Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:00:31.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Density of Certain Amphipoda and Isopoda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

P.G. Moore ,
J. Davenport  and
N.E. Middleton
P.G. Moore
Affiliation:
University Marine Biological Station Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland, KA28 OEG.
J. Davenport
Affiliation:
University Marine Biological Station Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland, KA28 OEG.
N.E. Middleton
Affiliation:
Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Data are presented on the density of ten species of Amphipoda and two species of Isopoda from terrestrial to aquatic (freshwater through brackish water to marine) habitats, derived using a new modification of the displacement method involving batch testing of animals and subsequent Probit Analysis of data.

Surprisingly few data are available in the literature concerning the densities of marine organisms. Extensive work on this topic was published some half a century ago by A.G. Lowndes. He reported widely on crabs and lobsters (Lowndes, 1943a), echinoderms (Lowndes, 1953) and fishes (Lowndes, 1955). In his paper to the Linnean Society (Lowndes, 1938a) he included data on some of the smaller freshwater Crustacea. Gross & Raymont (1942) have published on the specific gravity of the marine copepod Calanus finmarchicus.

In espousing the displacement method for dealing with live individuals (Lowndes, 1938a,b, 1942, 1943b, 1955), he dismissed summarily earlier techniques that involved ascertaining whether killed or narcotized animals sank or floated in liquids of known density. While we recognize the limitations of the old methods, Lowndes’ displacement technique, although very accurate for individuals (he quoted figures to five decimal places), is very tedious to replicate [“elegant if somewhat exacting”, according to Hutchinson, 1967] and so reliance tends to be placed on figures obtained for very few individuals, typically only one or two. Even Lowndes himself was wary of attributing significance to the last two decimal places in his estimations, since individuals will vary in density according to sex, the contents of the gut etc. (Eyden, 1923; Lowndes, 1938b; but see Fox & Mitchell, 1953).

Type
Short Communications
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , February 1997 , pp. 253 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davenport, J., 1972. Buoyancy in Porcellana platycheles. Marine Biology, 17, 308–310.Google Scholar
Davenport, J., 1992. Observations on the ecology, behaviour, swimming mechanism and energetics of the neustonic grapsid crab, Planes minulus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 72, 611–620.Google Scholar
Davenport, J., 1994. Observations on the locomotion and buoyancy of Phronima sedentaria (Forskål, 1775) (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Hyperiidea). Journal of Natural History, 28, 787–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyden, D., 1923. Specific gravity as a factor in the vertical distribution of plankton. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. Biological Sciences, 1, 49–55.Google Scholar
Finney, D.J., 1971. Probit analysis, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, H.M. & Mitchell, Y., 1953. Relation of the rate of antennal movement in Daphnia to the number of eggs carried in the brood pouch. Journal of Experimental Biology, 30, 238–242.Google Scholar
Gross, F. & Raymont, J.E.G., 1942. The specific gravity of Calanus finmarchicus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh B, 61, 288–296.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G.E., 1967. A treatise on limnology. Vol. II. Introduction to lake biology and the limnoplankton. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lippai, C., 1987. Locomotion in British portunid crabs. MSc thesis, University of Wales.Google Scholar
Lowndes, A.G., 1938a. The density of some living aquatic organisms. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, session no. 150, 1937–38, Pt 2, 25 March 1938, 62–73.Google Scholar
Lowndes, A.G., 1938b. Density of living aquatic organisms. Nature, London, 141, 289–290.Google Scholar
Lowndes, A.G., 1942. The displacement method of weighing living aquatic organisms. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 25, 555–574.Google Scholar
Lowndes, A.G., 1943a. Density of crabs and lobsters. Nature, London, 151, 336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowndes, A.G., 1943b. Some applications of the displacement method of weighing living aquatic organisms. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, series A, 113, 28–43.Google Scholar
Lowndes, A.G., 1953. The densities of some common Echinodermata from Plymouth. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 12, 6, 623–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowndes, A.G., 1955. Density of fishes. Some notes on the swimming of fish to be correlated with density, sinking factor and load carried. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 12, 8, 241–256.Google Scholar
Unesco, , 1981. Tenth report of the joint panel on oceanographic tables and standards. Unesco Technical Papers in Marine Science, 36, 25 pp.Google Scholar
Wong, Y.M. & Moore, P.G., 1995. Biology of feeding in the scavenging isopod Natatolana borealis (Isopoda: Cirolanidae), Ophelia, 43, 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar