Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T06:32:50.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on the Effects of Changes of Hydrostatic Pressure on the Behaviour of Some Marine Animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. L. Rice
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Station, Port Erin, Isle of Man

Extract

An apparatus and experimental method for the investigation of the effects of changes of pressure on the behaviour of marine animals is described.

In 43 of a total of 53 species examined in this apparatus definite responses to abrupt pressure changes of 1000 millibars or less have been observed, increased pressure generally causing increased activity and movement upwards or towards the light, and decreased pressure causing decreased activity and movement downwards or away from the light. The relative importance of light and gravity in the orientation of these movements is generally correlated with the degree of development of the light and gravity receptors in the species concerned.

The possible significance of these pressure responses in nature is discussed and it is suggested that pressure may be an important factor affecting the distribution of marine plankton, particularly during the hours of darkness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baylor, E. R. & Smith, F. E., 1957. Diurnal migration in plankton crustaceans. In B. T. Scheer (ed): Recent Advances in Invertebrate Physiology, pp. 2135. University of Oregon Publications.Google Scholar
Bayne, B. L., 1963. Responses of Mytilus edulis larvae to increases in hydrostatic pressure. Nature, Lond., Vol. 198, p. 406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buddenbrock, W. Von, 1914. Über die Orientierung der Krebse im Raum. Zool. Jb. (Abt. allg. Zool. Physiol.), Bd. 34, pp. 479514.Google Scholar
Enright, J. T., 1961. Pressure sensitivity of an amphipod. Science, N.S., Vol. 133, pp. 758–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enright, J. T., 1962. Responses of an amphipod to pressure changes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Vol. 7, pp. 131–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, R., 1902. The metamorphosis of Corystes cassivelaunus (Pennant). Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 46, pp. 461–78.Google Scholar
Gurney, R., 1927. Report on the larvae of the Crustacea Decapoda. In the Zoological results of the Cambridge expedition to the Suez Canal. Trans, zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 22, pp. 231–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, R., 1935. Notes on some decapod Crustacea of Bermuda. I. The larvae of Leptochela and Latreutes. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., 1936, pp. 785–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, R., 1939. The late larval stage of the Sargassum prawn, Leander tenuicornis (Say), and a note on the statocyst of the adult. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. II, Vol. 3, pp. 120–26.Google Scholar
Harden-Jones, F. R. & Marshall, N. B., 1953. The structure and functions of the teleostean swim bladder. Biol. Rev., Vol. 28, pp. 1683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, A. C. & Bainbridge, R., 1951. Effect of pressure on the behaviour of decapod larvae. Nature, Lond., Vol. 168, pp.327–28.Google Scholar
Hardy, A. C. & Paton, N., 1947. Experiments on the vertical migrations of planktonic animals. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 26, pp. 467526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, J. E., 1953. Physical factors involved in the vertical migration of plankton. Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 94, pp. 537–50.Google Scholar
Harris, J. E., 1963. The role of endogenous rhythms in vertical migration. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 153–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horstmann, E., 1934. Untersuchungen zur Physiologie der Schwimmbewegungen der Scyphomedusae. Pflüg. Arch. ges. Physiol., Bd. 234, pp. 406–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W. & Qasim, S. Z., 1955. Responses of some marine planktonic animals to changes in hydrostatic pressure. Nature, Lond., Vol. 175, p. 941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, S. M. & Orr, A. P., 1955. The Biology of a Marine Copepod. 188 pp. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B., Owre, H., Jones, E. C. & Dow, T., 1953. Plankton of the Florida current. II. Siphonophora. Bull. mar. Sci. Gulf Caribb., Vol. 2, pp. 559–73.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B., Owre, H., Jones, E. C. & Dow, T., 1955. Variations in temperature and light response within a plankton population. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole, Vol. 108, pp. 175–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B. & Corwin, E. G., 1956. The effects of temperature, illumination and pressure on the vertical distribution of zooplankton. Bull. mar. Sci. Gulf Caribb., Vol. 6, pp. 273–87.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B., Owre, H., Jones, E. C. & Dow, T., 1953. Plankton of the Florida current. III. The control of vertical distribution of zooplankton in the daytime by light and temperature. Bull. mar. Sci. Gulf Caribb., Vol. 3, pp. 8395.Google Scholar
Prentiss, C. W., 1901. The otocyst of decapod Crustacea, its structure, development and functions. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harvard, Vol. 36, pp. 167281.Google Scholar
Qasim, S. Z. & Knight-Jones, E. W., 1957. Further investigations on the pressure responses of marine animals. Rep. Challenger Soc., Vol. 3, p. 21.Google Scholar
Rice, A. L. 1961. The responses of certain mysids to changes of hydrostatic pressure. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 38, pp. 391401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, A. L. 1962. Responses of Calanus finmarchicus (Gunnerus) to changes of hydrostatic pressure. Nature, Lond., Vol. 194, pp. 1189–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M. T., 1903. The metamorphosis of the hermit crab. Proc. Boston Soc. nat. Hist., Vol. 31, pp. 147209.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. & Crisp, D. J., 1947. Studies on plastron respiration. III. The orientation responses of Aphelocheirus in relation to plastron respiration; together with an account of specialised pressure receptors in aquatic insects. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 24, pp. 310–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar