Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T07:05:35.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Part-IV. The Relation between Catches of Herring and Phytoplankton Collected by the Plankton Indicator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

G. T. D. Henderson ,
C. E. Lucas  and
J. H. Fraser
G. T. D. Henderson
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Oceanography, University College, Hull.
C. E. Lucas
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Oceanography, University College, Hull.
J. H. Fraser
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Oceanography, University College, Hull.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The object of these investigations, discussed in full in Part I, is an attempt to correlate the catches of the drift-net herring fishery with the conditions in the plankton at the time of fishing, and if possible to establish useful indications as to suitable and unsuitable waters for fishing. In Parts II and III the zooplankton-herring correlations in the English and Scottish fisheries have been dealt with separately. The phytoplankton material with which this section deals is not so extensive, so that the data from both fisheries will be dealt with together. The pioneer observations of Pearcey (1885) in regard to the herring, of Bullen (1908) inregard to the mackerel, and the fact that fishermen have for long regarded what they call “weedy” or “stinking” water as a bad sign for fishing, have been referred to in Part I, page 148.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , November 1936 , pp. 277 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1936

References

Bullen, G. E. 1908. Plankton Studies in relation to the Western Mackerel Fishery. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. VIII, No. 3, pp.269–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, A. C. 1923. Notes on the Atlantic Plankton taken off the east coast of England in 1921 and 1922. Publications de Circonstance, No. 78.Google Scholar
Hardy, A. C. 1924. The Herring in Relation to its Animate Environment. Part I. The Food and Feeding Habits of the Herring with Special Reference to the East Coast ofEngland. Min. of Agric. and Fish., Fish. Invest., Ser. II, VII, No. 3.Google Scholar
Hardy, A. C. 1926. The Herring in Relation to its Animate Environment. Part II. Report on trials with the Plankton Indicator. Min. of Agric. and Fish., Fish Invest., Ser. II, VIII, No. 7.Google Scholar
Hardy, A. C. 1935. In Hardy and Gunther, The Plankton of the South Georgia Whaling Grounds >and Adjacent Waters, 1926–27. Discovery Reports, Vol. XI, pp. 1–456.Google Scholar
Harvey, H. W. 1934. Annual Variation of Planktonic Vegetation, 1933. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XIX, No. 2, pp. 775–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, H. W., Cooper, L. H. N., Lebour, M. V., and Russell, F. S. 1935. Plankton Production and its Control. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XX, pp. 407–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearcey, F. G. 1885. Investigations of the Movements and Food of the Herring and Additions to the Marine Fauna of the Shetland Islands. Proc. Eoy. Soc. Edin.,VIII.Google Scholar
Savage, R. E. 1930. The Influence of Phæeeocystis on the Migrations of the Herring. Min. of Agric. and Fish., Fish. Invest., Ser. II, XII, No. 2.Google Scholar
Savage, R. E. 1931. The Relation between the Feeding of the Herring offthe East Coast of England and the Plankton of the Surrounding Waters. Min. of Agric. and Fish., Fish. Invest., Ser. II, XII, No. 3.Google Scholar
Savage, R. E., and Hardy, A. C. 1935. Phytoplankton and the Herring. Part I. Min. of Agric. and Fish., Fish. Invest., Ser. II, XIV, No. 2.Google Scholar