Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T10:08:48.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physical factors affecting the fate of pedal mucus produced by the common limpet Patella vulgata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Mark S. Davies ,
Hugh D. Jones  and
S. J. Hawkins
Mark S. Davies
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Manchester, Manchester, Ml 3 9PL
Hugh D. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Manchester, Manchester, Ml 3 9PL
S. J. Hawkins
Affiliation:
Port Erin Marine Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Port Erin, Isle of Man
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Physical factors affecting the fate and functional capabilities of the pedal mucus of Patella vulgata L. deposited in the intertidal have been examined. Mucus dehydration, rehydration and degradation were assessed. Mucus dehydration is dependent on ambient wind speed, temperature and relative humidity. Of these, over naturally encountered ranges, wind speed produces the greatest water loss over a 6-h period and it is surmised that mucus deposited at mid-shore will lose >60% of its water when exposed by the tide on days when the air is not still. The more dehydrated pedal mucus is, the longer it subsequently takes when immersed to reach a fully hydrated state.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , August 1992 , pp. 633 - 643
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bretz, D.D. & Dimock, R.V. Jr, 1983. Behaviorally important characteristics of the mucous trail of the marine gastropod Ilyanassa obsoleta (Say). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 71, 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calow, P., 1979. Why some metazoan mucus secretions are more susceptible to microbial attack than others. American Naturalist, 114, 149–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, V.M., 1986. The use of mucous trails by intertidal limpets to enhance food resources. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 171 548–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connor, V.M. & Quinn, J.F., 1984. Stimulation of food species growth by limpet mucus. Science, New York, 225, 843–844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, A. & Shirbhate, R., 1983. The mucus producing glands and the distribution of the cilia of the pulmonate slug Limax pseudoflavus. Journal of Zoology, 201, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.S., 1991. Studies on mucus from intertidal gastropods with reference to energy budgets. University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Davies, M.S., Hawkins, S.J. & Jones, H.D., 1990 a. Mucus production and physiological energetics in Patella vulgata L. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 56, 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.S., Jones, H.D. & Hawkins, S.J., 1990b. Seasonal variation in the composition of pedal mucus from Patella vulgata L. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 144, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.S., Jones, H.D. & Hawkins, S.J., 1992. Pedal mucus production in Littorina littorea (L.). In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Littorinid Biology (ed. J., Grahameet al.), in press.Google Scholar
Davies, P.S., 1970. Physiological ecology of Patella. IV. Environmental and limpet body temperatures. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 1069–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denny, M.W., 1980. Locomotion: the cost of gastropod crawling. Science, New York, 208, 1288–1290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denny, M.W., 1989. Invertebrate mucous secretions: functional alternatives to vertebrate paradigms. In Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology no. 43. Mucus and related topics (ed. E., Chantler and N.A., Ratcliffe), pp. 337–366. Cambridge: The Company of Biologists Ltd.Google Scholar
Edwards, S.F. & Welsh, B.L., 1982. Trophic dynamics of a mud snail(Ilyanassa obsoleta (Say)) population on an intertidal mudflat. Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science, 14, 663–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R.G., 1948. The lethal temperatures of some common British littoral molluscs, journal of Animal Ecology,, 17, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinski, W., Klekowski, R.Z. & Duncan, A., 1975. Methods for ecological energetics. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S.J. & Hartnoll, R.G., 1983. Grazing of intertidal algae by marine invertebrates. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review. London, 21, 195–282.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S.J., Watson, D.C., Hill, A.S., Harding, S.P., Kyriakides, M.A., Hutchinson, S. & Norton, T.A., 1989. A comparison of feeding mechanisms in microphagous, herbivorous, intertidal, prosobranchs in relation to resource partitioning. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 55, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herndl, G.J. & Peduzzi, P., 1989. Potential microbial utilization rates of sublittoral gastropod mucus trails. Limtwlogy and Oceanography, 34, 780–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, P.L., 1986. Energetics of Chiton pelliserpentis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1835) (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) and the importance of mucus in its energy budget. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 101, 119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J.R., 1964. The ecology of rocky shores. London: The English Universities Press.Google Scholar
Machin, J., 1964. The evaporation of water from Helix aspersa. I. The nature of the evaporating surface. Journal of Experimental Biology, 41, 759–769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meteorological Office, 1958. Tables of temperature, relative humidity and precipitation for the world. Part III. Europe and the Atlantic Ocean North of 35°N. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Page, J. & Lebens, R., 1986. Climate in the United Kingdom. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Peck, L.S., Culley, M.B. & Helm, M.M., 1987. A laboratory energy budget for the ormer Haliotis tuberculata L. journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 106, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peduzzi, P. & Herndl, G.J., 1991. Mucus trails in the rocky intertidal: a highly active microenvironment. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 75, 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, M.E., 1951. Control of humidity with potassium hydroxide, sulphuric acid, or other solutions. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 42, 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, R.H. & Robinson, R. A., 1949. Standard solutions for humidity control at 25°C. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry,41, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, I.W., 1977. Enzymes acting on bacterial surface carbohydrates. In Surface carbohydrates of the prokaryotic cell (ed. I.W., Sutherland), pp. 209–245. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tankersley, R.A., 1989. The effect of trail-following on the locomotion of the marsh periwinkle Littorina irrorata (Mesogastropoda: Littorinidae). Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 15, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A.J., 1984. The vertical distribution and seasonal abundance of intertidal microalgae on a rocky shore in New South Wales. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 78, 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, M., 1989. Marine epibiosis. I. Fouling and antifouling: some basic aspects. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 58, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Meteorological Organization, 1971. Climatological normals (clino) for climat and climat ship stations for the period 1931–1960. Geneva: WMO.Google Scholar