Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T17:37:53.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors determining the abundance, distribution and population size–structure of the penshell Pinna carnea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2010

S. Aucoin  and
J.H. Himmelman
S. Aucoin*
Affiliation:
Département de Biologie & Québec-Océan, Université Laval, 1045 Avenue de la Médecine, Local 2078, Quebec City, Canada1V 0A6
J.H. Himmelman
Affiliation:
Département de Biologie & Québec-Océan, Université Laval, 1045 Avenue de la Médecine, Local 2078, Quebec City, Canada1V 0A6
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: S. Aucoin, Département de Biologie & Québec-Océan, Université Laval, 1045 Avenue de la Médecine, Local 2078, Quebec City, CanadaG1V 0A6 email: saucoin@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Surveys conducted in the south-western Dominican Republic showed that the penshell Pinna carnea is a consistent component of seagrass beds and is absent in adjacent sandflats. Population densities were low (0.012–0.076·m−2) and the size–structure skewed towards large individuals. Trials with different types of substrata in caged spat collectors, involving a combination of sand, seagrass blades and roots, and an artificial treatment by itself, indicated no settlement preference for any of the substrata tested. Comparison of additional spat collectors (caged and uncaged) indicated high predation losses (84%) for recently settled penshells. Experiments with penshells measuring 10–30, 50–70 and 90–110 mm (anterior to posterior dorsal tip) transplanted to plots in a seagrass bed and sandflat showed that predation losses decreased with increasing size and were much less in seagrass than in the sandflat. In 10-day trials, survival in the three size-groups was 27-fold greater in the seagrass bed than on the sandflat. During 3-day trials in the sandflat, survival increased from 6% for 50–100 mm penshells to 93% for 150–170 mm penshells. At the end of 100-day trials, during which the study area was subjected to Hurricane Dennis, the only surviving penshells were large individuals (90–110 mm) that had been transplanted to the seagrass bed. All individuals transplanted to the sandflat went missing. Growth measurements showed that small penshells grow rapidly (up to 2.2 mm·d−1), but the growth rate drops markedly at ~150 mm. Rapid juvenile growth may be a strategy for reducing the period of high vulnerability to predators. The high proportion of large individuals in the population likely represents the accumulation of successive recruitments as growth slows in older penshells. Pinna carnea is mainly restricted to seagrass beds because they provide more protection from predators than adjacent habitats. Moreover, the consolidation of sediments in seagrass beds by roots and algal rhizoids provides a degree of protection from physical disturbances such as hurricanes. The advantages provided by the seagrass habitat come at a cost because we detected a mortality factor in the seagrass bed (possibly related to the ~3-fold higher silt load) that was absent on the sandflat.

Keywords

bivalvegrowthpenshellPinna carneaPinnidaepopulation ecologypredationrecruitmentsettlementsurvival
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 91 , Issue 3 , May 2011 , pp. 593 - 606
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R.C., Wood, J.B. and Mather, J.A. (2008) Octopus vulgaris in the Caribbean is a specializing generalist. Marine Ecology Progress Series 371, 199–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arsenault, D.J. and Himmelman, J.H. (1996) Size-related changes in vulnerability to predators and spatial refuge use by juvenile Iceland scallops Chlamys islandica. Marine Ecology Progress Series 140, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aucoin, S. (2008) Écologie de population du bivalve Pinna carnea. MSc thesis. Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.Google Scholar
Aucoin, S. and Himmelman, J.H. (2010) A first report on the shrimp Pontonia sp. and other potential symbionts in the mantle cavity of the penshell Pinna carnea in the Dominican Republic. Symbiosis 50, 135–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bale, A.J. and Kenny, A.J. (2005) Sediment analysis and seabed characterization. In Eleftheriou, A. and McIntyre, A. (eds) Methods for the study of marine benthos, 3rd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 43–86.Google Scholar
Barbeau, M.A. and Scheibling, R.E. (1994) Behavioral mechanisms of prey size selection by sea stars (Asterias vulgaris Verrill) and crabs (Cancer irroratus Say) preying on juvenile sea scallops (Placopecten magellanicus Gmelin). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 182, 27–47.Google Scholar
Barbeau, M.A., Scheibling, R.E., Hatcher, B.G., Taylor, L.H. and Hennigar, A.W.J. (1994) Survival analysis of tethered juvenile sea scallops Placopecten magellanicus in field experiments: effects of predators, scallop size and density, site and season. Marine Ecology Progress Series 115, 243–256.Google Scholar
Bertness, M.D., Gaines, S.D., Stephens, E.G. and Yund, P.O. (1992) Components of recruitment in populations of the acorn barnacle Semibalanus balanoides (Linnaeus). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 156, 199–215.Google Scholar
Butler, A.J. (1987) Ecology of Pinna bicolor Gmelin (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in Gulf St. Vincent, South Australia: density, reproductive cycle, recruitment, growth and mortality at three sites. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 38, 743–769.Google Scholar
Butler, A.J. and Brewster, F.J. (1979) Size distributions and growth of the fan-shell Pinna bicolor Gmelin (Mollusca: Eulamellibranchia) in South Australia. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 30, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butman, C.A. (1987) Larval settlement of soft sediment invertebrates: the spatial scales of patterns explained by active habitat selection and the emerging role of hydrodynamical processes. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 25, 113–165.Google Scholar
Butman, C.A. (1989) Sediment-trap experiments on the importance of hydrodynamical processes in distributing settling invertebrate larvae in near-bottom waters. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 134, 37–88.Google Scholar
Castellanos, C.M., Urban, H.-J. and Borrero, F.J. (1997) Variación estacional y espacial en la fijación de postlarvas de seis especies de bivalvos (Pinctada imbricata, Pteria colymbus, Pinna carnea, Nodipecten nodosus, Argopecten nucleus y Euvola ziczac) en el Caribe Colombiano, Región Santa Marta (11′15′34″N 74′33′11″W). In VII Congresso Latino-Americano sobre Ciencias do Mar, Santos, 1997. São Paulo: Instituto Oceanográfico USP, pp. 155–156.Google Scholar
Cendejas, J.M., Carvallo, M.G. and Juarez, L.M. (1985) Experimental spat collection and early growth of the pen shell, Pinna rugosa (Pelecypoda: Pinnidae), from the Gulf of California. Aquaculture 48, 331–336.Google Scholar
Commito, J.A. (1982) Effects of Lunatia heros predation on the population dynamics of Mya arenaria and Macoma balthica in Maine, USA. Marine Biology 69, 187–193.Google Scholar
Connell, J.H. (1985) The consequences of variation in initial settlement vs. post-settlement mortality in rocky intertidal communities. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 93, 11–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constable, A.J. (1999) Ecology of benthic macro-invertebrates in soft-sediment environments: a review of progress towards quantitative models and predictions. Australian Journal of Ecology 24, 452–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craft, C.B., Seneca, E.D. and Broome, S.W. (1991) Loss on ignition and Kjeldahl digestion for estimating organic carbon and total nitrogen in estuarine marsh soils. Estuaries 14, 175–179.Google Scholar
Dietl, G.P. and Alexander, R.R. (2005) High frequency and severity of breakage-induced shell repair in western Atlantic Pinnidae (Bivalvia). Journal of Molluscan Studies 71, 307–311.Google Scholar
Eckman, J.E. (1983) Hydrodynamic processes affecting benthic recruitment. Limnology and Oceanography 28, 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggleston, D.B. and Durham, D.A. (1995) Pre- and post-settlement determinants of estuarine dungeness crab recruitment. Ecological Monographs 65, 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J., Cummings, V., Hewitt, J.Thrush, S. and Norkko, A. (2002) Determining effects of suspended sediment on condition of a suspension feeding bivalve (Atrina zelandica): results of a survey, a laboratory experiment and a field transplant experiment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 267, 147–174.Google Scholar
Gaines, S.D. and Roughgarden, J. (1985) Larval settlement: a leading determinant of structure in an ecological community of the marine intertidal zone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 82, 3707–3711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S.D. and Bertness, M.D. (1992) Dispersal of juveniles and variable recruitment in sessile marine species. Nature 360, 579–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-March, J.R., García-Carrascosa, A.M. and Peña, A.L. (2002) In situ measurement of Pinna nobilis shells for age and growth studies: a new device. Marine Ecology 23, 207–217.Google Scholar
García-March, J.R., García-Carrascosa, A.M., Peña Cantero, A.L. and Wang, Y.G. (2006) Population structure, mortality and growth of Pinna nobilis Linnaeus, 1758 (Mollusca, Bivalvia) at different depths in Moraira Bay (Alicante, western Mediterranean). Marine Biology 150, 1432–1793.Google Scholar
Garcia-Valencia, C., Urban, J.-J. and Borrero, F.J. (1997) Dinámica poblacional de la hacha Pinna carnea (Gmelin, 1791) (Bivalvia: Pinnidae) del Caribe Colombiano, Région Santa Marta (11′15′34″N 74′33′11″W). In VII Congresso Latino-Americano sobre Ciencias do Mar, Santos, 1997. São Paulo: Instituto Oceanográfico USP, p. 354.Google Scholar
Geraldes, F.X. (2003) The coral reefs of the Dominican Republic. In Cortés, J. (ed.) Latin American coral reefs. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 77–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosselin, L.A. and Qian, P.-Y. (1997) Juvenile mortality in benthic marine invertebrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series 146, 265–282.Google Scholar
Grant, J., Enright, C.T. and Griswold, A. (1990) Resuspension and growth of Ostrea edulis: a field experiment. Marine Biology 104, 51–59.Google Scholar
Green, S.B. and Salkind, N.J. (2003) Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh, analyzing and understanding data. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Harvey, M., Bourget, E. and Ingram, R.G. (1995) Experimental evidence of passive accumulation of marine bivalve larvae on filamentous epibenthic structures. Limnology and Oceanography 40, 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heck, K.L.J. and Crowder, L.B. (1991) Habitat structure and predator–prey interactions in vegetated aquatic systems. In Bell, S.S., McCoy, E.D. and Mushinsky, H.R. (eds) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 281–299.Google Scholar
Heck, K.L.J. and Orth, R.J. (1980) Seagrass habitats: the roles of habitat complexity, competition and predation in structuring associated fish and motile macroinvertebrate assemblages. In Kennedy, V.S. (ed.) Estuarine perspectives. New York: Academic Press Inc., pp. 449–464.Google Scholar
Heck, K.L.J. and Wetstone, G.S. (1977) Habitat complexity and invertebrate species richness and abundance in tropical seagrass meadows. Journal of Biogeography 4, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, H.L. and Scheibling, R.E. (1997) Role of early post-settlement mortality in recruitment of benthic marine invertebrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series 155, 269–301.Google Scholar
Idris, M.H., Arshad, A., Bujang, J.S., Daud, S.K. and Ghaffar, M.A. (2008a) New distribution record of two pen shells (Bivalvia: Pinnidae) from the seagrass beds of Sungai Pulai, Johore, Malaysia. Journal of Biological Sciences 8, 882–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idris, M.H., Arshad, A., Bujang, J.S., Ghaffar, M.A. and Daud, S.K. (2008b) Biodiversity and distribution of pen shells (Bivalvia: Pinnidae) from the seagrass beds of Sungai Pulai, Peninsular Malaysia. Research Journal of Fisheries and Hydrobiology 3, 54–62.Google Scholar
Keough, M.J. and Jones, C.M. (1982) Recruitment of marine invertebrates: the role of active larval choices and early mortality. Oecologia 54, 348–352.Google Scholar
Kingsford, M.J., Leis, J.M., Shanks, A., Lindeman, K.C., Morgan, S.G. and Pineda, J. (2002) Sensory environments, larval abilities and local self-recruitment. Bulletin of Marine Science 70, 309–340.Google Scholar
Kvitek, R.G., Oliver, J.S., DeGange, A.R. and Anderson, B.S. (1992) Changes in Alaskan soft-bottom prey communities along a gradient in sea otter predation. Ecology 73, 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenihan, H.S. and Micheli, F. (2001) Soft-sediment communities. In Bertness, M.D., Gaines, S.D. and Hay, M. (eds) Marine community ecology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, pp. 253–287.Google Scholar
Levin, L.A. (2006) Recent progress in understanding larval dispersal: new directions and digressions. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46, 282–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, H., Lin, W., Guang, Z., Cai, Z., Cai, G., Chang, Y. and Xing, K. (2006) Enhancement of larval settlement and metamorphosis through biological and chemical cues in the abalone Haliotis diversicolor supertexta. Aquaculture 258, 416–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchington, T.E. and Scheibling, R.E. (1991) The influence of larval supply and settlement on the population structure of barnacles. Ecology 72, 1967–1879.Google Scholar
Moran, M.J. (1985) Effects of prey density, prey size and predator size on rates of feeding by an intertidal predatory gastropod Morula marginalbal Blainville (Muricidae), on several species of prey. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 90, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, S.G., Zimmer-Faust, R.K., Heck, K.L.J. and Coen, L.D. (1996) Population regulation of blue crabs Callinectes sapidus in the northern Gulf of Mexico: postlarval supply. Marine Community Ecology 133, 73–88.Google Scholar
Narváez, N., Lodeiros, C., Freites, L., Nunez, M., Pico, D. and Prieto, A. (2000) Juveniles abundance and growth of Pinna carnea (Mytiloida: Pinnacea) in off-bottom culture. Revista de Biología Tropicale 48, 785–797.Google Scholar
Navarro, E., Iglesias, J.I.P. and Ortega, M.M. (1992) Natural sediment as a food source for the cockle Cerastoderma edule: effect of variable particle concentration on feeding, digestion and the scope for growth. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 156, 69–87.Google Scholar
Nelson, W.G. (1979) An analysis of structural pattern in an eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) amphipod community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 39, 231–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norkko, A., Hewitt, J.E., Thrush, S.F. and Funnell, G.A. (2001) Benthic–pelagic coupling and suspension-feeding bivalves: linking site-specific sediment flux and biodeposition to benthic community structure. Limnology and Oceanography 46, 2067–2072.Google Scholar
Núñez, P., Lodieros, C., Acosta, V. and Castillo, I. (2006) Captación de semilla de moluscos bivalves en diferentes sustratos artificiales en la Ensenada de Turpialito, Golfo de Cariaco, Venezuela. Zootecnia Tropical 24, 483–496.Google Scholar
Olafsson, E.B., Peterson, C.H. and Ambrose, W.G. (1994) Does recruitment limitation structure populations and communities of macro-invertebrates in marine soft sediments: the relative significance of pre- and post-settlement processes. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 32, 65–109.Google Scholar
Orth, R.J. (1977) The importance of sediment stability in seagrass communities. In Coull, B.C. and Belle, W. (eds) Ecology of marine benthos. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, pp. 281–300.Google Scholar
Orth, R.J., Heck, K.L. Jr and Van Montfrans, J. (1984) Faunal communities in seagrass beds: a review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics on predator–prey relationships. Estuaries 7, 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, R.T. (1976) Size-limited predation: an observational and experimental approach with the Mytilus–Pisaster interaction. Ecology 57, 93–120.Google Scholar
Pawlik, J.R. (1992) Chemical ecology of the settlement of benthic marine invertebrates. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 54, 273–335.Google Scholar
Peddicord, R.K. (1977) Salinity and substratum effects on condition index of the bivalve Rangea cuneata. Marine Biology 39, 351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, C.H. (1979) Predation, competitive exclusion, and diversity in the soft-sediment benthic communities of estuaries and lagoons. In Livingstone, R.J. (ed.) Ecological processes in coastal and marine systems. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 233–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, C.H. (1982) Clam predation by whelks (Busycon spp.): experimental tests of the importance of prey sizes, prey density, and seagrass cover. Marine Biology 66, 159–170.Google Scholar
Peterson, I. and Wroblewski, J.S. (1984) Mortality rate of fishes in the pelagic ecosystem. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41, 1117–1120.Google Scholar
Reise, K. (1976) Predation pressure and community structure. In Keegan, B.F., Ceidigh, P.O. and Broaden, P.J.S. (eds) Proceedings of the Eleventh European Symposium on Marine Biology, University College, Galway, 5–11 October 1976. Biology of Benthic Organisms. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 513–519.Google Scholar
Richardson, C.A., Kennedy, H., Duarte, C.M., Kennedy, D.P. and Proud, S.V. (1999) Age and growth of the fan mussel Pinna nobilis from south-east Spanish Mediterranean seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) meadows. Marine Biology 133, 205–212.Google Scholar
Robinson, W.E., Wehling, W.E. and Morse, M.P. (1984) The effect of suspended clay on feeding and digestive efficiency of the surf clam, Spisula solidissima. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 74, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, S.R., Ojeda, F.P. and Inestrosa, N.C. (1993) Settlement of benthic marine invertebrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series 97, 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Jaramillo, C., Maeda-Martinez, A.N., Valdez, M.E., Reynoso-Granados, T., Monsalvo-Spencer, P., Prado-Ancona, D., Cardoza-Velasco, F., Robles-Mungaray, M. and Sicard, M.T. (2001) The effect of temperature on the reproductive maturity of the penshell Atrina maura (Sowerby, 1835) (Bivalvia: Pinnidae). Journal of Shellfish Research 20, 39–47.Google Scholar
Rogers, C.S. (1990) Responses of coral reefs and reef organisms to sedimentation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 62, 185–202.Google Scholar
Rosewater, J. (1961) The family Pinnidae in the Indo-Pacific. Indo-Pacific Mollusca 1, 175–224.Google Scholar
Roughgarden, J., Gaines, S.D. and Possingham, H. (1988) Recruitment dynamics in complex life cycles. Science 241, 1460–1466.Google Scholar
Rumrill, S.S. (1990) Natural mortality of marine invertebrate larvae. Ophelia 32, 163–198.Google Scholar
Scullion Littler, D., Littler, M.M., Bucher, K.E., and Norris, J.N. (1989) Marine plants of the Caribbean, a field guide from Florida to Brazil. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 94.Google Scholar
Seed, R. (1993) Invertebrate predators and their role in structuring coastal and estuarine populations of filter feeding bivalves. In Dame, R.F. (ed.) Bivalve filter feeders in estuarine and coastal ecosystem processes. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 149–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seed, R. and Brown, R.A. (1978) Growth as a strategy for survival in two marine bivalves, Cerastodema edule and Modiolus modiolus. Journal of Animal Ecology 47, 283–292.Google Scholar
Scheibling, R.E. (1982) Feeding habits of Oreaster reticulates (Echinodermata: Asteroidea). Bulletin of Marine Science 32, 504–510.Google Scholar
Shumway, S.E., Frank, D.M., Ewart, L.M. and Ward, J.E. (2003) Effect of yellow loess on clearance rate in seven species of benthic, filter-feeding invertebrates. Aquaculture Research 34, 1391–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K.N. and Herrnkind, W.F. (1991) Predation on early juvenile spiny lobsters Panulirus argus (Latreille): influence of size and shelter. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 157, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoner, A.W. (1980) The role of seagrass biomass in the organization of benthic macrofaunal assemblages. Bulletin of Marine Science 30, 537–551.Google Scholar
Summerson, H.C. and Peterson, C.H. (1984) The role of predation in organizing benthic communities of a temperate-zone seagrass bed. Marine Ecology Progress Series 15, 63–77.Google Scholar
Tewfik, A., Rasmussen, J.B. and McCann, K.S. (2005) Anthropogenic enrichment alters a marine benthic food web. Ecology 86, 2726–2736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tewfik, A., Rasmussen, J.B. and McCann, K.S. (2007) Simplification of seagrass food webs across a gradient of nutrient enrichment. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64, 956–967.Google Scholar
Thorson, G. (1966) Some factors influencing the recruitment and establishment of marine benthic communities. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 3, 267–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, R.D. and Rosewater, J. (1958) The family Pinnidae in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia 3, 285–327.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. (1997) Analysis of variance. In Experiments in ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 140–197.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. and Denley, E.J. (1984) Paradigms, explanations, and generalizations in models for the structure of intertidal communities on rocky shores. In Strong, D.R.J., Simberloff, D., Abele, L.G. and Thistle, A.B. (eds) Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 151–181.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. and Fairweather, P.G. (1989) Supply-side ecology and benthic marine assemblages. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4, 16–20.Google Scholar
Urban, H.J. (2001) Reproductive strategies in tropical bivalves (Pteria colymbus, Pinctada imbricata and Pinna carnea): temporal coupling of gonad production and spat abundance related to environmental variability. Journal of Shellfish Research 20, 1127–1134.Google Scholar
Weerahandi, S. (1995) ANOVA under unequal error variances. Biometrics 51, 589–599.Google Scholar
Welikey, K., Suess, E., Ungerer, C.A., Muller, P.J. and Fisher, K. (1983) Problems with accurate carbon measurements in marine sediments and particulate matter in seawater: a new approach. Limnology and Oceanography 28, 1252–1259.Google Scholar
Wielderholm, A.M. (1987) Habitat selection and interactions between three marine fish species (Gobiidae). Oikos 48, 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winckworth, R. (1929) Marine Mollusca from South India and Ceylon. III. Pinna. With an index to the recent species of Pinna. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London 18, 276–297.Google Scholar
Woodin, S.A. (1991) Recruitment of infauna: positive or negative cues? American Zoology 31, 797–807.Google Scholar
Worthington, D.K., Ferrell, D.J., McNeill, S.E. and Bell, J.D. (1992) Effects of the shoot density of seagrass on fish and decapods: are correlations evident over larger spatial scales? Marine Biology 112, 139–146.Google Scholar
Wu, R.S.S. and Shin, P.K.S. (1998) Transplant experiments on growth and mortality of the fan mussel Pinna bicolor. Aquaculture 163, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C.M. (1953) Form and habit in Pinna carnea Gmelin. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 237, 335–374.Google Scholar
Young, G.A. (1983) The effect of sediment type upon the position and depth at which byssal attachment occurs in Mytilis edulis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 63, 641–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yund, P.O., Gaines, S.D. and Bertness, M.D. (1991) Cylindrical tube traps for larval sampling. Limnology and Oceanography 36, 1167–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar