Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T05:42:13.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of feeding frequency on life processes of the planktonic foraminifer Globigerinoides sacculifer in laboratory culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. W. H. Bé ,
D. A. Caron  and
O. R. Anderson
A. W. H. Bé
Affiliation:
Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory ofColumbia University, Palisades, New York, 10964
D. A. Caron
Affiliation:
Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory ofColumbia University, Palisades, New York, 10964
O. R. Anderson
Affiliation:
Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory ofColumbia University, Palisades, New York, 10964
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Globigerinoides sacculifer (Brady), a common planktonic foraminifer collected by SCUBA off Barbados, was maintained under six feeding regimes at constant light and temperature conditions. Five groups of 63 specimens each were fed 1-day-old Anemia at the rate of one nauplius per specimen every 1, 2, 3, 4 or 7 days. A starved control group received no Anemia. The rate of chamber formation and shell size increased proportional to the feeding frequency. However, an inverse correlation existed between survival time and feeding frequency. Normally, survival time ends with gametogenesis which terminates the life of the mother cell. Organisms fed more frequently reached maturity and underwent gametogenesis more rapidly than those fed less frequently. The average survival time of G. sacculifer in culture ranged from 7 days for the daily-fed group to 11 days for the group fed every 7 days. While the latter grew more slowly they eventually reached maturity. Starved individuals rarely formed chambers and often died without undergoing gametogenesis. Symbiotic zooxanthellae presumably prolonged survival of starved organisms. Extrapolation of survival data suggests G. sacculifer has a variable life span of 2 to 4 weeks depending on food availability.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , February 1981 , pp. 257 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, O. R. & Bé, A. W. H., 1976 a. The ultrastructure of a planktonic foraminifer, Globigerinoides sacculifer (Brady) and its symbiotic dinoflagellates. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 6, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, O. R. & Bé, A. W. H., 1976 b. A cytochemical fine structure study of phagotrophy in a planktonic foraminifer, Hastigerina pelagica (d'Orbigny). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 151, 437–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, O. R. & Bé, A. W. H., 1978. Recent advances in foraminiferan fine structure research. In Foraminifera, vol. 3 (ed. Hedley, R. H. and Adams, C. G.), pp. 121–202. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, O. R., Spindler, M., Be, A. W. H. & Hemleben, C., 1979. Trophic activity of plank-tonic foraminifera. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 59, 791–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balsam, W. L. & Flessa, K. W., 1978. Patterns of planktonic foraminiferal abundance and diversity in surface sediments of the western North Atlantic. Marine Micropaleontology, 3, 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Be, A. W. H., 1980. Gametogenic calcification in a spinose planktonic foraminifer, Globigerinoides sacculifer (Brady). Marine Micropaleontology, 5 (3), 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bé, A. W. H. & Anderson, O. R., 1976. Gametogenesis in planktonic foraminifera. Science, New York, 192, 890–892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bé, A. W. H., Hemleben, C., Anderson, O. R., Spindler, M., Hacunda, J. & Tuntivate-Choy, S., 1977. Laboratory and field observations of living planktonic foraminifera. Micropaleontology, 23, 155–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bé, A. W. H., Hemleben, C., Anderson, O. R. & Spindler, M., 1979. Chamber formation in planktonic foraminifera. Micropaleontology, 25, 294–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bé, A. W. H., Hemleben, C., Anderson, O. R. & Spindler, M., 1980. Pore structures in plank-tonic foraminifera. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 10, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bé, A. W. H. & Tolderlund, D. S., 1971. Distribution and ecology of living planktonic Foraminifera in surface waters of the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. In The Micropalaeontology of Oceans (ed. Funnell, B. M. and Riedel, W. R.), pp. 105–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Febvre-Chevalier, C., 1971. Constitution ultrastructurale de Globigerina bulloides d'Orbigny, 1826 (Rhizopoda-Foraminifera). Protistologica, 7, 311–324.Google Scholar
Hecht, A. D., 1974. Intraspecific variation in Recent populations of Globigerinoides ruber and Globigerinoides trilobus and their application to paleoenvironmental analysis. Journal of Paleontology, 48,1217–1234.Google Scholar
Hecht, A. D., 1976 a. An ecological model for test size variation in Recent planktonic foraminifera: applications to the fossil record. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 6, 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, A. D., 1976 b. Size variations in planktonic foraminifera: implications for quantitative paleoclimatic analysis. Science, New York, 192, 1330–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemleben, C., Be, A. W. H., Anderson, O. R. & Tuntivate, S., 1977. Test morphology, organic layers and chamber formation of the planktonic foraminifer Globorotalia menardii (d'Orbigny). Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 7,1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemleben, C., Be, A. W. H., Spindler, M. & Anderson, O. R., 1979. Dissolution effects induced by shell resorption during gametogenesis in Hastigerina pelagica (d'Orbigny). Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 9,118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketten, D. R. & Edmond, J. M., 1979. Gametogenesis and calcification of planktonic foraminifera. Nature, London, 278, 546–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. J. & Bock, W. D., 1976. The importance of feeding in two species of soritid foraminifera with algal symbionts. Bulletin of Marine Science, 26, 530–537.Google Scholar
Lee, J. J., Freudenthal, H. D., Kossoy, V. & Be, A. W. H., 1965. Cytological observations on two planktonic Foraminifera, Globigerina bulloides and Globigerinoides ruber. Journal of Protozoology, 12, 531–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Röttger, R., 1972. Die Bedeutung der Symbiose von Heterostegina depressa (Foraminifera, Nummulitidae) fur hohe Siedlungsdichte und Karbonatproduktion. Verhandlungbericht der Deutschen zoologischen Gesellschaft, 65,42–46.Google Scholar
Röttger, R. & Berger, W. H., 1972. Benthic Foraminifera: morphology and growth in clone cultures of Heterostegina depressa. Marine Biology, 15, 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spindler, M., Anderson, O. R., Hemleben, C. & Bé, A. W. H., 1978. Light-electron microscopic observations of gametogenesis in Hastigerina pelagica (Foraminifera). Journal of Protozoology, 25, 427–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spindler, M., Hemleben, C., Bayer, U., Bé, A. W. H. & Anderson, O. R., 1979. Lunar periodi-city of reproduction in the planktonic foraminifer Hastigerina pelagica. Marine Ecology—Progress Series, 1, 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiven, A. E., 1965. The relationship between size, budding rate, and growth efficiency in 3 species of Hydra. Research on Population Ecology, 7, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar