Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T06:13:25.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rays and Skates of Devon and Cornwall. III. The Proportions of the Sexes in Nature and in Commercial Landings, and their Significance to the Fishery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

G. A. Steven
Affiliation:
Assistant Naturalist at the Plymouth Laboratory.

Extract

The belief for long was held by early investigators that among most if not among all Elasmobranch fishes the number of females in the stocks exceeded that of the males. As long ago as 1884 Day (4, p. 345) remarked concerning the Thornback Ray, Raia clavata, “It has been said that the number of females is in excess of that of the males.” Haacke (9, p. 246), writing in 1885, says of the Sharks and Rays which he had observed in South Australian waters, “Bei den südaustralischen Haien und Rochen, auf deren Fang ich zu wiederholten Malen ausgezogen bin und von denen mir auch nicht selten Exemplare für das Adelaider Museum zugeschickt wurden, habe ich die Wahrnehmung gemacht, dass Männchen verhältnismässig sehr selten gefangen werden. Ob diese Wahrnehmung auch anderswo gemacht worden ist, weiss ich nicht, jedoch ist es nicht unwahrscheinlich; in der mir zu Gebote stehenden Litteratur finde ich nichts darüber. Die seltenheit der geschlechtsreifen Männchen, soweit sie sich wenigstens durch die Fangresultate dokumentiert, gilt für sämtliche Species der ziemlich artenreichen südaustralischen Selachierfauna.”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CONSULTED

1. Clakk, Robert S.Rays and Skates (Raiæ). No. 1. Egg-Capsules and Young. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XII, p. 577. 1922.Google Scholar
2. Clakk, Robert S.Rays and Skates; a Revision of the European Species. Fisheries, Scotland, Sci. Invest. 1926, I. (1926.)Google Scholar
3.Craigie, E. Horne. Sex-Ratio in Canadian Marine Fishes. Contrib. Canad. Biol., N.S., Vol. III, p. 489. 1927.Google Scholar
4. Day, Francis. British Fishes. Vol. II, London. 18801884.Google Scholar
5. Ford, E.A Contribution to Our Knowledge of the Life-Histories of the Dogfishes landed at Plymouth. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XII, p. 468. 1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Ford, E. The Economic Value of the Dogfish. Fish Trades Gazette. March 20th, 1920.Google Scholar
7. Fulton, T. Wemyss. The proportional Numbers and Sizes of the Sexes among Sea Fishes. 8th Ann. Rept. Fishery Board for Scotland, Pt. III, p. 348. (1889), 1890.Google Scholar
8. Fulton, T. Wemyss. Ichthyological Notes. 21st Ann. Rept. Fishery Board for Scotland, Pt. III, p. 228. (1902), 1903.Google Scholar
9. Haacke, Wilhelm. Über das Zahlen-Verhältnis der Geschlechter bei Haien und Rochen. Der Zoologische Garten, XXVI Jahrgang, p. 246, Frankfurt a. M. 1885.Google Scholar
10. Hickling, C. F.A Contribution towards the Life-History of the Spur Dog. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XVI, p. 529. 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Lamont, Augusta. Relative Frequency of Species and Sex-Ratios in the Skates and Rays (Genus Raia). Proc. Royal Physical Soc., Edinb., Vol. XXI, p. 73. 1925.Google Scholar
12. Steven, G. A.Rays and Skates of Devon and Cornwall. II. A Study of the Fishery; with Notes on the Occurrence, Migrations, and Habits of the Species. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XVIII, p. 1. 1932.Google Scholar