Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T20:26:01.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development without Decolonisation? Hong Kong's Future and Relations with Britain and China, 1967–1972

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2013

CHI-KWAN MARK
CHI-KWAN MARK*
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London, chi-kwan.Mark@rhul.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At a time when the United Kingdom accelerated decolonisation and slowly embraced Europe, London gradually lost the means and the will to fulfil its responsibilities to Hong Kong up until the expiry of the New Territories Lease in 1997. Although the immediate cause of this pessimistic mind-set was the leftist riots in 1967, the factors underlying despondency in London had to do with developments before 1967, namely Hong Kong's growing economic prosperity and administrative autonomy from London since the late 1950s, and beyond Hong Kong itself, the global implications of Britain's withdrawal from East of Suez and entry into the European Economic Community by the early 1970s. By 1972 the process of the “decolonisation” of Hong Kong was well underway. Although the British deemed the time unsuitable to initiate formal negotiation with the then Chinese government, they were prepared to take “informal soundings” concerning Hong Kong's future when a new pragmatic leadership emerged and before the crisis of confidence ensued nearer 1997.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 315 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, for example, White, N. J., Business, Government and the End of Empire: Malaya 1942–57 (Kuala Lumpur, 1996)Google Scholar; Stockwell, S., The Business of Decolonization: British Business Strategies in the Gold Coast (Oxford, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Burroughs, P. and Stockwell, A. J. (eds.), Managing the Business of Empire: Essays in Honour of David Fieldhouse (Portland, Ore, 1988)Google Scholar.

2 An earlier version of this paper was presented to a workshop on Hong Kong at the University of York on 4 July 2012. I wish to thank the organisers and participants of the workshop as well as the anonymous reviewers of this journal for their constructive criticisms.

3 Memorandum by Stewart for Ministerial Committee on Hong Kong (hereafter MCHK), K (69)1, “Hong Kong: Long Term Study”, 28 March 1969, CAB 134/2945, The National Archives (hereafter TNA), Kew, Surrey, United Kingdom.

4 For assessments of the Hong Kong question prior to 1967, see Mark, C-K., “Defence or Decolonisation? Britain, the United States, and the Hong Kong Question in 1957”, The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 33: 1 (January 2005), pp. 51–72 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mark, C-K., “Lack of Means or Loss of Will? The United Kingdom and the Decolonization of Hong Kong, 1957–1967”, The International History Review, 31: 1 (March 2009), pp. 45–71 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Cheung, G. K-W., Hong Kong's Watershed: The 1967 Riots (Hong Kong, 2009), pp. 95–99 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Also see Bickers, R. and Yep, R. (eds.), May Days in Hong Kong: Riot and Emergency in 1967 (Hong Kong, 2009)Google Scholar.

6 Yep, R. and Lui, T-L., “Revisiting the Golden Era of MacLehose and the Dynamics of Social Reforms”, China Information, 24: 3 (2010), pp. 249–272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Nan, S. and Nan, Z., Zhou Enlai shangping [The Life of Zhou Enlai] (Changchun, 1997), pp. 812–814 Google Scholar; Jin, Y., Zhonggong Xianggang zhengce miwen shilu [A Secret Record of the Chinese Communist Party's Hong Kong Policy] (Hong Kong, 1998), pp. 2–5 Google Scholar.

8 “A Comment on the Statement of The Communist Party of the U.S.A.”, Renmin Ribao Editorial, 8 March 1963 (Beijing, 1963), p. 13.

9 Cui, Q., Wo suo qinli de ZhongSu dalunzhan [My Experience of the Sino-Soviet Great Polemics] (Beijing, 2009), pp. 145–148 Google Scholar.

10 See Note on “Status of Hong Kong – Chinese Attitude”, in Wallace to Poynton, 2 December 1963, CO 1030/1674; Higham to Trench, 24 August 1964, FO 371/175888, TNA.

11 Cabinet Memorandum, Report of officials’ committee, C(60)35, 24 Feb. 1960, in British Documents on the End of Empire (hereafter BDEE), series A, vol. iv: The Conservative government and the end of empire, 1957–1964, pt. 1, (eds.) R. Hyam and W. R. Louis (London, 2000), pp. 87–107; Annex to report, “Forecast of Constitutional Development in Remaining Dependent Territories”, 24 April 1962, in BDEE, vol. iv, pt. 2, pp. 672–688.

12 Wallace to Poynton, 2 December 1963, CO 1030/1674; Note on “Status of Hong Kong – Chinese Attitude”, ibid., TNA.

13 Pepper, S., Keeping Democracy at Bay: Hong Kong and the Challenge of Chinese Political Reform (Lanham, MD, 2008), pp. 139, 144–145 Google Scholar.

14 Memorandum by Chief of Staff (hereafter COS) Committee, 29(54)1, 15 April 1954, CAB 128/27; Defence Committee (57)2nd meeting, 27 February 1957, CAB 131/18; COS to Chief of Defence Staff, COS 1546/8/4/65, 8 April 1965, DEFE 11/537, TNA.

15 OPD (66)33rd meeting, 22 July 1966, DEFE 11/537, TNA.

16 Galsworthy to Cass, 8 September 1966, DEFE 13/534; Memorandum by Lee, 19 July 1966, DEFE 11/537; Memorandum by Lee for OPD, OPD (66)133, 15 Dec. 1966, CAB 148/29; Carter to Hall/Godden, 12 May 1967, FCO 40/137, TNA.

17 On the British handling of the 1967 riots, see Cheung, Hong Kong's Watershed; Bickers and Yep (eds.), May Days in Hong Kong.

18 Ma, J., Waijiaobu Wenhua Dageming jishi [The Cultural Revolution in the Foreign Ministry of China] (Hong Kong, 2004), pp. 155–163 Google Scholar.

19 Li, P. (et al.), Zhou Enlai nianpu, 1949–1976 [The Chronicle of Zhou Enlai, 1949–1976], Vol. 3 (Beijing, 1997), pp. 155, 169Google Scholar.

20 See, for example, Hopson to Brown, no. 12S, 6 June, reprinted as FC 1/6, 12 June 1967, FCO 21/204; “The Present Situation in China”, Paper by Far Eastern Department, enclosed in Memorandum, Bolland to de la Mare, 8 June 1967, FCO 21/11, TNA.

21 Note by Secretary of MCHK, K(67)1, 14 July 1967, CAB 134/2945, TNA.

22 Interim Report for MCHK, K(67)2, 21 July 1967, CAB 134/2945; Minutes of MCHK, K(67)1st meeting, 24 July 1967, ibid., TNA.

23 Memorandum, Thomas to Wilson, 23 August 1967, PREM 13/1458; CC(67)54, 7 September 1967, CAB 128/42, TNA.

24 See Schenk, C. R., “The Empire Strikes Back: Hong Kong and the Decline of Sterling in the 1960s”, Economic History Review, 57: 3 (2004), pp. 561–570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Hong Kong Tourist Association Annual Report 1967/8 (Hong Kong, 1968), p. 21; The New York Times, 10 September 1967.

26 For a survey of the Hong Kong press coverage of the 1967 riots, see Lee, A. Y. L., “The Role of Newspapers in the 1967 Riot: A Case Study of the Partisanship of the Hong Kong Press”, in Press and Politics in Hong Kong: Case Studies from 1967 to 1997, (ed.) So, C. Y. K. and Chan, J. M. (Hong Kong, 1999), pp. 33–63 Google Scholar.

27 The South China Morning Post, 11 and 19 June 1967; Ming Pao Daily News, 18 and 19 May 1967; Sing Tao Jih Pao Daily, 14 July 1967.

28 Hong Kong Tourist Association Annual Report 1967/8, p. 11; Hong Kong Report for the Year 1967 (Hong Kong, 1968), p. 162.

29 Foreign newspapers’ views were summarised in Ching Pao, 12 July 1967. Also see Tin Tin Daily News, 23 July 1967 and Ta Kung Pao, 20 July 1967.

30 The New York Times, 16 July 1967. Also see 9 July and 19 July 1967.

31 State Department to Hong Kong, no. 197313, 18 May 1967, RG 59, Central Foreign Policy Files, 1967–1969, Political and Defense, Box 2176, United States National Archives (hereafter USNA), College Park, Maryland, USA.

32 Memorandum, Jenkins to Rostow, 21 July 1967, Papers of Lyndon Baines Johnson, President, 1963–1969, National Security File, Country File, China Vol. X, Box 241, Lyndon Baines Johnson Presidential Library, Austin, Texas, USA.

33 Intelligence Memorandum by Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Directorate of Intelligence, ‘The Outlook for Hong Kong’, 25 August 1967, CIA, Freedom of Information Act, Electronic Reading Room, http://www.foia.cia.gov.

34 Hong Kong to State Department, no. 1763, 20 September 1967, RG 59, Central Foreign Policy Files, 1967–1969, Political and Defense, Box 2176, USNA.

35 Mark, “Lack of Means or Loss of Will?”, pp. 67–68.

36 Memorandum by Thomson for DOPC, OPD (67)85, 4 Dec. 1967, FCO 40/92, TNA.

37 Memorandum, Moreton to Lawrence-Wilson, 29 November 1968, FCO 40/158, TNA.

38 See Memorandum by Stewart for MCHK, K(69)1, “Hong Kong: Long Term Study”, 28 March 1969, CAB 134/2945, TNA.

39 Godden to Moreton, 22 April 1969, FCO 40/160, TNA.

40 Memorandum, Moreton to Barrington, 7 May 1969, FCO 40/160; Memorandum, Carter to Wilford, 22 September 1969, ibid., TNA.

41 Memorandum, Wilford to Tomlinson, 18 November 1969, FCO 40/160; Memorandum, Wilford to Permanent Under-Secretary, 22 January 1970, FCO 40/265, TNA.

42 Memorandum by Stewart for MCHK, K(70)1, “Hong Kong: Long-term Study”, 9 February 1970, CAB 134/2945, TNA.

43 Memorandum, Wilford to Monson, with Annex: draft paper for ministers, 9 December 1970, FCO 40/265, TNA.

44 Memorandum, Cradock to Wilford, 15 December 1970, FCO 40/265, TNA.

45 Brief by Hong Kong Department for Secretary of State, 5 May 1970, FCO 40/265, TNA.

46 Mark, C-K., “The ‘Problem of People’: British Colonials, Cold War Powers, and the Chinese Refugees in Hong Kong, 1949–62”, Modern Asian Studies, 41: 6 (November 2007), pp. 1166–1170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Mills, Lawrence, Protecting Free Trade: The Hong Kong Paradox, 1947–97 (Hong Kong, 2012), p. 41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Mills, Protecting Free Trade, pp. 61–64; Lu, D. Q. and Lu, S. C., Xianggang jingji shi [A History of Hong Kong Economy] (Hong Kong, 2002), pp. 218–219 Google Scholar.

49 Welsh, F., History of Hong Kong (London, 1997), p. 460 Google Scholar; Goodstadt, L., Uneasy Partners: The Conflict between Public Interest and Private Profit in Hong Kong (Hong Kong, 2005), p. 55 Google Scholar; Faure, D., Colonialism and the Hong Kong Mentality (Hong Kong, 2003), p. 73 Google Scholar.

50 For an insightful analysis of Hong Kong's growing autonomy from London since 1945, see Goodstadt, Uneasy Partners, pp. 49–70.

51 See Tsang, S. Y-S., Democracy Shelved: Great Britain, China, and Attempts at Constitutional Reform in Hong Kong, 1945–52 (Hong Kong, 1988)Google Scholar; Faure, Colonialism and the Hong Kong Mentality; Clayton, D., “From ‘Free’ to ‘Fair’ Trade: The Evolution of Labour Laws in Colonial Hong Kong, 1958–62”, The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 35: 2 (June 2007), pp. 263–282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Welsh, History of Hong Kong, p. 463; Lu and Lu, Xianggang jingji shi, pp. 160–1. Also see Schenk, C., Hong Kong as an International Financial Centre: Emergence and Development, 1945–65 (London, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Schenk, “The Empire Strikes Back”, pp. 568–569.

54 Faure, D. and Lee, P-T. (eds.), A Documentary History of Hong Kong: Economy (Hong Kong, 2004), pp. 217–220 Google Scholar; Schenk, “The Empire Strikes Back”, pp. 570–577.

55 Schenk, C., The Decline of Sterling: Managing the Retreat of an International Currency, 1945–1992 (Cambridge, 2010), pp. 308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 349–351.

56 Note by Hong Kong Department, FCO, 10 July 1970, enclosed in Laird to Gildea, 10 July 1970, FCO 40/284, TNA.

57 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

58 Note by Board of Trade, August 1970, enclosed in Note by the Secretary, Working Group on Europe, WGE(70)37, 26 August 1970, FCO 40/285, TNA.

59 Record of meeting between Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary and members of the Executive and Legislative Councils, 19 April 1970, FCO 40/284, TNA.

60 Record of Consultations with Hong Kong officials, 2nd session, 23 November 1970, FCO 40/286, TNA.

61 Heath, E., The Course of My Life: My Autobiography (London, 1999), p. 468 Google Scholar.

62 When Britain eventually reached an agreement on entry into the Common market in 1973, “the EEC recognised Hong Kong's developing territory status, granted it [General Scheme of Preferences] on a number of products that were of no value, continued the exclusion of textiles, while France graciously withdrew two illegal restrictions on imports from Hong Kong . . . And that was the deal that the metropolitan power with international responsibility for its dependent territory did with the common market to settle ‘the question of Hong Kong'”. Fortunately, Hong Kong's resilient industry survived the loss of the Commonwealth Preference, for Hong Kong was becoming less dependent on the United Kingdom than on the United States and European and Asian countries; although Britain remained a significant market. Mills, Protecting Free Trade, pp. 149–150.

63 See Pepper, Keeping Democracy at Bay, pp. 128–137.

64 Miners, N., The Government and Politics of Hong Kong, 2nd edition (Hong Kong, 1977), pp. 192–193 Google Scholar.

65 Parliamentary Debates, House of Commons Debates, Hansard, 5th series, Session 1966–67, vol. 742: 27 February-10 March 1967, cols. 51–60 [quotation on col. 58].

66 See the contributions by the students of the Chinese University of Hong Kong and of the Hong Kong University to the official magazine of its Student Union, CU Student (Zhongda Xueshengbao) and Undergrad respectively. CU Student, 3: 9 (15 October 1971), pp. 8–9 and ibid., 4: 1 (15 January 1972), p. 2; Undergrad, 5 (16 October 1971), p. 2 and ibid., 12 (1 January 1972), p. 2.

67 See Lam, W-M., Understanding the Political Culture of Hong Kong: The Paradox of Activism and Depoliticization (Armonk, New York, 2004), pp. 125–156 Google Scholar; Hong Kong Federation of Students (ed.), Xianggang xuesheng yundong huigu [A Recollection of the Student Movement in Hong Kong] (Hong Kong, 1983), pp. 9–19 Google Scholar.

68 See Matthews, G., Ma, E. K-W., and Lui, T-L., Hong Kong, China: Learning to Belong to a Nation (London, 2008), pp. 27–35 Google Scholar.

69 See Lam, Understanding the Political Culture of Hong Kong; King, Ambrose Yeo-chi, “Administrative Absorption of Politics in Hong Kong: Emphasis on the Grass Roots Levels”, Asian Survey, 15: 5 (May 1975), pp. 422–439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Scott, I., Political Change and the Crisis of Legitimacy in Hong Kong (Hong Kong, 1999), pp. 106–126 Google Scholar.

70 Miners, The Government and Politics of Hong Kong, p. 193; Pepper, Keeping Democracy at Bay, p. 166.

71 The South China Morning Post, 3 September 1971.

72 Far Eastern Economic Review, 74: 44 (30 October 1971).

73 Sing Tao Wen Pao, 27 October 1971.

74 Hong Kong Times, 5 November 1971; Kung Sheung Yat Po, 30 October 1971.

75 It must be noted that Zhou made the comment on Hong Kong with reference to Taiwan. By that time, the Anglo-Chinese negotiation over the exchange of ambassadors was deadlocked over the British insistence on their legal view that Taiwan's status was “undetermined”. Zhou estimated that one of the reasons was that Britain “might fear that if we acknowledged China's sovereignty over Taiwan this would have an effect on the standing of Hong Kong”, a fear which MacDonald denied. Beijing to FCO, no. 1076, 19 October 1971, FCO 21/855, TNA.

76 Memorandum by Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary, DOP(71)83, 13 December 1971, CAB 148/117, TNA.

77 Roberts to Barrington, 3 January 1972, PREM 15/1626, TNA.

78 On 8 November, the UN General Assembly overwhelmingly adopted the Committee's resolution regarding Huang's request for excluding Hong Kong and Macao from the list of colonial territories. On 14 December, the British representative at the UN wrote to the General Secretary, stating that the approved resolution would not affect the legal status of Hong Kong. Beijing did not respond to the British letter. Huang, H., Qinli yu jianwen: Huang Hua huiyilu [Experience and Observation: Memoir of Huang Hua] (Beijing, 2007), pp. 193, 346Google Scholar.

79 See The South China Morning Post, 13 and 14 March 1972; Kung Sheung Yat Po, 12 March 1972; Sing Tao Jih Pao Daily, 12 March 1972; Ming Pao Daily News, 12 March 1972.

80 Joint Communique on Agreement between Britain and China on Exchange of Ambassadors, 13 March 1972, FCO 21/988, TNA.

81 Ming Pao Daily News, 14 March 1972 and 20 November 1972; Tin Tin Daily News, 16 March 1972.

82 Carroll, J., A Concise History of Hong Kong (Hong Kong, 2007), p. 176 Google Scholar.

83 MacLehose to Douglas-Home, 5 May 1972, FCO 21/1023, TNA.

84 The British Diplomatic Oral History Programme, No. 83, Interview with David Clive Wilson (Lord Wilson of Tillyorn) 2003, p. 34. http://www.chu.cam.ac.uk/archives/collections/BDOHP/Wilson.pdf.