Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T04:04:27.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of the seasonal changes of the water mass of Christchurch Harbour, England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. W. Murray
J. W. Murray
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Bristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Detailed sampling of the bottom water of Christchurch Harbour, England, was undertaken in conjunction with a study of the living and dead foraminiferids (to be described later). The Harbour is a shallow estuary with an unusual tidal regime of four high tides daily. During the winter the flow of fresh water from the rivers prevents sea water from entering much of the estuary. During the spring, summer and autumn, when drier conditions prevail on land, the sea enters the estuary as a salt wedge and there is pronounced salinity stratification. In addition to determinations of chlorinity, pH, dissolved oxygen and temperature, analyses of calcium were made during the spring, and of calcium and magnesium in the summer. It was found that calcium was preferentially removed from the bottom water, thus upsetting the calcium-chlorinity ratio. The cause of the calcium removal is thought to be biological activity. Magnesium was not affected by this process. A discussion of the results is presented and it is suggested that biological removal of calcium from the bottom water is particularly well developed in Christchurch Harbour owing to the extensive areas of shoal water favouring biological activity. Estuaries of this type may not be very common.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , October 1966 , pp. 561 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, W. B.Southgate, B. A. & Bassindale, R. 1935. Survey of the River Tees. Part II. The estuary—chemical and biological. Tech. Pap. Wat. Pollut. Res. D.S.I.R., No. 53 171 PP.Google Scholar
Andel, T. Van & Postma, H. 1954. Recent sediments of the Gulf of Paria. Reports of the Orinoco Shelf Expedition, Vol. 1. Verh. K. ned. Akad. Wett., Afd. Natuurkunde, Reeke I, Deel 20, No. 5.Google Scholar
Carpenter, J. H. 1957. A study of some major cations in natural water. Tech. Rep. Chesapeake Bay Inst., Vol. 15, ref. 57–7.Google Scholar
Goedecke, E. 1936. Der Kalkgehalt im Oberfläschenwasser der Unterelbe und Deutschen Bucht. Aus Arch. dt. Seew., Bd. 55, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Gripenberg, S. 1937. The calcium content of Baltic water. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 12, pp. 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, M. 1956. Ionic ratios of some of the major components in river-diluted sea water in Bute and Knight inlets, British Columbia. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., Vol. 13, pp. 273–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, A. 1938. The ecology of the Tamar estuary. III. Salinity and temperature conditions in the lower estuary. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 22, pp. 529–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. W. 1962. A new bottom-water sampler for ecologists. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 42, pp. 499–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. W. 1965. On the Foraminiferida of the Plymouth region. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 45, pp. 481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sverdrup, H. U.Johnson, M. W. & Fleming, R. H. 1946. The Oceans, their Physics, Chemistry and General Biology, 1087 pp. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Smith, C. L. 1940. The Great Bahama Bank. II. Calcium carbonate precipitation. J. mar. Res., Vol. 3, pp. 171–89.Google Scholar
Swain, A. & Newman, O. F. 1962. Hydrographical survey of the River Tyne. Fishery Invest., Lond., Ser. 1, Vol. 6, No. 3.Google Scholar