Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-28T23:47:01.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generic Circumscription in the Family Ectocarpaceae (Phaeophyceae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

G. Russell  and
D. Garbary
G. Russell
Affiliation:
Hartley Botanical Laboratories, The University, Liverpool L BX
D. Garbary
Affiliation:
Hartley Botanical Laboratories, The University, Liverpool L BX
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The family Ectocarpaceae currently contains the simplest, and probably also the most primitive, members of the Phaeophyceae. The thallus form of every species is a heterotrichous filament with little or no structural modification. Some species may possess quite extensive cortication of axial filaments by adventitious rhizoids but advanced pseudoparenchyma is never formed. Periclinal cell divisions within filaments have also been reported, particularly in the course of sporangium development, but true parenchyma is unknown. Growth of the erect system of filaments is diffuse, for although intercalary sites of relatively active cell division may sometimes be observed, these lack the permanence of position and sustained activity of true intercalary meristems. The growth of the horizontal branch system is probably mainly apical, but is also too diffuse to be considered meristematic. Sporangia and gametangia are formed from vegetative cells and occur either as intercalary structures within filaments or as modified branch apices. Sexual fusion of gametes may be isogamous or anisogamous.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , May 1978 , pp. 517 - 525
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bory De St Vincent, J. B. G. M. 1823. Pilayella. In Dictionnaire Classique d' Histoire Naturelle, vol. 4, p. 393. Paris.Google Scholar
Lyngbye, H. C. 1819. Tentamen Hydrophytologiae Danicae. 248 pp. Hafniae.Google Scholar
Parke, M. & Dixon, P. S. 1976. Check-list of British marine algae - third revision. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 527–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, G. 1977. Environment and form in the discrimination of taxa in brown algae. In Modern Approaches to the Taxonomy of Red and Brown Algae (ed. D. E. G. Irvine and J. H. Price). London: Academic Press. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Russell, G. & Fletcher, R. L. 1975. A numerical taxonomic study of the British Phaeophyta. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 763–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneath, P. H. A. & Sokal, R. R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. 573 pp. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Wishart, D. 1968. Fortran II programs for 8 methods of cluster analysis. Computer Contributions, No. 38, State Geological Survey. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Wishart, D. 1969. A Fortran II program for numerical classification. University of St Andrews, Scotland.Google Scholar