Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T15:42:52.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Interorder Price Alignment Model for the Northeast Federal Milk Marketing Orders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Ian W. Hardie*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics University of Maryland
Get access

Extract

Advances in storage, transportation, packaging and management have removed many of the old barriers between the Northeast's fluid milk markets. As the barriers disappear, the resulting market interdependence increases the importance of carefully aligning the minimum base prices set for unprocessed milk in the Northeastern federal milk marketing orders. For if these prices should get out of line, the lack of spatial barriers can encourage intermarket transfers which run counter to the orders’ objectives.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected References

1. Babb, Emerson M.Changing Marketing Patterns and Competition of Fluid Milk”. Journal of Farm Economics, Volume 48, No. 3, Part II (August 1966), 5368.Google Scholar
2. Northeastern Dairy Adjustments Committee. Dairy Adjustments in the Northeast, An Analysis of Potential Production and Market Equilibrium. Bulletin 498. New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station, June 1968.Google Scholar
3. Devino, Gary; Bradfield, Alec; Mengel, John and Webster, Fred. Economies of Size in Large Fluid Milk Processing Plants, Research Report MP62, Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station, May 1970.Google Scholar
4. Dobson, W. D. and Babb, E. M. An Analysis of Alternative Price Structures and Intermarket Competition in Federal Order Milk Markets. Research Bulletin 870. Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station, December, 1970.Google Scholar
5. Hsiao, James C. and Kottke, Marvin W. Spatial Equilibrium Analysis of the Dairy Industry in the Northeast Region – An Application of Quadratic Programming. Bulletin 405. Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station, July 1968.Google Scholar
6. Johnson, Stewart, Professor of Agricultural Economics. Statement for presentation at public hearing beginning December 5, 1967 to consider proposed admendments to federal milk orders 2, 1 and 15. University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.Google Scholar
7. Kerchner, Orval. Cost of Transporting Bulk and Packaged Milk by Truck. Marketing Research Report No. 791. U.S. Department of Agriculture, May 1967Google Scholar
8. Kloth, Donald W. and Blakley, Leo V. Optimum Market Organizations of the Fluid Milk Industry in the United States Under Alternative Marketing Strategies. Technical Bulletin T-133. Oklahoma State Agricultural Experiment Station, October, 1971.Google Scholar
9. Kottke, Marvin W.Spatial, Temporal and Product-Use Allocation of Milk in an Imperfectly Competitive Dairy IndustryAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 52, No. 1 (February, 1970), 3340.Google Scholar
10. Stitts, D.G. and Hammond, J.W. A Method of Estimating Normative Prices and Supplies in Federal Order Milk Markets. Technical Bulletin 278, University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, 1970.Google Scholar
11. Tidhar, Yehoshua. “Class 1 Price Differentials Among the Northeastern Federal Milk Marketing Order: A Linear Programming Application.” Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, University of Connecticut, 1969.Google Scholar
12. Tidhar, Yehoshua and Hardie, Ian W. Interorder Relationships Among the Northeastern Federal Milk Marketing Orders. Bulletin 418. Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station, December, 1971.Google Scholar