Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T09:42:04.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The sexuality and spawning of Manx Pectinids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Kosaraju Reddiah
Kosaraju Reddiah
Affiliation:
Eastern Regional Station, Zoological Survey of India, Shillong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The results of a comparative study of the breeding biology of the Manx pectinids with special reference to Chlamys varia, C. distorta, C. tigerina, C. striata and C. furtiva are presented.

It is shown that C. varia and C. distorta are protandric hermaphrodites with separate sexual phases similar to those of oysters, and evidence is presented on the possibility of sex reversal. The other species, C. tigerina, C. striata and C. furtiva, are truly dioecious, possessing at no stage germ cells of both sexes in the same gonad and as most individuals produce only one brood, the possibility of sex reversal is excluded.

C. distorta has two large-scale or peak spawning periods, once in summer and for the second time in autumn, although some spawning occurs as a rule in most months of the year. The breeding behaviour of this species is intermittent and therefore the breeding period is prolonged.

C. varia has two mass spawnings in a year, once in June and for the second time during September and October and the breeding period is not markedly different from that observed in French waters. Spawning is usually completed within a short period. C. tigerina and C. striata spawn only once annually in June and August respectively and most individuals have only one breeding cycle during their life time. C. furtiva however, may have two spawnings in a year, but the material available was inadequate to confirm this.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , October 1962 , pp. 683 - 703
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Coe, W. R., 1943. Development of the primary gonad and differentiation of sexuality in Teredo navalis and other pelecypod mollusks. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole, Vol. 84 pp. 178–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coe, W. R., 1945. Development of reproductive system and variations in sexuality in Pecten and other pelecypod mollusks. Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci., Vol. 36, pp. 673–700.Google Scholar
Darin, W. J., 1909. Pecten. Mem. Lpool mar. Biol. Comm., No. 17.Google Scholar
Dalmon, J., 1935. Note sur la biologie du pétoncle (Chlamys varia L.). Rev. Trav. Off. Pêches mark., T. 8, pp. 268–81.Google Scholar
Dalmon, J., 1938. Divers modes de sexualité chez les mollusques lamellibranches de la famille Pectinidae; changement de sexe et hermaphroditisme transitoire chez Chlamys varia L. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 207, pp. 181–3.Google Scholar
Drew, G. A., 1906. The habits, anatomy and embryology of the giant scallop (Pecten tenuicostatus, Mighels). Univ. Maine Studies, No. 6, 71 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fullarton, J. H., 1890. On the development of the common scallop (Pecten opercularis L.). Rep. Fish. Bd Scot., No. 8, 6, pp. 290–9.Google Scholar
Jørgenson, B., 1946. Lamellibranch veligers from Danish waters. Medd. Komm. Havundersøg., Kbh., Ser. Plankt., Bd. 4, pp. 277–344.Google Scholar
Jones, N. S., 1951. The bottom fauna off the south of the Isle of Man. J. Anim. Ecol. Vol. 20, pp. 132–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M., 1938. Notes on the breeding of some lamellibranchs from Plymouth, and their larvae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 23, pp. 119–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubet, P., 1951. Sur l'emission des gametes chez Chlamys varia L. (Moll. Lamellibr.) C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 233, pp. 1680–1.Google Scholar
Lubet, P., 1953 a. Quelques remarques sur le sexe des pectinacés (Moll. Lamellibr.). C.R. Acad. Set., Paris, T. 236, pp. 129–30.Google Scholar
Lubet, P., 1953 b. Sur les modalités de l'éjaculation et de la ponte chez Chlamys varia L. (Moll, lamellibr.). C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris., T. 236, pp. 235–6.Google Scholar
Mason, J., 1957. The age and growth of the scallop, Pecten maximus (L.) in Manx waters. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 36, pp. 473–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J., 1958. The breeding of the scallop, Pecten maximus (L.) in Manx waters. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 37, pp. 653–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, J. H., 1927. Observations and experiments on sex change in the European oyster, O. edulis. Pt. I. The change from female to male. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 14, pp. 967–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1895. Hermaphroditism in Mollusca. Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 37, pp. 19–46.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1935. Essai d'éthologie zoologique d'après I'etude des mollusques. 662 pp. Bruxelles. [not seen.]Google Scholar
Posgay, J. A., 1950. Investigations of the scallop, Pectengrandis: in Turner, H. J., Third report on investigations of methods of improving the shellfish resources of Massachusetts, pp. 29–30. (Wood's Hole Oceanographic Institution, Contr. No. 564, 1951).Google Scholar
Rees, C. B., 1954. Continuous plankton records; the distribution of thelamellibranch larvae in the North Sea. Bull. mar. Ecol., Vol. 4, pp. 21–46.Google Scholar
Tang, S. F., 1941. The breeding of the scallop (Pecten maximus L.) with a note on the growth rate. Proc. Lpool biol. Soc., Vol. 54, pp. 9–28.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, G., 1953. Ecology of the Scallop, Pecten yessoensis Jay. Sci. Rep. Tdhoku Univ., Ser. 4, Vol. 20, pp. 11–32.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1951. Studies on the pacific coast Mollusks. III. Observations on Hinnites multirugosus (Gale). Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool., Vol. 55, pp. 409–20.Google Scholar