Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T03:35:58.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Hydroids and Medusae Sarsia Occulta Sp.Nov., Sarsia Tubulosa and Sarsia Loveni

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

C. Edwards
C. Edwards
Affiliation:
Dunstaffnage Marine Research Laboratory, Oban, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The discovery of a new species of Sarsia hydroid and its medusa and a comparison of this species with Sarsia tubulosa (M. Sars) and S. loveni (M. Sars) have resolved a longstanding problem. In his detailed account of the hydroid and medusa Coryne mirabilis (now accepted as identical and synonymous with Sarsia tubulosa), Louis Agassiz (1860-2, vol. 4, pp. 189-90, 203-4, P's- 17J i8) asserted that it undergoes a change of reproduction in winter and spring. He stated that in late winter the hydroid releases medusae but that in spring the gonophores no longer develop into normal medusae, being retained on the hydranths where they become sexually mature without mouth and tentacles. He based his conclusions on a series of hydroid colonies collected on the shore. Allman (1871-2, pp. 278-9) was strongly disinclined to accept Agassiz's assertion of the specific identity of the two forms of gonophore without stronger evidence, saying that, until the two kinds were found simultaneously or in succession on one colony kept under close observation in an aquarium, the identity of the two forms could not be accepted as proved. Mayer (1910, p. 55), from personal observation of colonies collected on the coast of Massachusetts, came to the same conclusion as Agassiz, but he did not say whether he had followed the succession in an aquarium or had observed one colony throughout, and accordingly his conclusion is subject to the same criticism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , May 1978 , pp. 291 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agassiz, L. 1849. Contributions to the natural history of the Acalephae of North America. Part I. On the naked-eye medusae of the shores of Massachusetts, in their perfect state of development. Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 4, 221–316, pls. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agassiz, L. 1860–1862. Contributions to the Natural History of the United States of America. Second Monograph, Vol. 3, 1860, 301 pp., pls. 1–19; Vol. 4, 1862, 380 pp., pls. 20–35. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Allman, G. J. 1871–1872. A Monograph of the Gymnoblastic or Tubularian Hydroids. 450 pp. London: Ray Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrill, N. J. 1953. Growth and form in gymnoblastic hydroids. VII. Growth and reproduction in Syncoryne and Coryne. Journal of Morphology, 92, 273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartlaub, C. 1907. Craspedote Medusen. Teil I, Leif. 1: Codoniden und Cladonemiden. Nordisches Plankton, 12, 1–135.Google Scholar
Hartlaub, C. 1916. Ueber das Altern einer Kolonie von Syncoryne und damit verbundene Knospungen am Hydranthenköpfchen. Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen der Kom-mission zur wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung der deutschen Meere (Abteilung Helgoland), 11, 91–125, pls. 19, 20.Google Scholar
Hartlaub, C. 1917. Craspedote Medusen. Teil I, Lief. 4: Familie V, Williadae (und Anhang). Nordisches Plankton, 12, 365–479.Google Scholar
Hincks, R. 1868. A History of the British Hydroid Zoophytes, vol. 1, 338 pp.; vol 2, 67 pls. London: John van Voorst.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramp, P. L. 1926. Medusae. Part II. Anthomedusae. Danish Ingolf-Expedition, 5 (10), 105 pp., 2 pls.Google Scholar
Kramp, P. L. 1927. The Hydromedusae of the Danish waters. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter, (Naturvidensk. mathem. Afd), Raekke 8, 12 (1), 1–291.Google Scholar
Kühl, H. 1962. Die Hydromedusen der Elbmundung. Abhandlungen und Verhandlungen des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg, 6, 209–232, pls. 5, 6.Google Scholar
Lesson, R.-P. 1843. Histoire Naturelle des Zoophytes. Acalephes. 596 pp. Paris: Nouvelles Suites à Buffon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovén, S. L. 1836. Bidrag till kännedomen af slägtena Campanularia och Syncoryna. Kungliga Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar, 1835, 260–281, pls. 6–8. [Consulted in German translation: Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Gattungen Campanularia und Syncoryne. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 3, 1837, 249–262, 321–326, pl. 6.]Google Scholar
Mayer, A. G. 1910. Medusae of the World, vol. 1. 230 pp. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institution.Google Scholar
Naumov, D. V. 1960. Gidroidy i gidromeduzy morskikh, solonovatovodnykh i prestnovodnykh basseinov SSSR. Opredeliteli po faune SSSR, izdavaemye Zoologicheskim muzeem Akademii nauk, 70, 585 pp.Google Scholar
Robson, J. H. 1914. Catalogue of the Hydrozoa of the north-east coast. Report of the Dove Marine Laboratory, Cullercoats, Northumberland, 3, 87–103, pl. 3.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S. 1953. The Medusae of the British Isles: Anthomedusae, Leptomedusae, Limnomedusae, Trachymedusae and Narcomedusae. 530 pp. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sars, M. 1835. Beskrivelser og lagttagelser over nogle maerkelige eller nye i Havet vedden Bergenske Kyst levende Dyr af Polypernes, Acalephernes, Radiaternes, Annelidernes og Molluskernes Classer. 81 pp.; 15 pls. Bergen.Google Scholar
Sars, M. 1846. Fauna Littoralis Norvegiae. Heft 1. 94 pp, 10 pls. Christiania: Johann Dahl.Google Scholar
Werner, B. 1963a. Experimentelle Beobachtungen über die Wirksamkeit von Aussenfaktoren in der Entwicklung der Hydrozoen und Erörterung ihrer Bedeutung für die Evolution. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Meeresforschung in Bremerhaven, Sonderband, Drittes meeresbiologisches Symposion, 153–177.Google Scholar
Werner, B. 1963b. Effect of some environmental factors on differentiation and determination in marine Hydrozoa, with a note on their evolutionary significance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 105, 461–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, T. S. 1857. Observations on British zoophytes. I. Coryne gravata. Proceedings of the Royal Physical Society of Edinburgh, 1, 338–340, pl. 19.Google Scholar