Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T21:46:36.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The response mechanism in ascidians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Graham Hoyle
Graham Hoyle
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A method is described for investigating the reactions and spontaneous activity of two species of ascidian, Phallusia mammillata and Ascidiella aspersa, which does not disturb the animals unduly. The method can be used for obtaining graphic records of the so-called ‘reflexes’ of ascidians.

If due attention is paid to certain factors which affect the state ofthe animals, they can be made to respond to electrical stimuli applied to the outside of the test in a way which can be observed repeatedly in the same animal, in other animals of the same species and in at least two genera of ascidian.

Electrical stimuli applied to the test affect the excitable system of the whole animal in an all-or-nothing manner.

Response to graded electrical stimulation reveals a facilitation mechanism which gives enormous enhancement to the size and speed of response to the second of a close pair of effective stimuli. It is suggested that this mechanism is responsible for the production of the rapid squirt of the large sedentary ascidians.

A possible cause of the very rapid fatigue of ascidians to all kinds of stimulation is fatigue of the facilitation mechanism following a period of stimulation.

A parallel is drawn between the responses of Metridium and the responses of Phallusia and Ascidiella. The responses have some common features and the response mechanism appears to serve a similar purpose in the life of the animals.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , October 1952 , pp. 287 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bacq, Z. M., 1935. Observations physiologiques sur le cœur, les muscles et le systeme nerveux d'une Ascidie Ciona intestinalis. Arch. Int. Physiol. T. 40, pp. 357–73.Google Scholar
Batham, E. J. & Pantin, C. F. A., 1950. Phases of activity in the sea anemone Metridium senile, and their relation to external stimuli. Journ. Exp. Biol., Vol. 27, pp. 377–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berrill, N. J., 1950. The Tunicata. Ray Society, London. 354 pp.Google Scholar
Von Buddenbrock, W., 1928. Grundriss der Vergleichenden Physiologie, Berlin. 830 pp.Google Scholar
Bullock, T. H., 1943. Neuromuscular facilitation in Scyphomedusae. Journ. Cell. Comp. Physiol., Vol. 22, pp. 251–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, S. M., 1936. On the structure and function of the ascidian test. Journ. Morph., Vol. 59, pp. 539–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, E. C., 1919. The physiology of the nervous system of the tunicate. I. The relation of the nerve ganglion to sensory responses. Journ. Exp. Zool., Vol. 28, pp. 307–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedele, M., 1937 a. Ancora sulla inesistenza di una rete nervosa perifica nei Tunicata. Rend. Acc. Lincei., Vol. 25, pp. 656–61.Google Scholar
Fedele, M., 1937 b. Contrattilità ed eccitazione neurogena e miogena negli ‘Ascidiacea’. Rend. Acc. Lincei., Vol. 26, pp. 31–7.Google Scholar
Hecht, S., 1918. The physiology of Ascidia atra. Journ. Exp. Zool., Vol. 25, pp. 229–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, H., 1908. Uber reflexarme Tiere. Ein Beitrag zur Vergleichende Physiologie des Zentralen Nervensystems, vornehmlich auf grund von versuche an Ciona intestinalis und Oktopoden. Zeitschr. fur Allg. Physiol., Bd. 7, pp. 86–135.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, T., 1910. Uber den Einfluss mehrer aufeinander folgender wirksamer Reize auf den Ablauf der Reaktionsbewegungen bei Wirbellosen. I. Mitteilung. Versuche an Tunicaten. Pftüg. Arch. ges. Physiol., Bd. 134, pp. 501–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinoshita, T., 1911. Uber den Einfluss mehrer aufeinander folgender wirksamer Reize auf den Ablauf der Reaktionsbewegungen bei Wirbellosen. II. Mitteilung. Versuche an Coelenteraten. Pflüg. Arch. ges. Physiol., Bd. 140, pp. 167–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, J., 1901. Comparative Physiology of the Brain and Psychology. New York. 309 pp.Google Scholar
Pantin, C. F. A., 1935 a. The nerve-net of the Actinozoa. I. Facilitation. Journ. Exp. Biol., Vol. 12, pp. 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantin, C. F. A., 1935 b. The nerve-net of the Actinozoa. II. Plan of the nerve-net. Journ. Exp. Biol., Vol. 12, pp. 139–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantin, C. F. A., 1935 c. The nerve-net of the Actinozoa. III. Polarity and after-discharge. Journ. Exp. Biol., Vol. 12, pp. 156–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polimanti, O., 1911. Beiträge zur Physiologie des Nervensystems und der Bewegung bei den niederen Thieren. II. Ciona intestinalis L. Arch. Anat. Physiol., Phys Abth. Suppl. 1911, pp. 39–152.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, Z., 1931. Some notes on the physiology of Styela clava. Sci. Rep. Tohoko Imp. Univ., Vol. 6, pp. 597–607.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1949. The Sea Shore. London. 311 pp.Google Scholar