Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T21:48:06.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Meiobenthos of Sub-Littoral Muds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. D. McIntyre
Affiliation:
Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen

Summary

Meiobenthos, here defined as metazoans passing through a ½ mm screen, is described from core samples collected on muddy grounds at 100-140 m depth in the North Sea and off the west coast of Scotland between February 1962 and August 1963.

Sixteen cores of 2·2 cm diameter were collected from Loch Nevis, and 14 from the Fladen ground. The top 7 cm of each core was passed through a 500μ then a 76μ screen. The residues were examined entire, and the nitrate of the finest mesh was subsampled.

The fauna consisted mainly of nematodes, kinorhynchs, ostracods, copepods, polychaetes, and lamellibranchs. Between 61 and 97 % of the population consisted of nematodes, but copepods were second in importance and were more abundant than recorded on other subtidal grounds.

The fine mesh (76μ) retained almost all specimens of every animal group except Nematoda. Numerically 38% of the nematode population passed through the fine sieve, but this represented only 18% by weight.

The mean dry weight of meiobenthos on Fladen was calculated as 0·76 g/m2 and the average number of individuals was 196 × 104/m2.

In Loch Nevis the corresponding weight was 1·28 g and the number 101 × 104. The loch had a larger and more varied population of all groups except nematodes, which were particularly abundant on Fladen.

The data do not indicate significant population fluctuations throughout the year in the permanent meiobenthos.

Compared with other subtidal grounds Nevis and Fladen seem to support much richer populations, and the high values for Fladen are of particular interest since this is a poor macrobenthos area.

An attempt is made to indicate the possible level of meiobenthos productivity and it is suggested that there may be competition between meio- and macrobenthos for available organic matter which could result in a less efficient production of fish food.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beklemishev, R. V., 1962. Superfluous feeding of marine herbivorous plankton. Paper No. 17 in Contributions to Symposium on Zooplankton Production 1961. Rapp. Cons. Explor. Mer, Vol. 153, pp. 108–13.Google Scholar
Bougis, P., 1946. Analyse quantitative de la microfaune d'une vase marine a Banyuls. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 222, pp. 1122–4.Google Scholar
Bougis, P., 1950. Méthode pour l'etude quantitative de la microfaune des fonds marins (Meiobenthos). Vie et Milieu, T. 1, pp. 2338.Google Scholar
Krogh, A. & Spärck, R., 1936. On a new bottom-sampler for investigation of the micro fauna of the sea bottom. K. danske vidensk. Selsk., Biol. Medd., Bd. 13, 4, pp. 112.Google Scholar
McIntyre, A. D., 1961. Quantitative differences in the fauna of boreal mud associations. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 41, pp. 599616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mare, M. F., 1942. A study of a marine benthic community with special reference to the micro-organisms. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 25, pp. 517–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monniot, F., 1962. Recherches sur les graviers à Amphioxus de la région de Banyulssur-Mer. Vie et Milieu, T. 13, pp. 232322.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1931. The muds of the Clyde Sea area. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 17, pp. 325–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purasjoki, K. J., 1947. Quantitative Untersuchung ueber die Mikro-fauna des Meeresbodens in der Umgebung der Zoologischen Station Tvärminne an der Südküste Finnlands. Soc. Scient. Fenn. Comm. Biol., Vol. 9, 14, pp. 124.Google Scholar
Remane, A. 1933. Verteilung und Organisation der Benthonischen Mikrofauna der Kieler Bucht. Wiss. Meeresunters., N.F., Bd. 21, pp. 161221.Google Scholar
Sanders, H. L., 1956. Oceanography of Long Island Sound, 1952–1954. X. Biology of marine bottom communities. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll., Vol. 15, 345414.Google Scholar
Slobodkin, L. B., 1962. Growth and Regulation of Animal Populations. 184 pp. New York: Holt Rinehart-Winston.Google Scholar
Smidt, E. L. B., 1951. Animal production in the Danish Waddensea. Medd. Danm. Fisk. Havundersøg., Bd. 11, Nr 6, 151 pp.Google Scholar
Steele, J. H., 1956. Plant production on the Fladen ground. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 35, pp. 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, J. H., 1964. Some problems in the study of marine resources. Contribution No. C-4 to ICNAF Environmental Symposium, Rome 1964.Google Scholar
Wieser, W., 1960. Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay II. The meiofauna. Limnol. Oceanogr., Vol. 5, pp. 121137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar