Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:09:48.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stomatogenesis and morphological re-description of the marine ciliate, Philasterides armatalis (Protozoa: Ciliophora: Scuticociliatida)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2008

Xiaozhong Hu*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Protozoology, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, People's Republic of China Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK
Alan Warren
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK
Weibo Song
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Protozoology, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, People's Republic of China
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Xiaozhang Hu Laboratory of Protozoology OceanUniversity of ChinaQingdao 266003People's Republic of China email: xiaozhonghu@ouc.edu.cn

Abstract

The stomatogenesis and morphology of the marine planktonic ciliate Philasterides armatalis collected from mollusc-culturing waters off the coast of Qingdao, China, were studied using a differential interference contrast microscope for observations in vivo and protargol impregnation. In terms of its infraciliature, this species possesses typical characteristics of the genus Philasterides: bipartite paroral membrane, the anterior part double-rowed and the posterior part in a zig-zag-formation, and three well-defined membranelles arranged in Paranophrys-pattern. This investigation confirms the dual origin of the buccal apparatus in the opisthe, one derived from the scutica and the other from the paroral membrane. Its stomatogenesis belongs to the ‘Philasterides’ sub-type, although it differs from its only congener P. armata, in that paroral membrane 1 gives rise to the paroral membrane and the scutica in the proter, and paroral membrane 2 forms the paroral membrane, membranelles 1 and 2 and the scutica in the opisthe. Based on stomatogenetic data, the phylogenetic positions of several genera in the suborder Philasterina are reconsidered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Corliss, J.O. (1968) The value of ontogenetic data in reconstructing protozoan phylogenies. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 87, 120.Google Scholar
Corliss, J.O. (1979) The ciliated Protozoa: characterization, classification and guide to the literature 2nd edn. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Evans, F.R. and Corliss, J.O. (1964) Morphogenesis in the hymenostome ciliate Pseudocohnilembus persalinus and its taxonomic and phylogenetic implications. Journal of Protozoology 11, 353370.Google Scholar
Grolière, C. (1974) Étude comparée de la stomatogenèse chez quelques ciliés Hymenostomes des genres Paralembus Kahl, 1933, Philaster Fabre-Domergue, 1885, Parauronema Thompson, 1967, Tetrahymena Furgasson, 1940. Protistologica 10, 319331.Google Scholar
Grolière, C.A. (1980) Morphologie et stomatogenèse chez deux ciliés Scuticociliatida des genres Philasterides Kahl, 1926 et Cyclidium O.F. Müller, 1786. Acta Protozoologica 19, 195206.Google Scholar
Lynn, D.H. and Small, E.B. (2002) Phylum Ciliophora. In Lee, J.J. et al. (eds) The illustrated guide to the protozoa. Lawrence, KS, USA: Allen Press Inc, pp. 371656.Google Scholar
Ma, H.W. and Song, W.B. (2003) Stomatogenesis of the marine ciliate Metanophrys sinensis (Protozoa: Ciliophora: Scuticociliatida). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83, 407410.Google Scholar
Ma, H.W., Song, W.B. and Hu, X.Z. (2001) Stomatogenesis of the marine ciliate Paranophrys magna (Protozoa: Ciliophora: Scuticociliatida) from Qingdao, China. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 81, 377382.Google Scholar
Ma, H.W., Song, W.B. and Ma, H.G. (2002) Morphogenetic processes in division of Uronemella filificum (Ciliophora, Scuticociliatida). Journal of the Ocean University of Qingdao 1, 140144.Google Scholar
Morado, J.F. and Small, E.B. (1994) Morphology and stomatogenesis of Mesanophrys pugettensis n. sp. (Scuticociliatida: Orchitophryidae), a facultative parasitic ciliate of the Dungeness crab, Cancer magister (Crustacea: Decapoda). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 113, 343364.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J.M., Brownlee, D.C. and Small, E.B. (1980) Potomacus pottsi Thompson, 1967 (Scuticociliatida, Ciliophora): stomatogenesis with redescription of the microstome trophont. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 99, 4351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, E.B. (1967) The Scuticociliatida, a new order of the class Ciliatea (phylum Protozoa, subphylum Ciliophora). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 84, 345370.Google Scholar
Small, E.B. and Lynn, D.H. (1985) Phylum Ciliophora Doflein, 1901. In Lee, J.J. et al. (eds) An illustrated guide to the protozoa. Lawrence, Kansas: Society of Protozoologists, pp. 393575.Google Scholar
Song, W. (2000) Morphological and taxonomical studies on some marine scuticociliates from China Sea, with description of two new species, Philasterides armatalis sp. n. and Cyclidium varibonneti sp. n. (Protozoa: Ciliophora: Scuticociliatida). Acta Protozoologica 39, 295322.Google Scholar
Song, W. and Wilbert, N. (1989) Taxonomische Untersuchungen an Aufwuchsciliaten (Protozoa, Ciliophora) im Poppelsdorfer Weiher, Bonn. Lauterbornia 3, 2221.Google Scholar