Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T13:31:01.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Evaluation System for the Natural Resource Sectors of the Prince Edward Island Development Plan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Frank W. Millerd*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Waterloo Lutheran University
Get access

Extract

Prince Edward Island, one of the four Atlantic Provinces of Canada, has recently, in conjunction with the Federal government, undertaken a comprehensive development plan in an effort to break the “vicious circle” of poverty, low income and low productivity characteristic of a depressed region. Before the development plan was instituted, levels of unemployment on the island were consistently three to seven percent above the national average. The economy is characterized by a heavy dependence upon land based resource industry, particularly agriculture, and the resources of the sea. The small amount of manufacturing is related almost entirely to these resources and is organized in small production units. Accordingly, per capita income ranges between 60% and 70% of the national average. The P.E.I. development plan is broad-based, massive in relation to the economy of the island, and contained in a single geographical and political unit. Development projects are planned, not just for a few sectors of the economy, but for practically all sectors and at a scale of investment where significant changes should occur.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Canada. Department of Regional Economic Expansion. Development Plan for Prince Edward Island. Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1969.Google Scholar
Churchman, C.W., and Schaipblatt, A.H.PPB: How Can it be Implemented?Public Administration Review, XXIX, No. 2 (March-April, 1969), 178–88.Google Scholar
Lovering, James et al. “A Macro Land Use Plan for P.E.I.Ottawa: Canada Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, 1969. (Mimeographed).Google Scholar
McGuire, Martin C.Program Analysis and Regional Economic Objectives,” in U.S. Congress, Joint Economic Committee. The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The PPB System. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969, pp. 592603.Google Scholar
Meyer, John R.Regional Economics: A Survey”. American Economic Review, LIII, No. 1 (March, 1963), 1954.Google Scholar
Prince Edward Island. Office of the Premier. Policy Statement on Government Reorganization. Presented to the Legislative Assembly, June 24, 1970. Charlottetown: Queen's Printer, 1970.Google Scholar
Schick, Allen. “Systems Politics and Systems Budgeting.” Public Administration Review, XXIX, No. 2 (March-April, 1969), 137151.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. “Rescuing Policy Analysis from P.P.B.S.” Public Administration Review, XXIX, No. 2 (March-April 1969), 189202.Google Scholar