Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-25T18:35:08.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Observations Upon Members of the Genus Chrysotila Anand, with Remarks Upon their Relationships within the Haptophyceae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. C. Green  and
Mary Parke
J. C. Green
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth
Mary Parke
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent paper, Green & Parke (1974) drew attention to some of the systematic problems posed by benthic members of the Haptophyceae. Particular attention was given to Ruttnera spectabilis Geitler (1942) the type species of its genus, which was shown by the fine structure of the zoids to be a member of the Haptophyceae with a characteristic rudimentary haptonema and not, as had been thought previously, a member of the Chrysophyceae (sensu Christensen, 1962). Attention was also drawn to the close similarities between R. spectabilis and Chrysotila lamellosa Anand (1937) both in the vegetative and motile phases, but no formal taxonomic changes were made pending the completion of the comparative reinvestigation of both these species together with C. stipitata Anand, the type species of the genus Chrysotila (so designated by Bourrelly, 1957).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , March 1975 , pp. 109 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anand, P. L., 1937. A taxonomic study of the algae of British chalk-cliffs. Journal of Botany, British and Foreign, 75, suppl. II, 1–51.Google Scholar
Billard, C. & Gayral, P., 1972. Two new species of Isochrysis with remarks on the genus Ruttnera. British Phycological Journal, 7, 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boney, A. D. & Burrows, A. 1966. Experimental studies on the benthic phases of Haptophyceae. I. Effects of some experimental conditions on the release of coccolithophorids. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 46, 295–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourrelly, P., 1957. Recherches sur les Chrysophycees. Morphologie, Phylogénie, Systématique. Revue Algologique. Mémoire Hors-Série, 1, 1–412.Google Scholar
Bourrelly, P., 1968. Les Algues d'Eau Douce. II. Les Alguesjaunes et Brunes. 438 pp. Paris:Boubée.Google Scholar
Bourrelly, P. & Denizot, M., 1967. Quelques algues marines des niveaux élevés de la falaise d'Étretat (Seine-Maritime). Botaniste, 50, 43–57.Google Scholar
Christensen, T., 1962 (2nd edition, 1966). Alger. In: Botanik, eds. T.W., Bocher, M., Lange & T., Sorensen. 2 (Systematisk Botanik), Nr. 2, Udg. 2, 178 pp.Google Scholar
Dangeard, P.-A., 1934. Mémoire sur Apistonema submarinum sp. nov. et considérations générates sur la Structure des Protozoaires et des Protophytes. Botaniste, 26, 261–344.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1959. Sur les nannofossiles calcaires et leur systématique. Revue de Micropalaéonto-logie, 2, 127–52.Google Scholar
Ettl, H., 1965. Die Algenflora des Schonhengstes und seiner Umgebung. II. Nova Hedwigia, 10, 121–59.Google Scholar
Gardet, M., 1955. Contribution a l'etude des coccolithes des terrains neogenes de Palgerie. Publications du Service de la carte geologique de l'Algerie, 5, 479–550.Google Scholar
Geitler, L., 1942. Neue luftlebige Algen aus Wien. Osterreichische botanische Zeitschrift, 91, 49–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geitler, L., 1943. Eine neue atmophytische Chrysophycee, Ruttnera spectabilis, nov. gen., nova spec. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie u Hydrographie, 43, 100–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. C. & Parke, M., 1974. A reinvestigation by light and electron microscopy of Ruttnera spectabilis Geitler (Haptophyceae), with special reference to the fine structure of the swarmers. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 539–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaveness, D., 1972. Coccolithus huxleyi (Lohm.) Kamptn. II. The flagellate cell, aberrant cell types, vegetative propagation and life-cycles. British Phycological Journal, 7, 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leadbeater, B. S. C., 1970. Preliminary observations on differences of scale morphology at various stages in the life cycle of ‘Apistonema-Syracosphaera’ sensu von Stosch. British Phycological Journal, 5, 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leadbeater, B. S. C., 1971. Observations on the life history of the haptophycean alga Pleurochrysis scherffelii with special reference to the microanatomy of the different types of motile cells. Annals of Botany, 35, 429–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leadbeater, B. S. C. & Manton, I., 1969. Chrysochromulina camella sp. nov. and C. cymbium sp. nov., two new relatives of C. strobilus Parke & Manton. Archiv für Mikrobiologie, 68, 116–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefort, F., 1971. Sur l'appartenance à une seule et même espèce de deux Coccolithophoracėes, Cricosphaera carterae et Ochrosphaera verrucosa. Compte rendu hebdomadaire des séances de l'Académie des sciences, 272, 2540–43.Google Scholar
Magne, F., 1957. Sur un biotope marin favorable aux Chrysophycées benthiques. Compte rendu hebdomadaire des séances de l'academic des sciences, 245, 983–5.Google Scholar
Manton, I., 1972. Preliminary observations on Chrysochromulina mactra sp. nov. British Phyco-logical Journal, 7, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. & Leedale, G. F., 1961. Further observations on the fine structure of Chrysochromulina minor and C. kappa with special reference to the pyrenoids. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 41, 519–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. & Leedale, G. F., 1963. Observations on the micro-anatomy of Crystallolithus hyalinus Gaarder & Markali. Archiv für Mikrobiologie, 47, 115–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papenfuss, G. F., 1955. Classification of the Algae. In: A Century of Progress in the Natural Sciences, 1853–1953, 115–224. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Parke, M., 1949. Studies on marine flagellates. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 28, 255–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M., 1961. Some remarks concerning the class Chrysophyceae. British Phycological Bulletin, 2, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M., 1971. The production of calcareous elements by benthic algae belonging to the class Haptophyceae (Chrysophyta). In: Proceedings of the II Planktonic Conference, Rome 1970, ed. A., Farinacci, 2, 929–37. Rome: Edizioni Tecnoscienza.Google Scholar
Parke, M. & Dixon, P. S., 1964. A revised check-list of British marine algae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 44, 499–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Dixon, P. S., 1968. Check-list of British marine algae - second revision. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 48, 783–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, B. C. & Diboll, A. G., 1966. Alcian stains for histochemical localization of acid and sulfated polysaccharides in algae. Phycologia, 6, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascher, A., 1925. Die braune Algenreihe der Chrysophyceen. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 52, 489–564.Google Scholar
Pascher, A., 1931. Eine braune, aërophile Gallertalge und ihre Einrichtungen für die Verbreitung durch den Wind. Beihefte zum Botanischen Zentralblatt, 47, 325–45.Google Scholar
Pringsheim, E. G., 1955. Kleine Mitteilungen Uber Flagellaten und Algen. I. Algenartige Chrysophyceen in Reinkultur. Archiv für Mikrobiologie, 21, 401–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stosch, H. A. Von, 1955. Ein morphologischer Phasenwechsel bei einer Coccolithophoride. Die Naturwissenschaften, 42, 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stosch, H. A. Von, 1958. Der Geisselapparat einer Coccolithophoride. Die Naturwissenschaften, 45, 140–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stosch, H. A. Von, 1967. Haptophyceae. In: Vegetative Fortpflanzung, Parthogenese und Apogamie bei Algen, ed. W., Ruhland, Encyclopaedia of Plant Physiology, 18, 646–56. Berlin, Gottingen and Heidelberg.Google Scholar