Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T21:29:22.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1.South Indian Bronzes: a historical survey of South Indian sculpture, with iconographical notes based on original sources, by O. C. Gangoly. With an introductory note by J. G. Woodroffe. 4to; pp. xiii, 80, with 26 + 95 plates. Published by the Indian Society of Oriental Art, Calcutta, 1915. - 2.Memoirs of the Colombo Museum. Series A, No. 1: Bronzes From Ceylon, chiefly in the Colombo Museum, by Ananda K. Coomaraswamy, D.Sc. 4to; pp. 31, with 28 plates. Printed for the Colombo Museum, University Press, Oxford, 1914.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notices of Books
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1916

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 175 note 1 We may mention as examples the following monstrosities of transliteration: Deb jāni and Balliramayee (p. 10)Google Scholar, Raj Raj (p. 12)Google Scholar, Narshinha Varmana (p. 13)Google Scholar, Vabishyottara purāna (p. 26)Google Scholar, Chillapp-āti-Kāram (p. 56)Google Scholar. So reckless is Mr. Gangoly in his passion for the vernacular Bengali pronunciation that he even ascribes it to other writers innocent of it: thus he quotes the paper “Artha-pañcaka” in this Journal (1910, p. 576) as “Aratha Pancak”.

page 176 note 1 For example, the date ascribed by him to Māṇikkavāchakar is quite wrong: it is now demonstrable that he flourished between 800 and 1000 a.d.

page 176 note 2 The Vaishṇava schools are scarcely mentioned, and there is not a word said about such typical developments as e.g. the sculpture of the Hoysaḷa artists.