^{page 42 note 1} I am indebted for help to Professor Burrow and Professor Turner, and to Dr. W. S. Allen for information on Rajasthani.

^{page 42 note 2} Sen, S.. “A comparative Grammar of Middle Indo-Aryan,” Indian Linguistics, vol. xii, 1951, p. 110Google Scholar.

^{page 42 note 3} Smith, H., in J.A., ccxl, pp. 169 ff.Google Scholar, however, goes back to pre-Vedic, differentiating between a proto-Prakrit *-s-i-ti and the ordinary Indo-Aryan -syati.

^{page 42 note 4} Turner, R. L.. “The phonetic weakness of terminational elements in Indo-Aryan,” JRAS., 1927Google Scholar. “The future stem in Asoka,” BSOS., vi, 1930–1932Google Scholar.

^{page 42 note 5} Bloch, J., Les Inscriptions d'Asoka (collection E. Senart), Paris, 1950Google Scholar.

^{page 43 note 1} The dāsai of the Uttarādhyayanasūtra, XVIII, 20, of Charpentier's edition is a mistake for dīsai, present indicative passive of √dṛś.

^{page 44 note 1} Gray, L. H., “Observations on Middle Indian Morphology,” BSOS., viii (1935–1937)Google Scholar.

^{page 44 note 2} Das Saptaśatakam des Hāla, Weber, A., Leipzig, 1881Google Scholar.

^{page 44 note 3} Nitti-Dolci, L., Les grammairiens prakrits, Paris, 1938Google Scholar.

^{page 44 note 4} Denecke, , Mitteilungen über Digambara Texte, Festgabe H. Jacobi, Bonn, 1926Google Scholar.

^{page 44 note 5} Mehendale, , Historical Grammar of Inscriptional Prakrits, Poona, 1948Google Scholar.

^{page 45 note 1} Laber, J., Über das Vajjālaggaṃ des Jayavallabha, Leipzig, 1919Google Scholar.

^{page 45 note 2} Alsdorf, L., Apabhraṃśa Studien, Hamburg, 1937Google Scholar.

^{page 45 note 3} Modi, M. C., Apabhraṃśapāṭhāvalī, Ahmadabad, 1935Google Scholar. Modi, M. C. and Bhayani, , Introduction to the Paumasirīcariu by Dhāhila, edited in Jain, Singhi Series, 1943Google Scholar.

^{page 45 note 4} Upadhye, , Joinditdeva's Paramátmaprakāśa and Yogasāra, Bombay, 1937Google Scholar.

^{page 45 note 5} Modi, M. C., Caturmukha Suayambhu ane Tribhuvana Suayambhu, Bhāratīya vidyā I, pt. 3, Bombay, 08, 1940Google Scholar.

^{page 46 note 1} Vaidya, , Mahāpurāṇa, Bombay, 1937Google Scholar.

^{page 46 note 2} Vaidya, , Jasaharacariu, Karanja, 1933Google Scholar.

^{page 46 note 3} Alsdorf, , Harivaṃśapurāṇa, Hamburg, 1936Google Scholar.

^{page 46 note 4} Jain, Hiralal, Karakaṇḍacariu, Karanja, 1934Google Scholar.

^{page 46 note 5} Dr. Allen suggests a more cautious interpretation of the Old Rajasthani forms, on account of the soundchange -s- > -h- (voiceless) in some dialects of Marwari, the speakers of which write -s- not -h-. But since this voiceless -h- is based, as he points out, on earlier -s- and not on -h-, this interpretation would still prove the point for the popular language of the west in the Apabhraṃśa period and show the secondary nature of the modern conditions in Rajasthani.

^{page 47 note 1} Tagare, , Historical Grammar of Apabhraṃśa, Poona, 1948Google Scholar.

^{page 47 note 2} Jacobi, H., Paumacariya, Bhavnagar, 1914Google Scholar.

^{page 47 note 3} Alsdorf, L., “The Vasudevahiṇḍi, a specimen of archaic Jain Māhārāshṭrī,” BSOS., viii, 1935–1937Google Scholar.

^{page 47 note 4} Dhūrtākhyāna of Haribhadra, ed. Upadhye, N., Singhi Jain Series, BombayGoogle Scholar.

^{page 48 note 1} Jacobi, , Bhavisattakahā, Introduction, p. 28, Munich, 1918Google Scholar.

^{page 48 note 2} Pischel, , Grammatik der Prakritspraehen, § 527, Strassburg, 1900CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

^{page 48 note 3} Tessitori, , Notes on the grammar of the Old Western Rajasthani, I.A., 1914–1916Google Scholar.

^{page 48 note 4} Modi, M., “The Bhāvanāsandhiprakaraṇaṃ of Jayadevamuni,” ABORI. xi, 1929Google Scholar.

^{page 49 note 1} Pischel, , Materialien zur Kenntnis des Apabhraṃśa, Berlin, 1902Google Scholar.

^{page 49 note 2} Krause, C., Nāsaketarī Kathā, an old Rajasthani tale, Leipzig, 1925Google Scholar.

^{page 49 note 3} Hertel, J., Über das Suvābahuttarī Kathā, Festschrift E. Windisch, Leipzig, 1914Google Scholar.

^{page 49 note 4} Cf. H. Smith's article (loc. cit.) for a different explanation. He postulates separate pre-Vedic origins for the -a- and -i- forms.

^{page 50 note 1} Upadhye, A. N., Līlāvaī. A romantic Kāvya in Māhārāṣṭrī Prakrit of Kouhala, Singhi Jain Series, 1949Google Scholar.

^{page 51 note 1} Dhar, L., Padumāvatī. A linguistic study of the sixteenth-century Awadhi (Hindi), London, 1948Google Scholar.

^{page 51 note 2} Saksena, B., “The verb in the Rāmāyan of Tulsī Dās,” Allahabad Univ. Studies, 1926Google Scholar.

^{page 51 note 3} Chaudhuri, N., Studies in the Apabhraṃśa texts of the Ḍākārṇava, Calcutta, 1940Google Scholar. Shahidullah, Les chants mystiques de Kānha et de Saraha.

^{page 51 note 4} Chatterji, , Origin and development of the Bengali language, Calcutta, 1926Google Scholar.

^{page 51 note 5} Haldar, , “Vidyāpati the Maithili poet and his language,” J. Dep. Lett., Calc., 1930Google Scholar. Saksena, , “The language of the Kīrtilatā,” Indian Linguistics, vGoogle Scholar.

^{page 51 note 6} Grierson, , “The Pārijāta Haraṇa of Umāpati Upadhyāya” (J. Bihar and Orissa Oriental Research Society, 1917)Google Scholar.

^{page 52 note 1} Lüders, , Bruchatücke indischer Dramen, Berlin, 1911Google Scholar.

^{page 52 note 2} Pischel, , Grammatik der Prakritsprachen, p. 363Google Scholar.

^{page 53 note 3} Tulpule, S. G., Yādavakālīna Marāṭhī Bhāṣā,, Bombay, 1942Google Scholar.