Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T21:48:34.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ultrastructure of the skeleton and skeletogenic tissues of the temperate coral Caryophyllia smithii

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Martin D'A.A. Le Tissier
Martin D'A.A. Le Tissier
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Zoology, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 228, Reading, RG6 2AJ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The skeleton and calicoblastic ectoderm of the scleractinian non-zooxanthellate coral Caryophyllia smithii were investigated by light microscopy, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Except for some costal spines, the skeleton was fasciculate. Fasciculi were made up of bundles of crystalline needles, each crystalline needle consisting of a number of linear series of small (<1 μm) rounded crystals. Fractured skeletons showed the fasciculi to be arranged into layers and that within some septa, theca and costal spines there were spaces that contained neither mineral nor organic matter. These spaces could also be found at the growing edges of septa and theca. Demineralization of the skeleton revealed an organic matrix whose configuration mirrored the architecture of the skeleton. In areas of the skeleton where deposition was occurring the overlying calicoblastic ectoderm was relatively thin with prominent intercellular spaces and secretory vesicles. In contrast, over non-depositing areas the calicoblastic ectoderm was thick and contained residual bodies, nematocysts and membrane-bound granules. The results are compared and contrasted with those from scleractinian corals that have endosymbiotic zooxanthellae.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , May 1990 , pp. 295 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, D.J., 1970. Coral skeletons: an explanation of their growth and structure. Science, New York, 170, 1305–1308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, D.J., 1972. The structure and function of growth ridges in scleractinian coral skeletons. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B), 182, 331–350.Google Scholar
Bevelander, G. & Nakahara, M., 1969. An electron microscope study of the formation of the nacreous layer in the shell of certain bivalve molluscs. Calcified Tissue Research, 3, 84–92.Google Scholar
Gladfelter, E.H., 1982. Skeletal development in Acropora cervicornis. I. Patterns of CaCO3 accretion in the axial corallite. Coral Reefs, 1, 45–51.Google Scholar
Gladfelter, E.H., 1983. Skeletal development in Acropora cervicornis. II. Diel patterns of CaCO 3accretion. Coral Reefs, 2, 91–100.Google Scholar
Gladfelter, E.H., 1985. Metabolism, calcification and carbon production. II. Organism-level studies. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Coral Reef Congress, Tahiti, 1985, vol. 4 (ed. C., Gabieet al), pp. 527–539. Moorea, French Polynesia: Antenne Museum-Ephe.Google Scholar
Goreau, T.J., 1959. The physiology of skeleton formation in corals. I. A method for measuring the rate of calcium deposition by corals under different conditions. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 116, 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goreau, T.F., 1961. Problems of growth and calcium deposition in reef corals. Endeavour, 20, 32–39.Google Scholar
Isa, Y., 1986. An electron microscope study on the mineralization of the skeleton of the staghorn coral Acropora hebes. Marine Biology, 93, 91–101.Google Scholar
Jell, J.S., 1974. The microstructure of some scleractinan corals. In Proceedings of the Second International Coral Reef Symposium, Brisbane, vol. 2 (ed. A.M., Cameronet ah), pp. 301–320. Brisbane: The Great Barrier Reef Committee.Google Scholar
Johnston, I.S., 1978. Functional Ultrastructure of the Skeleton and Skeletogenic Tissues of the Reef Coral Pocillopora damicornis. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Johnston, I.S., 1980. The ultrastructure of skeletogenesis in zooxanthellate corals. International Review of Cytology, 67, 171–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinchington, D., 1981. Calcification Processes of Cool Temperate Corals. PhD Dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
Le Tissier, M.D' A.A., 1987. The Nature and Construction of Skeletal Spines in Pocillopora damicornis (Linnaeus). PhD dissertation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Le Tissier, M.D'A.A., 1988a. Diurnal patterns of skeleton formation in Pocillopora damicornis (L.). Coral Reefs, 7, 81–88.Google Scholar
Le Tissier, M.D'A.A., 1988b. Patterns of formation and the ultrastructure of the larval skeleton of Pocillopora damicornis. Marine Biology, 98, 493–501.Google Scholar
Pearse, V.B. & Muscatine, L., 1971. Role of zooxanthellate algae (zooxanthellae) in coral calcification. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 141, 350–363.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, H., 1970. Cell communication, calcium ion and cyclic adenosine monophosphate. Science, New York, 170, 404–412.Google Scholar
Schuhmacher, H. & Zibrowius, H., 1985. What is hermatypic? A redefinition of ecological groups in corals and other organisms. Coral Reefs, 4, 1–10.Google Scholar
Simkiss, K., 1976. Cellular aspects of calcification. In The Mechanisms of Mineralization in the Invertebrates and Plants (ed. N., Watabe and K.M., Wilbur), pp. 1–31. Columbia: South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Simkiss, K., 1983. Trace elements as probes of bibmineralization. In Biominemlization and Biological Metal Accumulation (ed. P., Westbroek and E.W., De Jong), pp. 363–371. Amsterdam: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Simkiss, K., 1984. The karyotic mineralization window (KMW). American Zoologist, 24, 847–856.Google Scholar
Simkiss, K., 1986. The process of biomineralization in lower plants and animals - an overview. In Biomineralizaton in Lower Plants and Animals (ed. B.S.C., Leadbeater and R., Riding), pp. 19–38. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Systematics Association Special Volume 30.]Google Scholar
Sorauf, J.E., 1970. Microstructure and formation of dissepiments in the skeleton of the recent scleractinia (hexacorals). Biomineralization, 2, 1–22.Google Scholar
Vandermeulen, J.H., 1975. Studies on reef corals. III. Fine structural changes of calicoblast cells in Pocillopora damicornis during settling and calcification. Marine Biology, 31, 69–77.Google Scholar
Wainwright, S.A., 1964. Studies of the mineral phase of coral skeleton. Experimental Cell Research, 34, 213–230.Google Scholar
Wainwright, S.A., Biggs, W.D., Currey, J.D. & Gosline, J.M., 1976. Mechanical Design in Organisms. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Wells, J.W., 1956. Scleractinia. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology (ed. R.C., Moore), pp. 328–477. Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Wise, S.W., 1972. Observations on fasciculi on developmental surfaces of scleractinian coral exoskeletons. Biomineralization, 6, 160–175.Google Scholar
Young, S.D., O'connor, J.D. & Muscadine, L., 1971. Organic material from scleractinian coral skeletons. 2. Incorporation of 14C into protein, chitin and lipid. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 40 B, 945–958.Google Scholar