Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T05:57:26.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Polychaete assemblages in the south-eastern Bering Sea: linkage with groundfish distribution and diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2010

Cynthia Yeung*
Affiliation:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, 7600 Sand Point Way, NE Seattle, Washington 98115USA
Mei-Sun Yang
Affiliation:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, 7600 Sand Point Way, NE Seattle, Washington 98115USA
Robert A. McConnaughey
Affiliation:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, 7600 Sand Point Way, NE Seattle, Washington 98115USA
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: C. Yeung, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, 7600 Sand Point Way, NE Seattle, Washington 98115, USA email: cynthia.yeung@noaa.gov

Abstract

Ecological information on the polychaete community may improve habitat descriptions and distribution models of commercially important species that are polychaete-feeders. This study reports on the first new observations in nearly three decades on the polychaete assemblages in the south-eastern Bering Sea. This information was used in an exploratory assessment of the association between polychaete assemblages and environmental variables that define the benthic habitat. The spatial association between polychaete assemblages and groundfish predators was also explored for insight into whether prey assemblages influence predator distribution. Canonical correspondence analysis indicates that surficial sediment is the most important factor in organizing polychaete assemblages, over other common environmental variables such as depth and temperature. Co-correspondence analysis of the distributions of groundfish species and polychaete families does not indicate that predators are associated with specific prey families. Families that are most frequent in stomach contents of some of the fish in the analysis, mainly Maldanidae and Nephtyidae, are widely distributed across the Bering Sea shelf in diverse sediment types, as are the principal polychaete-feeders in the eastern Bering Sea such as Alaska plaice (Pleuronectes quadrituberculatus) and northern rock sole (Lepidopsetta polyxystra).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amezcua, F., Nash, R.D.M. and Veale, L. (2003) Feeding habits of the order Pleuronectiformes and its relation to the sediment type in the north Irish Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83, 593601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bland, J.M. (2000) An introduction to medical statistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, J., Randall, T. and Mroczka, M. (1997) Feeding habits of winter flounder (Pleuronectes americanus) in a habitat exposed to anthropogenic disturbance. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science 21, 6573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. (2001) Changes in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth, UK: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Coyle, K.O., Konar, B., Blanchard, A., Highsmith, R.C., Carroll, J., Carroll, M., Denisenko, S.G. and Sirenko, B.I. (2007) Potential effects of temperature on the benthic infaunal community on the southeastern Bering Sea shelf: possible impacts of climate change. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 54, 28852905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayton, P.K., Mordida, B.J. and Bacon, F. (1994) Polar marine communities. American Zoologist 34, 9099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez-Castanedo, N., Rojas-López, R., Solís-Weiss, V., Hernández-Alcántara, P. and Granados-Barba, A. (2007) The use of higher taxa to assess the benthic conditions in the southern Gulf of Mexico. Marine Ecology 28, 161168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J.I., Norkko, A. and Thrush, S.F. (2000) Broad-scale disturbance of intertidal and shallow sublittoral soft-sediment habitats; effects on the benthic macrofauna. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery 7, 5774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, J. and Kvitek, R. (1998) Effects of otter trawling on a benthic community in Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. Conservation Biology 12, 12041214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauchald, K. and Jumars, P. (1979) The diet of worms: a study of polychaete feeding guilds. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 17, 193284.Google Scholar
Feder, H.M., Day, R.H., Jewett, S.C., McCumby, K., McGee, S.G. and Schonberg, S.V. (1985) Infauna of the northeastern Bering and southeastern Chukchi Seas. United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, OCSEAP Final Report 32, 1120.Google Scholar
Folk, R.L. and Ward, W.C. (1957) Brazos River bar, a study in the significance of grain-size parameters. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 27, 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, S.M. and Rogers, S.I. (2003) A new analytical approach to the characterization of macro-benthic habitats: linking species to the environment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 56, 749764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambi, M.C., Castelli, A. and Guizzardi, M. (1997) Polychaete populations of the shallow soft bottoms off Terra Nova Bay (Ross Sea, Antarctica): distribution, diversity and biomass. Polar Biology 17, 199210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grebmeier, J., McRoy, C. and Feder, H. (1988) Pelagic–benthic coupling on the shelf of the northern Bering and Chukchi Seas. I. Food supply source and benthic biomass. Marine Ecology Progress Series 48, 5767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grebmeier, J.M., Feder, H.M. and McRoy, C.P. (1989) Pelagic–benthic coupling on the shelf of the northern Bering and Chukchi Seas. II. Benthic community structure. Marine Ecology Progress Series 51, 253268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grebmeier, J.M., Overland, J.E., Moore, S.E., Farley, E.V., Carmack, E.C., Cooper, L.W., Frey, K.E., Helle, J.H., McLaughlin, F.A. and McNutt, S.L. (2006) A major ecosystem shift in the northern Bering Sea. Science 311, 14611464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, M.B., Kaufmann, P.R., Herlihy, A.T. and Hill, B.H. (2001) Analysis of macroinvertebrate assemblages in relation to environmental gradients in rocky mountain streams. Ecological Applications 11, 489505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guisan, A. and Zimmermann, N.E. (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135, 147186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haflinger, K. (1981) A survey of benthic infaunal communities of the southeastern Bering Sea shelf. In Hood, D.W. and Calder, J.A. (eds) The Eastern Bering Sea Shelf: oceanography and resources. Seattle: University of Washington Press, pp. 10911103.Google Scholar
Himmelman, J.H. and Hamel, J.R. (1993) Diet, behaviour and reproduction of the whelk Buccinum undatum in the northern Gulf of St Lawrence, eastern Canada. Marine Biology 116, 423430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, P. (1998) Biodiversity and functioning of polychaetes in benthic sediments. Biodiversity and Conservation 7, 11331145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, A. and Ragnarsson, S.A. (2006) Feeding habits of demersal fish in Icelandic waters: a multivariate approach. ICES Journal of Marine Science 63, 16821694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, M.J. and Spencer, B.E. (1996) The effects of beam-trawl disturbance on infaunal communities in different habitats. Journal of Animal Ecology 65, 348358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenchington, E., Gordon, D.J., Bourbonnais-Boyce, C., MacIsaac, K., Gilkinson, K., McKeown, D. and Vass, W. (2005) Effects of experimental otter trawling on the feeding of demersal fish on Western Bank, Nova Scotia. American Fisheries Society Symposium 41, 391409.Google Scholar
Lauth, R. and Acuna, E. (2007) 2005 bottom trawl survey of the eastern Bering Sea continental shelf. United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, AFSC Processed Report 2007-1, 164 pp.Google Scholar
Legendre, P. and Legendre, L. (1998) Numerical ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.Google Scholar
Mahon, R. and Neilson, J. (1987) Diet changes in Scotian Shelf haddock during the pelagic and demersal phases of the first year of life. Marine Ecology Progress Series 37, 123130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCave, I.N., Bryant, R.J., Cook, H.F. and Coughanowr, C.A. (1986) Evaluation of a laser-diffraction-size analyzer for use with natural sediments. Journal of Sedimentary Research 56, 561564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnaughey, R.A. and Smith, K.R. (2000) Associations between flatfish abundance and surficial sediments in the eastern Bering Sea. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57, 24102419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, B. (1997) Influence of noisy environmental data on canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 78, 26172623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHugh, D. and Fong, P.P. (2002) Do life history traits account for diversity of polychaete annelids? Invertebrate Biology 121, 325338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, R.B., Anderson, M.J. and Zunun, G. (2005) Fitting nonlinear environmental gradients to community data: a general distance-based approach. Ecology 86, 22452251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasby-Lucas, N.M., Merle, S.G., Tissot, B.N., Embley, B.W., Hixon, M.A. and Wright, D.J. (2002) Integration of submersible transect data and high-resolution multibeam sonar imagery for a habitat-based groundfish assessment of Heceta Bank, Oregon. Fishery Bulletin 100, 739751.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1996) The Bering Sea ecosystem. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Neyman, A.A. (1963) Quantitative distribution of benthos on the shelf and upper slope of the eastern Bering Sea. In Moiseev, P.A. (ed.) Soviet fisheries investigations in the northeastern Pacific. 5. Proceedings of TINRO, Volume 50. Moscow: Pishchevaya Promyshlennost' Press, pp. 142–120. [Translated from Russian, 1968.]Google Scholar
Oksanen, J. (2004) Package ‘vegan’. Available at http://cc.oulu.fi/~jarioksa/softhelp/vegan.pdfGoogle Scholar
Olsgard, F., Brattegard, T. and Holthe, T. (2003) Polychaetes as surrogates for marine biodiversity: lower taxonomic resolution and indicator groups. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 10331049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quijón, P.A. and Snelgrove, P.V.R. (2005) Predation regulation of sedimentary faunal structure: potential effects of a fishery-induced switch in predators in a Newfoundland sub-Arctic fjord. Oecologia 144, 125136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quijón, P.A. and Snelgrove, P.V.R. (2006) The use of coarser taxonomic resolution in studies of predation on marine sedimentary fauna. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 330, 159168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, G.W. and Pleijel, F. (2001) Polychaetes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Serrano, A., Velasco, F. and Olaso, I. (2003) Polychaete annelids in the diet of demersal fish from the southern shelf of the Bay of Biscay. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83, 619623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, S. (1981) Benthic invertebrate macrofauna of the eastern Bering/Chukchi continental shelf. In Hood, D.W. and Calder, J.A. (eds) The Eastern Bering Sea Shelf: oceanography and resources. Seattle: University of Washington Press, pp. 10691090.Google Scholar
ter Braak, C.J.F. and Schaffers, A.P. (2004) Co-correspondence analysis: a new ordination method to relate two community compositions. Ecology 85, 834846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ter Braak, C.J.F. and Verdonschot, P.F.M. (1995) Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquatic Sciences 57, 255289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokranov, A. (1990) Feeding of the yellowfin sole, Limanda aspera, in the southwestern part of the Bering Sea. Journal of Ichthyology 30, 5967.Google Scholar
US Geological Survey (2000) Seabed Observation and Sampling System. United States Department of the Interior, USGS Fact Sheet FS-142-00., 2 pp. Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs142-00/fs142-00.pdfGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A.J. and Chapman, M.G. (2005) Design and analysis in benthic surveys. In Eleftheriou, A. and McIntyre, A. (eds) Methods for the study of marine benthos. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd., pp. 142.Google Scholar
Valavanis, V., Pierce, G., Zuur, A., Palialexis, A., Saveliev, A., Katara, I. and Wang, J. (2008) Modelling of essential fish habitat based on remote sensing, spatial analysis and GIS. Hydrobiologia 612, 520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinagre, C., Fonseca, V., Cabral, H. and Costa, M.J. (2006) Habitat suitability index models for the juvenile soles, Solea solea and Solea senegalensis, in the Tagus estuary: defining variables for species management. Fisheries Research 82, 140149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Włodarska-Kowalczuk, M. and Kędra, M. (2007) Surrogacy in natural patterns of benthic distribution and diversity: selected taxa versus lower taxonomic resolution. Marine Ecology Progress Series 351, 5363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, M.-S. (2003) Food habits of the important groundfishes in the Aleutian Islands in 1994 and 1997. United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, AFSC Processed Report 2003–07, 231 pp.Google Scholar
Yang, M.-S. (2007) Food habits and diet overlap of seven skate species in the Aleutian Islands. United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS–AFSC-177, 46 pp.Google Scholar
Yang, M.-S. and Livingston, P.A. (1986) Food habits and diet overlap of two congeneric species, Atheresthes stomias and Atheresthes evermanni, in the eastern Bering Sea. Fishery Bulletin 82, 615623.Google Scholar
Yeung, C. and McConnaughey, R.A. (2008) Using acoustic backscatter from a sidescan sonar to explain fish and invertebrate distributions - a case study in Bristol Bay, Alaska. ICES Journal of Marine Science 65, 242254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar