Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T19:30:55.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Illustrated Key to Ampelisca Species from the North-Eastern Atlantic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Jean-Claude Dauvin  and
Denise Bellan-Santini
Jean-Claude Dauvin
Affiliation:
Station Biologique, CNRS-LP 4601 et Université P. & M. Curie (Paris VI), 29211 Roscoff, France
Denise Bellan-Santini
Affiliation:
Station Marine d'Endoume, rue Batterie des Lions, 13007 Marseille, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The genus Ampelisca comprises more than 150 species and is one of the more important benthic genus of marine amphipods. New species are regularly added (Barnard & Agard 1986; Bellan-Santini & Marques, 1986; Goeke, 1987). Ampelisca are found from the intertidal zone to abyssal depths but most of them live on the continental shelf. In spite of many studies, it is often difficult to distinguish some species which are morphologically similar. In the last ten years, twenty-two species have been described from the north-eastern Atlantic (BellanSantini & Kaïm-Malka, 1977; Bellan-Santini & Dauvin, 1981, 1986; Dauvin & Bellan-Santini, 1982, 1985; Bellan-Santini & Marques, 1986). Materials come from MNHN of Paris collection, collected by Chevreux (1894–1924) (Dauvin & Bellan-Santini, 1985, 1986) and specimens collected during the last 25 years. All these new species are described from the Atlantic coast from northern Brittany to the Sahara and from the Mediterranean Sea.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 68 , Issue 4 , November 1988 , pp. 659 - 676
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnard, J. L., 1960. New bathyal and sublittoral ampeliscid amphipods from California, with an illustrated key to Ampelisca. Pacific Naturalist, 1 (16), 1–36.Google Scholar
Barnard, J. L. & Agard, B. R., 1986. A new species of Ampelisca (Crustacea, Amphipoda) from Trinidad. Bulletin of Marine Science, 39, 630–636.Google Scholar
Bellan-Santini, D., 1982. Family Ampeliscidae. Mémoires de l'Institut océanographique, Monaco, 13 (1), 19–69.Google Scholar
Bellan-Santini, D., 1983. Distribution des Ampelisca (Crustacea, Amphipoda) de Méditerranée. In Selected Papers on Crustacea (ed. Rabindranath, P.), pp. 151–161. India: N. Krishna Pillai Farewell Committee, The Aquarium, Trivandrum.Google Scholar
Bellan-Santini, D. & Dauvin, J. C., 1981. Description d'une nouvelle espèce d'Ampelisca des côtes françaises (Amphipoda). Crustaceana, 40, 242–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellan-Santini, D. & Dauvin, J. C., 1986. Ampelisca remora (Crustacea, Amphipoda): une nouvelle espèce des côtes de Galice (Atlantique Nord Est). Crustaceana, 51, 38—48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellan-Santini, D. & Dauvin, J. C., 1987. Eléments de synthèse sur les Ampelisca du nord-est Atlantique. Crustaceana, supplement 13, 20–60.Google Scholar
Bellan-Santini, D. & Kaïm-Malka, R., 1977. Ampelisca nouvelles de Méditerranée (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Bollettino del Museo civico di storia naturale di Verona, 4, 479—523.Google Scholar
Bellan-Santini, D. & Marques, J. C., 1986. Une nouvelle espèce d'Ampelisca (Crustacea Amphipoda) des côtes du Portugal (Atlantique Nord-Est): Ampelisca lusitanica n.sp. Cahiers de biologic marine, 27, 153–162.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E., 1887. Crustacés Amphipodes dragués par l'Hirondelle pendant sa campagne de 1886. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France, 12, 566–580.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E., 1925. Voyage de la goélette Melita aux Canaries et au Senegal (1889–1890). Amphipodes. I. Gammariens. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France, 50, 278–311.Google Scholar
Dauvin, J. C. & Bellan-Santini, D., 1982. Description de deux nouvelles espèces d'Ampelisca des côtes françhises atlantiques (Crustacea - Amphipoda): Ampelisca toulemonti n.sp. et Ampelisca spooneri n.sp. Cahiers de biologie marine, 23, 253—268.Google Scholar
Dauvin, J. C. & Bellan-Santini, D., 1985. Collection des Ampeliscidés d'Edourd Chevreux du Muséum National d'Histoire naturelle: description d'Ampelisca melitae et d'A. monoculata n.spp. et redescription d'A. verga Reid. Bulletin du Muséum national d'histoire naturelle (sér. 4), 7A, 659–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauvin, J. C. & Bellan-Santini, D., 1986. Revision de la collection des Ampeliscidés (Crustacea, Amphipoda) d'Edouard Chevreux au Muséum national d'Histoire Naturelle. Bulletin du Muséum national d'histoire naturelle (sér. 4), 8A, 867–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, J. J., 1982. The systematics and distributional ecology of the family Ampeliscidae (Amphipoda: Gammaridea) in the Northeastern Pacific region. 1. The genus Ampelisca. Publications in Biological Oceanography, National Museum of Canada, no. 10, 39 pp.Google Scholar
Goeke, G. D., 1987. Amphipodes of the family Ampeliscidae (Gammaridea) VI. Ampelisca macrodonta, a new species from the Falkland Islands. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 100, 4–7.Google Scholar
Lincoln, R. J., 1979. British Marine Amphipoda: Gammaridea. London: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Mateus, A. & Mateus, E., 1986. Campagne de la ‘Calypso’ dans le golfe de Guinée et aux îles Principe, Sao Tomé et Annobon (1956). Amphipodes rècoltés à bord de la ‘Calypso’. Anais da Faculdade de ciências do Porto, 66, 126–223.Google Scholar
Reid, D. M., 1951. Report of the Amphipoda (Gammaridea and Caprellidea) of the coast of Tropical West Africa. Atlantide Report, 2, 189–291.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, A., 1925. Crustacea. VIII. Amphipoda. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Meeresfauna Westafrikas, 3, 113–204.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Michener, C. D., 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Kansas University Science Bulletin, 38, 1409–1438.Google Scholar