Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T07:28:35.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distribution patterns and dispersal of prosobranch gastropods along a seamount chain in the Atlantic Ocean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Josó H. Leal
Affiliation:
Marine Biology and Fisheries, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, Florida 33149, USA Present address: Departamento de Zoologià, Instituto de Biociséncias, Universidade de São Paulo, 01498 São Paulo, Brazil
Philippe Bouchet
Affiliation:
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 55 Rue Buffon, Paris 75005, France

Extract

Based on qualitative data on prosobranch gastropods present at eight seamounts and islands of the Vitória-Trindade Seamount Chain off the eastern coast of Brazil, similarities at the species level are examined, and the effects of selection for different modes of development varying with increasing distance from the coast are investigated. Number of species decreases significantly from the continent towards easternmost localities. Similarity coefficients and cluster analysis suggest that similarities are greater among the western seamounts, followed by the eastern, most oceanic localities. Subtidal stations on Trindade Island show less similarity at specific level when compared with the remaining sublittoral stations. Percentages and absolute numbers of species with intracapsular metamorphosis decrease rapidly away from the coast in the sublittoral localities. However, there is little variation for the ratio planktotrophs/lecithotrophs among these localities, and their percentages remained constant over the entire Chain. In spite of the slightly wider range of distribution of planktotrophs within the Chain, the observations suggest that both planktotrophs and lecithotrophs can be effectively dispersed, probably by passive larval transport, in an ‘island-hopping’ pattern across the relatively small distances (100–250 km) that separate summits in the Chain. Notwithstanding shallow, subtidal conditions and intense isolation, percentages of planktotrophs and lecithotrophs also do not vary at the subtidal Trindade stations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida, F.F.M. 1965. As ilhas oceânicas brasileiras e uma hipótese sobre a origem do Atlantico. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 37, 141145.Google Scholar
Asmus, H.E. 1978. Hipóteses sobre os sistemas de zonas de fraturas oceânicas/alinhamentos continentais que ocorrem nas regiões sudeste e sul do Brasil. In Aspectos Estruturais da Margem Continental Lestee Sudeste do Brasil, pp. 3973. Rio de Janeiro: Petrobras. [Série Projeto Remac 4.]Google Scholar
Bandel, K. 1975. Embryonalgehäuse karibischer Meso- und Neogastropoden (Mollusca). Abhandlung. Matematisch-Naturwissenchaftlichen Klasse. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Litemtur, Mainz, 1: 1133.Google Scholar
Bouchet, P. & Poppe, G. 1988. Deep water volutes from the New Caledonian region with a discussion on biogeography. Venus, 47, 1532.Google Scholar
Bouchet, P. & Waren, A. 1985. Revision of the northeast Atlantic bathyal and abyssal Neogastropoda excluding Turridae (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Bollettino Malacologico, supplemento 1, 121296.Google Scholar
Case, T.J. & Cody, M.L. 1987. Testing theories of island biogeography. American Scientist, 75, 402411.Google Scholar
Cordani, U.G. 1970. Idade do vulcanismo no Oceano Atlãntico Sul. Boletim do Instituto de Geociências e Astronomia da Universidade de São Paulo, 1, 976.Google Scholar
Gofas, S. & Fernandes, F. 1988. The marginellids of Sao Tomé, West Africa. Journal of Conchology, 33, 130.Google Scholar
Guazelli, W. & Carvalho, J.C. 1978. A extensío da zona de fratura de Vitória-Trindade no oceano e seu possivel prolongamento no continente. In Aspectos Estruturais da Margem Continental Leste e Sudeste do Brasil, pp. 3138. Rio de Janeiro: Petrobras. [Série Projeto Remac 4.]Google Scholar
HighsmithR.C., R.C., 1985. Floating and algal rafting as potential dispersal mechanisms in brooding invertebrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 25, 169179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonski, D. & Lutz, R.A. 1983. Larval ecology of marine benthic invertebrates. xBiological Reviews, 58, 2189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, E. A. 1967. The composition and relationships of the marine molluscan fauna of the Hawaiian Islands. Venus, 25, 94104.Google Scholar
Laursen, D. 1981. Taxonomy and distribution of teleplanic prosobranch larvae in the North Atlantic. Dana Reports, no. 89, 43 pp.Google Scholar
Macarthur, R.H. & Wilson, E.O. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, B.A. 1988. Skeneidae, Vitrinellidae and Orbitestellidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) associated with biogenic substrata from bathyal depths off New Zealand and New South Wales. Journal of Natural History, 22, 9491004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda, L.B. & CastroFilho, B.M. 1982. Geostrophic flow conditions of the Brazil Current at 19°S. Ciencia Interamericana, 22(1–2), 4448.Google Scholar
Morgan, W.J. 1983. Hotspot tracks and the early rifting of the Atlantic. Tectonophysics, 94, 123139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penchaszadeh, P. 1988. The reproductive patterns of some South American Prosobranchia as a contribution to classification. Malacological Review, supplement 4, 284287.Google Scholar
Pianka, E.R. 1966. Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. American Naturalist, 100, 3346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, E.C. 1984. The Interpretation of Ecological Data: A Primer on Classification and Ordination. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Ponder, W.F. 1970. Some aspects of the morphology of four species of the neogastropod family Marginellidae with a discussion on the evolution of the toxoglossan poison gland. Journal of the Malacological Society of Australia, 2, 5581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rex, M. & Warén, A. 1982. Planktotrophic development in deep-sea prosobranch snails from the western North Atlantic. Deep-Sea Research, 29, 171184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rios, E.C. 1985. Seashells of Brazil. Rio Grande: Museu Oceanográfico, Fundação Universidade do Rio Grande.Google Scholar
Rohlf, F.J. 1989. Ntsys-Pc. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 1·50. Stony Brook: Exeter Publishing.Google Scholar
Scheltema, R.S. 1971. Larval dispersal as a means of genetic exchange between geographically separated populations of shallow-water benthic marine gastropods. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 140, 284322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheltema, R.S. 1978. On the relationship between dispersal of pelagic veliger larvae and the evolution of marine prosobranch gastropods. In Marine Organisms: Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution (Ed. Battaglia, B. And Beardmore, J.A.), pp. 303322. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Scheltema, R.S. 1988. Initial evidence for the transport of teleplanic larvae of benthic invertebrates across the East Pacific Barrier. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 174, 145152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheltema, R.S. & Carlton, J.T. 1984. Methods of dispersal among fouling organisms and possible consequences for range extension and geographical variation. In Marine Biodeterioration: an Interdisciplinary Study (Ed. Costlow, J.D. And Tipper, R.C.), pp. 127133. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheltema, R.S. & Williams, I.P. 1983. Long-distance dispersal of planktonic larvae and the biogeography and evolution of some Polynesian and western Pacific mollusks. Bulletin of Marine Science, 33, 545565.Google Scholar
Sneath, P.H.A. & Sokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practices of Numerical Classification. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1981. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 2nd ed. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Strathmann, R.R. 1985. Feeding and nonfeeding larval development and life-history evolution in marine invertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16, 339361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorson, G. 1950. Reproductive and larval ecology of marine bottom invertebrates. Biological Reviews, 25, 145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valentine, J.W. 1966. Numerical analysis of marine molluscan ranges on the extratropical northeastern Pacific shelf. Limnology and Oceanography, 11, 198211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G.J.Kay, E.A. & Eldredge, L.G. 1984. Molluscs of the northern Mariana Islands, with special reference to the selectivity of oceanic dispersal barriers. Micronesica, 19, 2755.Google Scholar
Vink, G.E.Morgan, W.J. & Vogt, P.R. 1985. The earth's hot spots. Scientific American, 252, 5057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WilsonR.R., Jr R.R., Jr & Kauffman, S.R. 1987. Seamount biota and biogeography. In Seamounts, Islands, and Atolls (Ed. Keating, B.H.et al.), pp. 355377. Washington: American Geophysical Union. [Geophysical Monograph 43.]Google Scholar