Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T19:48:54.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The density of the eggs of Calanus finmarchicus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

E. A. Salzen
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Edinburgh, and Marine Station, Millport

Extract

The vertical distribution of plankton organisms and their eggs depends largely on their surface area and density (Eyden, 1923). Gross & Raymont (1942) observed that the eggs of Calanus finmarchicus had a density (1.045–1.049 g/cc) greater than that of sea water (1.0235–1.025 g/cc), and that they sank at the rate of approximately 2.5 cm/min at 13°C. These workers pointed out that since the embryo takes 24 h to complete development, the eggs will sink in still water to a depth of 36 m before hatching and yet the data available, although not extensive, suggests that both eggs and nauplii are found most abundantly nearer the surface than this (Nicholls, 1933; Kraefft, 1910). If these observations are correct, then in addition to density and viscosity, there must be a third factor affecting the distribution of these eggs. Unfortunately, Gross & Raymont did not consider the possible effect of viscosity in their method for determining density, and they themselves commented on the disturbing degree of variation in some of their results. Their measurements of the rate of sinking of the eggs in sea water also showed considerable variation. It seemed worth while, therefore, to measure the density of these eggs using the density gradient technique of Linderstrøm-Lang (1937), a method which enables the individual and precise measurement of the density of small living objects, independent of their shape, i.e. surface area. This method was being used in work on Psammechinus eggs at the Marine Station, Millport, and, at the suggestion of Dr A. P. Orr, the following measurements were made on the eggs of Calanus finmarchicus.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eyden, D., 1923. Specific gravity as a factor in the vertical distribution of plankton. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. (biol. Sci.), Vol. 1, pp. 4955.Google Scholar
Gross, F. & Raymont, J. E. G., 1942. The specific gravity of Calarms finmarchicus. Proc. roy. Soc. Edinb., B, Vol. 61, No. 21, pp. 288–96.Google Scholar
Knudsen, M., 1901. Hydrographical Tables. 63 pp. Copenhagen: G. E. C. Gad.Google Scholar
Kraefft, F., 1910. Über das Plankton in Ost- und Nordsee und den Verbindungsgebieten, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Copepoden. Wiss. Meeresunters. (Abt. Kiel), N.F., Bd. 11, pp. 29108.Google Scholar
Linderstrøm-Lang, K., 1937. Dilatometric ultra-micro-estimation of peptidase activity. Nature, Lond., Vol. 139, pp. 713–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderstrøm-Lang, K., Jacobson, O. & Johansen, G., 1938. On The Measurement Of Deuterium Content In Mixtures Of H2O And D2O. C.R. Lab. Carlsberg (Sér. chim.), Vol. 23, pp. 1726.Google Scholar
Linderstrøm-Lang, K. & Lanz, H., 1938. Studies on enzymatic histochemistry. XXIX. Dilatometric micro-estimation of peptidase activity. C.R. Lab. Carlsberg (Sér. chim.), Vol. 21, pp. 315–38.Google Scholar
Løvtrup, S., 1950. Determination of density of amoebae by means of a starch density gradient. C.R. Lab. Carlsberg (Sér. chim.), Vol. 27, pp. 137–44.Google Scholar
Marshall, S. M. & Orr, A. P., 1952. On the biology of Calanus finmarchicus. VII. Factors affecting the egg production. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 30, pp. 527–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D. J., 1932. Tables of the Determination of Density of Sea Water under Normal Pressure, Sigma-t. 59 pp. Copenhagen: Conseil Perm. Int. Explor. Mer.Google Scholar
Nicholls, A. G., 1933. On the biology of Calanus finmarchicus. III. Vertical distribution and diurnal migration in the Clyde sea area. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 19, pp. 139–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sverdrup, H. U., Johnson, M. W. & Fleming, R. H., 1942. The Oceans. 1087 pp. New York.Google Scholar