Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:55:52.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution of Epibenthic Mollusca on a Transect Through the Beagle Channel (Southern Chile)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Katrin Linse  and
Angelika Brandt
Katrin Linse
Affiliation:
Zoological Institute and Zoological Museum, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
Angelika Brandt
Affiliation:
Zoological Institute and Zoological Museum, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the Joint Chilean–German–Italian Magellan ‘Victor Hensen’ Campaign in 1994 an epibenthic sledge (EBS) was used to catch the epibenthic and benthic-boundary-layer macrofauna.

Eighteen EBS samples were taken at 12 locations on a transect through the Beagle Channel. The aims of the study were to describe the epibenthic molluscan species, to quantify their abundances and to describe their distribution. In total 35,087 specimens were collected, yielding 107,223 ind 1000 nr−2. Bivalvia were most abundant 78,615 individuals (52 spp.) followed by Gastropoda (17,289, 52spp.), Aplacophora (4745, 9 spp.), Polyplacophora (4665) and Scaphopoda (1909,5 spp.). The molluscan abundance of the hauls were strikingly different, between 3 and 37,927 ind 1000 m−2 haul. Only stations off the eastern entrance showed high abundances, which was represented at all depths and sediments. Elsewhere the abundances were low. Species richness was highest in shallow water (< 100 m) with 69 species and decreased with depth. But at the deepest station 37 species were found.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 78 , Issue 3 , August 1998 , pp. 875 - 889
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antezana, T., Hamamé, M., Eissler, Y. & Jara, S., 1996. Hydrography in Chilean fjords: Strait of Magellan to Beagle Channel (legs 1 and 2). Berichte zur Polarforschung, 190, 16–18.Google Scholar
Arntz, W. & Gorny, M., 1996. Cruise report of the Joint Chilean–German–Italian Magellan ‘Victor Hensen’ Campaign in 1994. Berichte zur Polarforschung, 190, 11–13.Google Scholar
Bastida, R., Roux, A. & Martinez, D.E., 1992. Benthic communities of the Argentine continental shelf. Oceanologica Acta, 15, 687–698.Google Scholar
Brambati, A., 1992. Introduction to the Magellan Project. Bolletino di Oceanologia Teoretica ed Applicata, IX, 2/3, 83–92.Google Scholar
Brambati, A., Fontolan, G. & Simeoni, U., 1992a. Recent sediments and sedimentological processes in the Strait of Magellan. Bolletino di Oceanologia Teoretica ed Applicata, IX, 2/3, 217–259.Google Scholar
Brambati, A., Fontolan, G. & Simeoni, U., 1992b. Carta sedimentologia dello Stretto di Magellan. Bolletino di Oceanologia Teoretica ed Applicata, IX, 2/3.Google Scholar
Brandt, A. & Barthel, D., 1995. An improved supra- and epibenthic sledge for catching Peracarida (Crustacea, Malacostraca). Ophelia, 43, 15–23.Google Scholar
Brandt, A., Linse, K. & Weber, U., 1997. Abundance and diversity of peracarid taxa (Crustacea, Malacostraca) along a transect through the Beagle Channel, Patagonia. Polar Biology, 18, 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brattegard, T. & Fosså, J.H., 1991. Replicability of an epibenthic sampler. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 71, 153–166.Google Scholar
Cabrini, M. & Fonda, Umani S., 1992. Phytoplankton populations in the Strait of Magellan. Bolletino di Oceanologia Teoretica ed Applicata, IX, 2/3, 137–144.Google Scholar
Castellanos, Z.J.A. De, 1988–1993. Catalogo descriptivo de la malacofauna magallanica. Parts 1–12. Report. Comisión de lnvestigaciones Cientificas, Provincia de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Celio, M., 1992. Preliminary report on thermohaline features of Canales Beagle, Ballenero, Brecknock, Cockburn and Magdalena (Southern hemisphere), autumn 1991. Bolletino di Oceanologia Teoretica ed Applicata, IX, 2/3, 281–286.Google Scholar
Colizza, E., 1992. Preliminary report on coastal morphology and sea-bottom sediments of the Canales Beagle, Ballenero, Brecknock, Cockburn, and Magdalena. Bolletino di Oceanologia Teoretica ed Applicata, IX, 2/3, 273–279.Google Scholar
Dall, W.H., 1890. Scientific results of exploration by the U.S. Fish Commission steamer ‘Albatross’, VII. Preliminary report on the collection of Mollusca and Brachiopoda obtained in 1887–1888. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 12, 219–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall, W.H., 1908. The Mollusca and the Brachiopoda. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 43, 205–487.Google Scholar
Dell, R.K., 1964. Antarctic and sub-Antarctic Mollusca: Amphineura, Scaphopoda, and Bivalvia. Discovery Reports, 23, 93–250.Google Scholar
Gutt, J. & Schickan, T., 1996. Epibenthic communities analysed by underwater camera. Berichte zur Polarforschung, 190, 35–41.Google Scholar
Hain, S., 1990. Die beschalten Mollusken (Gastropoda und Bivalvia) des Weddellmeeres, Antarktis. Berichte zur Polarforschung, 70, 11–81.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, S.H., 1971. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology, 52, 577–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, P.P. & Broderip, W.J., 1831. Description of the Cirrhipedia, Conchifera and Mollusca formed by the officers of H.M.S. Adventure and Beagle employed between the years 1826 and 1830 in surveying the southern coasts of South America including the Straits of Magelhaens and the coast of Tierra del Fuego. The Zoological journal, 5, 332–349.Google Scholar
Klöser, H., 1996. Hydrography of the Beagle Channel (leg 4). Berichte zur Polarforschung, 190, 18–19.Google Scholar
Leloup, E., 1956. Polyplacophora. Lunds Universitets Arsskrift, 52, 1–94.Google Scholar
Linse, K., 1996. Die Verbreitung epibenthischer Mollusken im chilenischen Beagle-Kanal. PhD thesis, University of Kiel, Germany.Google Scholar
Linse, K., 1997. Die Verbreitung epibenthischer Mollusken im chilenischen Beagle-Kanal. Berichte zur Polarforschung, 228, 11–31.Google Scholar
Lloris, D. & Rucabado, J., 1991. Ictiofauna del Canal Beagle (Tierra del Fuego), aspectos egológios y análisis biogeográfico. Publicaciones Especiales Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Madrid, 8, 11–82.Google Scholar
Mabille, J. & Rochebrune, A.T., 1889. Mollusques. Mission Scientifique du Cap Horn, 1882–1883. Zoologie, 6(2), 1–143.Google Scholar
Marcus, E., 1959. Lamellariacea and Opisthobranchia. Lunds Universitets Arsskrift, 55, 11–35.Google Scholar
Melvill, J.C. & Standen, R., 1907. The marine Mollusca of the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 46, 119–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melvill, J.C. & Standen, R., 1912. The marine Mollusca of the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition. Part II. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 46, 333–366.Google Scholar
Mühlenhardt-Siegel, U., 1989. Quantitative investigations of Antarctic zoobenthos communities in winter (May/June) 1986 with special reference to the sediment structure. Archiv für Fischereiwissenschaften, 39, 123–141.Google Scholar
Panella, S., Michelato, A., Perdicaro, R., Magazzù, G., Decembrini, F. & Scarazzato, P., 1992. A preliminary contribution to understanding the hydrological characteristics of the Strait of Magellan: austral spring 1989. Bolletino di Oceanologia Teoretica ed Applicata, IX, 2/3, 107–126.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1903. Mollusques (Amphineures, Gasteropodes et Lamellibranches). Résultat du Voyage du S.Y. ‘Belgica’ en 1897–1898–1899. Rapports Scientifiques Zoologie, 1–85.Google Scholar
Pielou, E.C., 1966. The measurement of species diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, A.W.B., 1951. Antarctic and sub-Antarctic Mollusca: Pelecypoda and Gastropoda. Discovery Reports, 26, 49–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothlisberg, P.C. & Pearcy, W.G., 1977. An epibenthic sampler used to study the ontogeny of vertical migration of Pandalus jordani (Decapoda, Caridea). Fishery Bulletin. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Washington, DC, 74, 994–997.Google Scholar
Shannon, C.E. & Weaver, W., 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A.E., 1881. Mollusca and Molluscoidea. Account of the Zoological collections made during the survey of HMS ‘Alert’ in the Straits of Magellan and on the coast of Patagonia. Proceedings of Zoological Society of London, 1881, 22–44.Google Scholar
Smith, A.E., 1885. Report on the Lamellibranchiata collected by H.M.S. ‘Challenger’, during the years 1873–1976. Report of the Scientific Results of the Voyage of HMS ‘Challenger,’ 1873–1876. Zoology, 13, 13–41.Google Scholar
Soot-Ryen, T., 1959. Pelecypoda. Lunds Universitets Arsskrift, 55, 1–86.Google Scholar
Strebel, H., 1904. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Mollusken Fauna der Magalhaen Provinz. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere, Jena, 21, 171–248.Google Scholar
Strebel, H., 1905a. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Mollusken Fauna der Magalhaen Provinz. II. Die Trochiden. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere, Jena, 21, Supplementband VIII, 121–166.Google Scholar
Strebel, H., 1905b. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Mollusken Fauna der Magalhaen Provinz. 3. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere, Jena, 22, 575–666.Google Scholar
Strebel, H., 1906. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Mollusken Fauna der Magalhaen Provinz. 4. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere, Jena, 24, 91–174.Google Scholar
Strebel, H., 1907. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Mollusken Fauna der Magalhaen Provinz. 5. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere, Jena, 25, 79–196.Google Scholar
Strebel, H., 1908. Die Gastropoden. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition (1901–1903), 6, 11–12.Google Scholar
Uribe, J.C., 1988. Observaciones sobre algunos fenomenos recurrentes en el fitoplancton de Seno Union y Bahia Bell (region de Magellanes) y su relacion con la estabilidad de la columna de aqua. Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia Serie Ciencias Naturales, Chile, 18, 103–111.Google Scholar
Witte, U., 1996. Sponge biology and sediment biochemistry. Berichte zur Polarforschung, 190, 35.Google Scholar