Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-mhpxw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:03:36.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Hydroids and Medusae Bougainvillia Pyramidata and B. Muscoides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

C. Edwards
C. Edwards
Affiliation:
The Marine Station, Millport
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The hitherto unknown hydroid of the anthomedusa Bougainvillia pyramidata has been found in the Firth of Clyde, and medusae from it have been reared to maturity. The hydroid and the stages of development of the medusa are described and figured, and the species is compared with B. ramosa. The seasonal occurrence and distribution of the medusa are discussed.

The hydroid Bougainvillia muscoides (M. Sars) has also been found in the Firth of Clyde. Medusae have been reared from it, and a description, with figures, of the stages of development is given. The specimens found in 1901 in this area and described by Browne as Thamnitis sp. are shown to be young medusae of B. muscoides. The geographical and bathymetric distribution of the species and the seasonal occurrence of the medusa are described and discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , October 1964 , pp. 725 - 752
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allman, G. J., 1871–1872. A Monograph of the Gymnoblastic or Tubularian Hydroids. xxiv + 450 pp., 23 pls. London: Ray Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beneden, P. J. Van, 1844. Recherches sur l'embryogénie des Tubulaires, et l'histoire naturelle des différents genres de cette famille qui habitent la côte d'Ostende. Mém. Acad. R. Belg. Cl. Set., T. 17, pp. 1–72, pls. 1–6.Google Scholar
Bonnevie, K., 1899a. Neue norwegische Hydroiden. Bergens Mus. Aarb., 1898, No. 5, 15 pp., 2 Pls.Google Scholar
Bonnevie, K., 1899b. Hydroida. Norweg. N. Atlant. Exped., Pt. 26, 103 pp., 8 pls., map.Google Scholar
Bonnevie, K., 1901. Hydroiden. Meeresfauna, Bergen, Heft 1, 15 pp., 1 Pl.Google Scholar
Brink, R., 1924. Notes concerning the variability and the action of environmental influences on the structure and growth of the hydroid-colony Bougainvillia ramosa (v. Ben.) Lesson, and its bearing on systematics. Proc. Acad. Sci. Amst., Vol. 27, pp. 726–33.Google Scholar
Brink, R., 1925. Beiträge zur Herstellung einer rationellen Hydroidensystematik. I. Über einige lokale Formen der Hydroidenart Bougainvillia ramosa (v. Ben.) Lesson. Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Ver., Ser. 2, Vol. 19, pp. 126–66, Pl. 6.Google Scholar
Broch, H., 1933. Zur Kenntnis der adriatischen Hydroidenfauna von Split. Skr. norske VidenskAkad., Mat.-naturv. Kl., Bd. 1, No. 4, 115 pp.Google Scholar
Browne, E. T., 1900. The fauna and flora of Valencia Harbour on the west coast of Ireland. II. Report on the medusae (1895–98). Proc. R. Irish Acad., Vol. 5, pp. 694–736, Tables 1–3.Google Scholar
Browne, E. T., 1903. Report on some medusae from Norway and Spitzbergen. Bergens Mus. Aarb., 1903, No. 4, 36 pp., 5 Pls.Google Scholar
Browne, E. T., 1905. A report on the medusae found in the Firth of Clyde (1901–1902). Proc. roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 25, pp. 738–78, Tables 1 and 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, E. T., 1907. The hydroids collected by the ‘Huxley’ from the north side of the Bay of Biscay in August, 1906. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 8, pp. 15–36, Pls. 1, 2.Google Scholar
Brückner, E., 1914. Beitrag zur Kenntnis von Perigonimus cidaritis Weismann und Gemmaria implexa var. neapolitana Hargitt. Z. wiss. Zool., Bd. III, pp. 445–505, Pls. 8, 9.Google Scholar
Dalyell, Sir J. G., 1847. Rare and Remarkable Animals of Scotland, represented from living subjects: with practical observations on their nature. Vol. 1, xii + 268 pp., 53 Pls. London: John van Voorst.Google Scholar
Edwards, C., 1958. Hydromedusae new to the British list from the Firth of Clyde. Nature, Lond., Vol. 182, pp. 1564–5.Google Scholar
Edwards, C., 1964. The hydroid of the anthomedusa Bougainvillia britannica. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 44, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Foerster, R. E., 1923. The Hydromedusae of the west coast of North America, with special reference to those of the Vancouver Island region. Contr. Canad. Biol., N.S., Vol. 1, pp. 219–77, Pls. 1–5.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. & Goodsir, J., 1851. On some remarkable marine Invertebrata new to the British seas. Trans, roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 20, pp. 307–15, Pls. 9, 10.Google Scholar
Gaarder, T., 1915. De vestlandske fjordes hydrografi. I. Surstoffet i fjordene. Bergens Mus. Aarb., 1915–16, Naturv. R., Nr. 2, 200 pp.Google Scholar
Gaarder, T., 1916. Die Hydrographie der Fjorde des westlichen Norwegens. II. Die Hydroxylzahl des Meerwassers. Bergens Mus. Aarb., 1916–17, Naturv. R., Nr. 3, 115 pp.Google Scholar
Haeckel, E., 1880. Das System der Medusen. Zweite Hälfte, pp. 361–672, Pls. 21–40. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Hallez, P., 1905. Bougainvillia fruticosa Allm. est le facies d'eau agitée du Bougainvillia ramosa van Ben. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 140, pp. 457–9.Google Scholar
Hartlaub, C., 1897. Die Hydromedusen Helgolands. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch., Abt. Helgoland, N. F., Bd. 2, Heft 1, pp. 449–536, Pls. 14–23.Google Scholar
Hartlaub, C., 1911. Craspedote Medusen. Teil 1, Lief. 2, Familie III, Margelidae. Nord. Plankt., Lief, 15, pp. 137–235.Google Scholar
Hincks, T., 1868. A History of the British Hydroid Zoophytes. Vol. 1, lxviii + 338 pp.; Vol. 2, 67 Pls. London: John van Voorst.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jäderholm, E., 1909. Northern and arctic invertebrates in the collection of the Swedish State Museum. IV. Hydroiden. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl., Bd. 45, No. 1, 124 pp., 12 Pls.Google Scholar
Kramp, P. L., 1952. Medusae collected by the Lund University Chile Expedition 1948–49. Acta Univ. lund., N.F., Bd. 47, Nr. 7, 19 pp.Google Scholar
Kramp, P. L., 1959. The Hydromedusae of the Atlantic Ocean and adjacent waters. Dana Rep., No. 46, 283 pp., 2 Pls.Google Scholar
Kramp, P. L., 1961. Synopsis of the medusae of the world. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 40, 469 pp.Google Scholar
Kramp, P. L. & Damas, D., 1925. Les Méduses de la Norvège. Introduction et Partie spéciale. I. Vidensk. Medd. dansk naturh. Foren. Kbh., Bd. 80, pp. 217–323, Pl. 35.Google Scholar
Lebedinzeff, A., 1905. Gasumtausch in abgeschlossenen Wasserbecken und seine Bedeutung für den Fischzucht. St Petersburg. [Russian, with German summary.]Google Scholar
Mill, H. R., 1894. The Clyde Sea Area. Part III. Distribution of temperature. Trans, roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 38, pp. 1–161, Pls. 1–32.Google Scholar
Nordgaard, O., 1904. Studier over naturforholdene i vestlanske f jorde. I. Hydrografi. Bergens Mus. Aarb., 1903, No. 8, 4 pp., 4 Pls.Google Scholar
Nordgaard, O., 1907. Mofjordens naturforhold. K. norske vidensk. Selsk. Skr., 1906, No. 9, 40 pp., I Pl.Google Scholar
Nordgaard, O., 1909. Studier over naturforholdene i vestlandske fjorder. II. Bergens Mus. Aarb., 1909, No. 2, 20 pp.Google Scholar
Petersen, K. W. & Vannucci, M., 1960. The life cycle of Koellikerina fasciculata (Anthomedusae, Bougainvilliidae). Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli, Vol. 31, pp. 473–92.Google Scholar
Rees, W. J., 1938. Observations on British and Norwegian hydroids and their medusae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 23, pp. 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, W. J., 1941. Medusae. Rep. Scot. mar. biol. Ass., 1940–41, pp. 11–13.Google Scholar
Rees, W. J., 1956 a. A revision of the hydroid genus Perigonimus M. Sars, 1846. Bull. Brit. Mus. (nat. Hist.), Zoology, Vol. 3, pp. 337–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, W. J., 1956 b. A revision of some northern gymnoblastic hydroids in the Zoological Museum, Oslo. Nytt. Mag. Zool., Vol. 4, pp. 109–20.Google Scholar
Runnström, S., 1932. Eine Uebersicht über das Zooplankton des Herdla- und Hjeltefjordes. Bergens Mus. Aarb., 1931, Naturv. R., Nr. 7, 67 pp.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1953. The Medusae of the British Isles: Anthomedusae, Leptomedusae, Limnomedusae, Trachymedusae and Narcomedusae. xii + 530pp., 35 Pls. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1873. Bidrag til Kundskaben om Norges Hydroider. Forh. VidenskSelsk. Krist., 1873, pp. 91–150, Pls. 2–5.Google Scholar
Sars, M., 1846. Fauna Littoralis Norvegiae, Heft I, 94 pp., 10 Pls. Christiania: Johann Dahl.Google Scholar
Segerstedt, M., 1889. Bidrag till kännedomen om hydroid-faunan vid Sveriges vestkust. Bih. svensk. VetenskAkad. Handh, Bd. 14, Afd. 4, No. 4, 27 pp., I Pl.Google Scholar
Stechow, E., 1923. Zur Kenntnis der Hydroidenfauna des Mittelmeeres, Amerikas und anderer Gebiete. II. Teil. Zool. Jb., Abt. Syst. Geogr. Biol., Bd. 47, pp. 29–270.Google Scholar
Storm, V., 1882. Bidrag til kundskab om Trondhjemsfjordens fauna. IV. Om de i Fjorden forekomne hydroide Zoophyter. K. norske vidensk. Selsk. Skr., 1881, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Strøm, K. M., 1936. Land-locked waters. Hydrography and bottom deposits in badly ventilated Norwegian fjords with remarks upon sedimentation under anaërobic conditions. Skr. norske VidenskAkad., Mat.-naturv. Kl. 1936, No. 7, 85 pp., 9 Pls.Google Scholar
Sverdrup, A., 1921. Planktonundersökelser fra Kristianiafjorden. Hydromeduser. Skr. VidenskSelsk., Christ., Mat.-naturv. Kl., 1921, No. 1, 50 pp., 4 Pls.Google Scholar
Swenander, G., 1904. Über die athecaten Hydroiden des Drontheimsfjordes. K. norske vidensk. Selsk. Skr., 1903, No. 6, 18 pp., I Pl.Google Scholar
Tambs-Lyche, H., 1954. Notes on the hydrography of Bolstadf jorden, a land-locked fjord near Bergen. Univ. Bergen Årb. naturv. R., 1954, Nr 4, 14 pp.Google Scholar
Vanhöffen, E., 1911. Die Anthomedusen und Leptomedusen der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition 1898–1899. Wiss. Ergebn. ‘Valdivia’, Bd. 19, Heft 5, pp. 191–233, Pl. 22.Google Scholar
Vanhöffen, E., 1913. Die craspedoten Medusen des ‘Vettor Pisani’. Zoologica, Stuttgart, Bd. 26, pp. 1–34, Pls. I, 2.Google Scholar
Vannucci, M. & Rees, W. J. 1961. A revision of the genus Bougainvillia (Anthomedusae). Bol. Inst. oceanogr., S. Paulo, T. II, pp. 57–100.Google Scholar