Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T08:57:48.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gregariousness during settlement in the barnacle Elminius modestus Darwin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

E. W. Knight-Jones
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex
J. P. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

Extract

A gregarious tendency during settlement, similar to that already demonstrated in oyster larvae, was suspected in Elminius, because cyprids settled in groups during the initial stages of colonization of surfaces (crowded later arrivals showed a spacing-out tendency) and because settlement on test-plates was peculiarly sparse at stations with a muddy bottom, where barnacles were absent.

Settlement was much heavier on areas of smooth glass, which already bore recently settled barnacles, than on similar adjoining areas which were bare.

When barnacled microscope slides were stuck to one set of glass plates, bare slides to another and the two sets exposed side by side, settlement was consistently much heavier on the plates which bore the barnacled slides. The mean density of settlement on the bare slides and the surrounding plates was uniformly low, except for a greater density immediately adjoining the slides, probably due to sheltering alongside their edges. On the barnacled slides density of settlement was much higher and on the plates immediately alongside still more so, whilst at increasing distances from the slides it became gradually smaller but was still much heavier than on the plates with the bare slides. This suggests that the sensory basis for gregariousness can act at a distance. It may possibly be olfactory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burton, M., 1949. Observations on littoral sponges, including the supposed swarming of larvae, movement and coalescence in mature individuals, longevity and death. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, Vol. 118, pp. 893915.Google Scholar
Cole, H. A. & Knight-Jones, E. W., 1939. Some observations and experiments on the setting behaviour of larvae of Ostrea edulis. Journ. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 14, pp. 86105.Google Scholar
Cole, H. A. & Knight-Jones, E. W., 1949. The setting behaviour of larvae of the European flat oyster, Ostrea edulis L., and its influence on methods of cultivation and spat collection. Fish. Invest., Ser. 11, Vol. 17, No. 3.Google Scholar
Colman, J., 1933. The nature of the intertidal zonation of plants and animals. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 18, pp. 435–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalido, P., 1948. L'huitre de Morbihan. Paris.Google Scholar
Darwin, C., 1854. A monograph of the Sub-class Cirripedia. II. The Balanidae, the Verrucidae. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Eales, N. B., 1939. The Littoral Fauna of Great Britain. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grave, C., 1941. Further studies on the metamorphosis of ascidian larvae. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, Vol. 81, pp. 286–7.Google Scholar
Grave, C. & Nicoll, P. A., 1940. Studies of larval life and metamorphosis in Ascidia nigra and species of Polyandrocarpa. Pap. Tortugas Lab. Wash., Vol. 32, pp. 146.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, J. G., 18631869. British Conchology. London.Google Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W., 1948. Elminius modestus: another imported pest of east coast oyster beds. Nature, Vol. 161, p. 201.Google Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W., 1949. Aspects of the setting behaviour of larvae of Ostrea edulis on Essex oyster beds. Report to the Special Scientific Meeting on Shellfish of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Edinburgh, 10 1949.Google Scholar
Miller, M. A., Rapean, J. C. & Whedon, W. F., 1948. The role of slime film in the attachment of fouling organisms. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, Vol. 94, pp. 143–57.Google Scholar
Pyefinch, K. A. & Downing, F. S., 1949. Notes on the general biology of Tubularia larynx Ellis and Solander. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 28, pp. 2143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spärck, R., 1949. Fluctuations in the stock of oysters (Ostrea edulis) in the Limfjord in recent times. Report to the Special Scientific Meeting on Shellfish of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Edinburgh, 10 1949.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates, with special reference to the planktonic larvae in the Sound (Øresund). Medd. Komm. Danmarks Fisk. Havunde., Ser. Plankton, Bd. 4, Nr. I, 523 pp.Google Scholar
Visscher, J. P., 1928. Reactions of the cyprid larvae of barnacles at the time of attachment. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, Vol. 54, pp. 327–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar