Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-03T21:20:19.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Fauna of Sand and Mud Banks Near the Mouth of the Exe Estuary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

N. A. Holme
N. A. Holme
Affiliation:
From the Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Erosion of Dawlish Warren, at the mouth of the Exe Estuary has resulted in a redistribution of sand, which has come to lie in close proximity to certain of the original mud banks.

Quantitative collections of the macrofauna were made along a traverse passing from the newly deposited sand to the old mud bank, stations all being at about half-tide level.

Measurements of salinity, temperature, pH, currents and wave action show that these are similar for all stations. Thus it has been possible to observe the distribution of the fauna in relation to the type of soil without the usual complications due to differences in other factors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , June 1949 , pp. 189 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, W. B., Southgate, B. A. & Bassindale, R. 1935. Survey of the River Tees. Part II. The Estuary—chemical and biological. D.S.I.R. Water Pollution Research, Tech. Paper No. 5. H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Allen, E. J. & Todd, R. A. 1900. The fauna of the Salcombe Estuary. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. VI, pp. 151–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, E. J. 1902. The Fauna of the Exe Estuary. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. vi, pp. 295–XS335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassindale, R., 1938. The Intertidal fauna of the Mersey Estuary. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXIII, pp. 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beanland, F. L. 1940. Sand and mud communities in the Dovey Estuary. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXIV, pp. 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, F. 1943. The distribution of the fauna of some intertidal sands and muds on the Northumberland Coast. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 12, pp. 27–41.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. R., 1928. Physical factors on the sandy beach. Part II. Chemical changes—carbon dioxide concentration and sulphides. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XV, pp 553–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, G. & Newell, G. E. 1947. The role of the body fluid in relation to movement in soft-bodied invertebrates. I. The burrowing of Arenicola. Proc. Roy. Soc. B., Vol. 134, pp 431–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Chevreux, E. & Fage, L. 1925. Amphipodes. Faune de France, Vol. IX. 488 pp. Paris.Google Scholar
Crawford, G. I., 1937 a. A review of the Amphipod genus Corophium, with notes on the British species. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXI, pp. 589–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, G. I., 1937 b. Notes on the distribution of burrowing Isopoda and Antphipoda in various soils on the sea-bottom near Plymouth. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXI, pp. 631–46.Google Scholar
Crawford, G. I., 1937 c. The Fauna of certain estuaries in West England and South Wales, with special reference to the Tanaidacea, Isopoda and Amphipoda. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXI, pp. 647–62.Google Scholar
Day, J. H. & Wilson, D. P. 1934. On the relationship of the substratum to the metamorphosis of Scolecolepis fuliginosa (Claparède). Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XIX, pp. 655–62.Google Scholar
Elmhirst, R., 1931. Studies in the Scottish Marine Fauna. The Crustacea of the Sandy and Muddy Areas of the Tidal Zone. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. LI, pp. 169–75.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P., 1923. Polychètes errantes. Faune de France, Vol. V, 488 pp. Paris.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P., 1927. Polychætes sédentaires. Faune de France, Vol. XVI. 494 pp. Paris.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E., 1931. Sur la pénétration des diverses espèces marines sessiles dans les estuaires et sa limitation par l'eau douce. Ann. Inst. Oceanogr., Tome X, fasc. 8, pp. 217–43.Google Scholar
MacGinitie, G. E., 1935. Ecological aspects of a California marine estuary. Amer. Midi. Nat., Vol. 16, pp. 629–765.Google Scholar
Malmgren, A. J., 1865. Nordiska Hafs-Annulater. K. Vet. Akad. Forhandlingar, 1865, No. 1, pp. 51–110.Google Scholar
MarineBiologicalAssociation, 1931. Plymouth Marine Fauna. (2nd ed.)Google Scholar
Milne, A., 1940. Some ecological aspects of the intertidal area of the Aberdeenshire Dee. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. LX, pp. 107–40.Google Scholar
Newell, G. E., 1948. A contribution to our knowledge of the life history of Arenicola marina L. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXVII, pp. 554–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, L., 1931. A handbook of the British Seaweeds. 478 pp. British Museum, London.Google Scholar
Örsted, A. S., 1843. Annulatorum Danicorum Conspectus. Fasc. I. Maricolae. pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Percival, E., 1929. A report on the fauna of the estuaries of the River Tamar and the River Lynher. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVI, pp. 81–108.Google Scholar
Piper, C. S., 1942. Soil and plant analysis. A Monograph from the Waite Agricultural Research Institute, 368 pp. Adelaide: University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Pirrie, M. E., Bruce, J. R. & Moore, H. B. 1932. A quantitative study of the fauna of the sandy beach at Port Erin. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVIII, pp. 279–96.Google Scholar
Rees, C. B., 1939. Notes on the ecology of the sandy beaches of North Donegal. Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., Vol. XLV, pp. 215–29.Google Scholar
Reid, D. M., 1930. Salinity interchange between sea water in sand and overflowing fresh water at low tide. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVI, pp. 609–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serventy, D. L. 1934. The Marine Invertebrate Fauna. In ‘Scolt Head Island’, edited by Steers, J. A., Cambridge, 1934, pp. 196–213.Google Scholar
Spooner, G. M. & Moore, H. B. 1940. The ecology of the Tamar Estuary. VI. An account of the macrofauna of the intertidal muds. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXIV, pp. 283–330.Google Scholar
Stephen, A. C., 1928. Notes on the biology of Tellina tenuis da Costa. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XV, pp. 683–702.Google Scholar
Stephen, A. C., 1929 a. Studies on the Scottish marine fauna: the fauna of the sandy and muddy areas of the tidal zone. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. LVI, pp. 291–306.Google Scholar
Stephen, A. C., 1929 b. Notes on the rate of growth of Tellina tenuis da Costa in the Firth of Clyde. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVI, pp. 117–29.Google Scholar
Stephen, A. C., 1931. Notes on the biology of certain lamellibranchs on the Scottish Coast. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVII, pp. 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, A. C., 1932. Notes on the biology of some lamellibranchs in the Clyde Area. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVIII, pp. 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutin, T. G., 1936. New species of Zostera from Britain. Journ. Botany, Vol. LXXIV, pp. 227–30.Google Scholar
Watkin, E. E., 1938. A revision of the Amphipod genus Bathyporeia LindstrÖm. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXIN, pp. 211–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkin, E. E., 1939. The pelagic phase in the life-history of the amphipod genus Bathyporeia. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXIII, pp. 467–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkin, E. E., 1941 a. The yearly life-cycle of the amphipod, Corophium volutator. Journ. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 10, pp. 79–93.Google Scholar
Watkin, E. E., 1941 b. Observations on the night tidal migrant Crustacea of Kames Bay. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXV, pp. 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkin, E. E., 1942. The macrofauna of the intertidal sand of Kames Bay, Millport, Buteshire. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. LX, pp. 543–61.Google Scholar
Wells, G. P., 1945. The mode of life of Arenicola marina L. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXVI, pp. 170–207.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1937. The influence of the substratum on the metamorphosis of Notomastus larvae. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXII, pp. 227–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1948. The relation of the substratum to the metamorphosis of Ophelia larvae. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXVII, pp. 723–60.Google Scholar
Worth, R. H., 1902. The Foraminifera of the Exe Estuary. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. VI, pp. 336–43.Google Scholar