market Exchange in Ancient Societies, (eds) Stark, B. and Garraty, C. P. (Colorado, 2010), p. 34Google Scholar.
10 Wink, A., Al-Hind: The Making of the Indo-Islamic world. Volume I: Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam, Seventh–Eleventh Centuries (Leiden, 1991), p. 66Google Scholar.
11 Ibid., pp. 67–85.
12 Smith, ‘The archaeology of ancient state economics’, p. 84. Beaujard, ‘The Indian Ocean in Eurasian and African world-systems before the sixteenth century’, p. 415.
13 G. Feinman and C. Garraty, ‘Preindustrial markets and marketing: archaeological perspectives’, Annual Review of Anthropology 39 (2010), p. 178.
14 J. Hawkes and S. Wynne-Jones, ‘India in Africa: trade goods and connections of the late first millennium’, L'Afrique orientale et l'océan Indien: réseaux d’échanges et globalisation, June 2015, http://journals.openedition.org/afriques/1752 (accessed 3 October 2022).
15 K. Hirth, ‘The distributional approach. A new way to identify marketplace exchange in the archaeological record’, Current Anthropology 39.4 (1998), p. 455.
16 Ibid.
17 Ibid.
18 Ibid., p. 456. Smith, ‘The archaeology of ancient state economics’, p. 90.
19 Hirth, ‘The distributional approach’, p. 460.
20 Ibid., p. 459. M. Fulford, ‘Approaches to quantifying Roman trade: response’, in Quantifying the Roman Economy. Methods and Problems, (eds) A. Bowman and A. Wilson (Oxford, 2009), p. 258.
21 Polanyi, ‘Traders and trade’, p. 146.
22 Stark and Garraty, ‘Detecting marketplace exchange in archaeology’, p. 36.
23 R. Maclean and T. Insoll, ‘Archaeology, luxury and the exotic: the examples of Islamic Gao (Mali) and Bahrain’, World Archaeology 34.3 (2003), p. 559.
24 Ibid., p. 562.
25 J. B. Fleisher, ‘Housing the market: Swahili merchants and regional marketing on the eastern African coast, seventh to sixteenth centuries AD’, in Archaeological Approaches, (eds) Stark and Garraty, pp. 155–156. Stark and Garraty, ‘Detecting marketplace exchange in archaeology’, p. 36.
26 Li Sijing 李嗣京 and Wang Qinruo 王欽若, Ce Fu Yuan Gui 册府元龟, Wuxiutang 五绣堂. See Appendix 1.
27 T. Mackintosh-Smith and J. Montgomery, Two Arabic Travel Books: Accounts of China and India and Mission to the Volga, (eds and trans) A. Al-Sirafi and A. Ibn-Faḍlān (New York, 2014), pp. 84–85.
28 A. Lane, Early Islamic Pottery (London, 1947), p. 10.
29 R. Kauz, Aspects of the Maritime Silk Road: From the Persian Gulf to the East China Sea (Wiesbaden, 2010), p. 108.
30 Al-Tabari (trans.) and C. Bosworth, The History of al-Ṭabarī. Vol. 30: The ’Abbasid Caliphate in Equilibrium: The Caliphates of Musa al-Hadi and Harun al-Rashid A.D. 785–809/A.H. 169–193 (New York, 1989), p. 251.
31 Zhao Qinggang 赵庆钢 and Zhang Zhizhong 张志忠, Xing Kiln in its Millennium 千年邢窑 (Beijing, 2007), pp. 8–9.
32 Feng Xianming 冯先铭, Chinese Ceramics 中国陶瓷 (Shanghai, 2001), p. 329.
33 W. Wen, ‘Chinese ceramics in the Islamic world from the eighth to tenth centuries CE’, (unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Oxford, 2018), pp. 55, 73, 90, 94, 106, 111 and 131.
34 Zheng Jianming 郑建明 and Shen Yueming 沈岳明, The Secret Colour Yue Ware. Secret Colour Ware of the Tang and Five Dynasties from Housi'ao Kilns in Shanglinhu Area 秘色越窑，上林湖后司岙窑址出土唐五代秘色越器 (Beijing, 2017), p. 7.
35 Personal correspondence with Nigel Wood.
36 Zheng Jianming 郑建明 and Shen Yueming 沈岳明, The Secret Colour Yue Ware, p. 24.
37 Ibid., p. 11.
38 According to Nigel Wood, Chris Doherty, and Ma Hongjiao's analysis of some Secret Colour ware fragments, Secret Colour ware has almost the same glaze and body compositions as normal Yue greenware.
39 F. Sarre, Die Keramik von Samarra (Berlin, 1925), pp. 57–58. In Herzfeld's Finds Journal of the excavations of Samarra, these Secret Colour ware fragments were registered under I-N No. 1136–1140.
40 B. Gyllensvärd, ‘Recent finds of Chinese ceramics at Fostat I’, Bulletin Östasiatiska museet (1973), p. 97.
41 See details in Wen, ‘Chinese ceramics’, p. 207 and Appendix 6. Excavations of an Abbasid mosque in al-Ain, UAE, also discovered Dusun ware sherds.
42 A. Williamson, ‘Survey of excavations in Iran, 1969–70’, Iran 9 (1971), p. 177.
43 T. Harrisson, ‘Dusun jars: from Mayfair to Sabah’, The Sarawak Museum Journal xii.25–26 (1965), p. 69.
44 Huang Ying 黄莹, ‘Guangdong celadon on the Tang Maritime Silk Road. Research on Guanchong kilns in Xinhui, Guangdong 2014 唐代海上丝绸之路上的广东青瓷, 2014 年广东新会关冲窑址和馆藏实物调查记’, Silk Road 丝绸之路 V (2016), p. 247.
45 Liu Chengji 刘成基, ‘Guanchong kilns in Xinhui, Guangdong Province 广东省新会官冲古窑址’, Cultural Relics 文物 6 (2000), p. 41.
46 E. Ströber, The Collection of Chinese and Southeast Asian Jars (Martaban, Martavanen) at the Princessehof Museum, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands (2016), https://www.princessehof.nl/img/uploads/jars_research_Eva.pdf, p. 43, (last accessed 4 May 2018).
47 Ibid., p. 45.
48 Huang Ying, ‘Guangdong celadon on the Tang Maritime Silk Road’, p. 255.
49 M. Flecker, ‘A ninth-century Arab shipwreck in Indonesia: the first archaeological evidence of direct trade with China’, in Shipwreck, Tang Treasures and Monsoon Winds, Exhibition catalogue, National Museum of Asian Art (Washington DC and Singapore, 2011), p. 110, https://asia.si.edu/research/exhibition-catalogues/shipwrecked-catalog/ (accessed 3 October 2022).
50 J. Zarins and A. Zahrani, ‘Recent archaeological investigations in the southern Tihama plain: the sites of Athar and Sihi’, Atlal 9 (1985), p. 88.
51 D. Whitehouse, ‘Excavations at Siraf. Third interim report’, Iran 8 (1970), p. 5.
52 R. Krahl, ‘Green wares of southern China’, in Shipwreck, Tang Treasures and Monsoon Winds, p. 185.
53 Wen, ‘Chinese ceramics’, p. 205. Chinese greenware (celadon) was found in 70 sites, including Murwab; whiteware in 42 sites; Dusun ware in 40 sites; and Changsha ware in 29 sites throughout the studied area in the Middle East. Murwab in modern Qatar has a greenware sherd, now in the National Museum of Qatar. This site was not included in the author's research in 2018. For the quantities and types of Chinese ceramic finds in each site, see Wen, ‘Chinese ceramics’, Chapters 3 and 5.
54 Ibid., p. 266.
55 M. Pirazzoli-t'Serstevens, ‘La céramique chinoise de Qalʽat al Ṣuḥâr’, Arts Asiatiques 43 (1988), p. 87.
56 A. Stein, Archaeological Reconnaissance in North-western India and South-eastern Iran (London, 1937), p. 151.
57 Wen, ‘Chinese ceramics’, p. 106 and Appendix 7. In Fustat, for example, Tadanori has identified 2,069 pieces of Chinese whiteware and 941 pieces of Yue greenware which could date to the period from the eighth to tenth centuries ce. At the British Museum, there are around 421 pieces of Yue greenware, 328 pieces of whiteware, 265 pieces of Dusun ware, and 225 pieces of Changsha ware from the eighth to tenth centuries ce.
58 S. Priestman, ‘Settlement and Ceramics in Southern Iran: An Analysis of the Sasanian and Islamic Periods in the Williamson Collection’, (unpublished Master's dissertation, Durham University, 2005), p. 307.
59 Ibid., p. 307.
60 Ibid.
61 Ibid., pp. 307–308.
62 Ibid.
63 Ibid.
64 Ibid., p. 307.
65 Ibid., pp. 307–308.
66 Based on the Siraf ceramic finds at the British Museum.
67 Ibid., pp. 307–308.
68 Y. Tadanori, ‘Chinese porcelain from Fustat based on research from 1998–2001’, Transactions of the Oriental Ceramic Society 76 (2013), p. 4.
69 S. Rashid, Darb Zubaydah: The Pilgrim Road from Kufa to Mecca (Riyad, 1980), p. 280.
70 Ibid., p. 307.
71 C. Wilkinson, Nishapur: Pottery of the Early Islamic Period (New York, 1973), p. 257.
72 Henan Cultural Relics and Archaeology Institute 河南省文物考古研究所, Gongyi Huangye Kilns 巩义黄冶窑 (Beijing, 2016), p. 17.
73 See more details in Wen, ‘Chinese ceramics’, p. 272.
74 For the debate on the Samarra Horizon blue painted whiteware and its Chinese counterpart, see W. Wen, ‘Preconceptions on Samarra Horizon, green splashed ware and blue painted ware revisited through Chinese ceramic imports, eighth–tenth centuries ce’, Journal of Material Cultures in the Muslim World (forthcoming 2021).
75 In Herzfeld's Finds Journal of Samarra, Inventory Nos. 565, 784, 838, 839, 850, 900, 909 include Chinese splashed ware fragments. Inventory Nos. 565 and 850 were found in the Harem. Inventory No. 784 was obtained as hadiyyah (gift).
76 Northedge, A., The Historical Topography of Samarra (London, 2007), p. 135Google Scholar.
77 Ibid., p. 133.
78 Wen, ‘Chinese ceramics’, p. 159.
79 A. Rougeulle, ‘Medieval trade networks in the western Indian Ocean (8th–14th cent.): some reflections from the distribution pattern of Chinese imports in the Islamic world’, in Tradition and Archaeology, Early Maritime Contacts in the Indian Ocean. Proceedings of the International Seminar Techno-Archaeological Perspectives of Seafaring in the Indian Ocean 4th cent. B.C.–15th cent. A.D. February 28th–March 4th 1994, (eds) H. P. Ray and J.-F. Salles (New Delhi, 1996), p. 164.
80 Ibid., p. 175.
81 Rashid, Darb Zubaydah, pp. 81 and 280.
82 J. Knudstad, ‘The Darb Zubayda project 1396/1976’, Atlal 1 (1977), p. 41.
83 Rashid, Darb Zubaydah, p. 329.
84 Ibid., p. 280.
85 Ibid., p. 90.
86 Ibid., pp. 90–91 and 93.
87 Ibid., p. 295.
88 Kawatoko, M. and Shindo, Y., Artifacts of the Islamic Period Excavated in the Rāya/al-Ṭūr Area, South Sinai, Egypt (Tokyo, 2009), p. 3Google Scholar.
89 T. Mikami, ‘The ceramic trade in late Tang and Five Dynasties period 晚唐、五代时期的陶瓷贸易’, Wenbo 文博 2 (1988), pp. 58–59.
90 Leisten, T., Excavation of Samarra (Mainz am Rhein, 2003), p. 81Google Scholar.