^{page 1079 note 1} Cf. Vedic Index, i, 479Google Scholar; below, p. 1087.

^{page 1079 note 2} The critical note (p. 16, n. 4) does not mention G. expressly, doubtless by a misprint or oversight. On the other hand, on p. 73, n. 5, the mention of N. is inconsistent with the fact (n. 3) that N. omits the Kaṇḍikā.

^{page 1080 note 1} Cf. ĀpŚS. vi, 25. 6; xv, 20. 2, etc.Google Scholar

^{page 1080 note 2} Bühler, , SBE. xiv, p. xxxviii, n. 3.Google Scholar

^{page 1080 note 3} The ed. omits sūtrakārāya, but N. has it, and it is clearly needed. G. has omitted it by an obvious accident.

^{page 1080 note 4} Bühler, , op. cit. p. xxxvi, n. 1Google Scholar; see also HGS. ii, 20. 1Google Scholar. This has Palingu, but the evidence of all these texts shows that Oldenberg (SBE. xxx, p. 295, n.)Google Scholar is wrong in suggesting the replacement of Paiṅgi from the Kāṇḍānukrama.

^{page 1081 note 1} Bühler, , SBE. xiv, p. xl, n. 1.Google Scholar

^{page 1082 note 1} For Āpastamba and the Arthaśāstra, see Bühler, , SBE. ii, p. xxxii.Google Scholar

^{page 1082 note 2} The corresponding passage in HGS. i, 7. 26Google Scholar is not commented on and is, no doubt, late.

^{page 1083 note 1} bhavet is suggested by Dr. Salomons.

^{page 1083 note 2} See Oldenberg, SBE. xxx, pp. xxxvi, xxxvii.Google Scholar

^{page 1083 note 3} Introd. pp. xxiv, xxv.

^{page 1083 note 4} Āp. has pratinanditāḥ, which must be right. Pratininditāḥ may be an oversight of the ed.

^{page 1083 note 5} N, has uhyate.

^{page 1084 note 1} Whitney, , Sanskrit Grammar, § 990a.Google Scholar

^{page 1084 note 2} SBE. xxx, 184.Google Scholar

^{page 1085 note 1} See Vedic Index, ii, 42, 202, 515.Google Scholar

^{page 1085 note 2} Karmānta Sūtra, i, 2Google Scholar: yajña iti kimupajñaḥ.

^{page 1085 note 3} See Thomas, , JRAS. 1914, pp. 392–4, 752.Google Scholar

^{page 1085 note 4} Introd. p. xiv.

^{page 1086 note 1} So Professor Caland in a note to me dated July 30, 1912, citing Speijer, , Sanskrit SyntaxGoogle Scholar, § 78, Rem. 2.

^{page 1087 note 1} Whitney, l.c.

^{page 1087 note 2} Whitney, §§ 1043c, 738.

^{page 1087 note 3} Introd. pp. xiii–xxiii.

^{page 1087 note 4} See Vedic Index, i, 394 seqq.Google Scholar

^{page 1088 note 1} e.g. Crawley, , The Mystic RoseGoogle Scholar. For the idea of danger see Hiraṇyakeśin, , i, 24. 1 seqq.Google Scholar

^{page 1089 note 1} p. 117, n. 1.

^{page 1089 note 2} SBE. xxx, 291.Google Scholar