Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:17:44.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative osteology of the axial skeleton of the genus Pampus (Family: Stromateidae, Perciformes)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2016

Laith A. Jawad  and
Liu Jig
Laith A. Jawad*
Affiliation:
Flat Bush, Manukau, Auckland, New Zealand
Liu Jig
Affiliation:
Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 7 Nanhai Road, Qingdao 266071, P. R. China
*
Correspondence should be addressed to:L.A. Jawad Flat Bush, Manukau, Auckland, New Zealand Email: laith_jawad@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seven osteological characters of the axial skeleton are studied in the eight species of the genus Pampus. The characters include: pattern of interdigitation of the dorsal- and anal-fin pterygiophores with the neural and haemal spines of the vertebrae, structure of the vertebral column, distribution of the dorsal- and ventral- procurrent caudal-fin rays, distribution of the principal caudal-fin rays and the morphology of the caudal-fin skeleton. All these features appear to be useful in the characterization of the eight species of the genus Pampus. Formulae for the structure of the vertebral column, the dorsal- and anal-fin pterygiophores’ interdigitation with the neural and haemal spines of the vertebrae, distribution of the dorsal and ventral procurrent caudal-fin rays, and distribution of the principal caudal-fin rays were developed. Pampus nozawae was recently considered a synonym of P. argenteus. However, according to the characters used in the present study, this species is notably distinct from P. argenteus.

Keywords

Vertebral columnpterygiophoresdorsal finanal fininterdigitationcaudal fin formula
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 97 , Issue 2 , March 2017 , pp. 277 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abe, T. and Takashima, Y. (1953) New, rare or uncommon fishes from Japanese waters. II. Records of rare fishes of the families Diretmidae, Luvaridae, and Tetragonuridae, with an appendix (Description of a new species, Tetragonurus pacificus, from off the Solomon Islands). Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 3, 39–47.Google Scholar
Ahlstrom, E.H., Butler, J.L. and Sumida, B.Y. (1976) Pelagic stromateoid fishes (Pisces, Perciformes) of the eastern Pacific: kinds, distributions, and early life histories and observations on five of these from the northwest Atlantic. Bulletin of Marine Science 26, 285–402.Google Scholar
Basilewsky, S. (1855) Ichthyographia Chinae borealis. Nouveaux mémoires de la Société impériale des naturalistes de Moscou v. 10, 215–263, Pls. 1–9.Google Scholar
Birdsong, R.S. (1975) The osteology of Microgobius signatus Poey (Pisces: Gobiidae), with comments on other gobiid fishes. Bulletin of Florida State Museum of Biological Science 19, 135–187.Google Scholar
Birdsong, R.S., Murdy, E.O. and Pezold, F.L. (1988) A study of the vertebral column and median fin osteology in gobiid fishes with comments on gobiid relationships. Bulletin of Marine Science 42, 174–214.Google Scholar
Bloch, M.E. (1795) Naturgeschichte der Austländischen Fische, Neunter Theil. Berlin: J. Morino & Company, 192 pp.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, C.L. (1834) Iconografi a della fauna italica, per le quattro classi degli animali vertebrati. Tome III, part 2. Roma: Pesces, p. 90.Google Scholar
Cheng, Q.T. (1962) Stromateidae, the fishes of South China Sea. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Cui, Z., Liu, Y., Li, C.P. and Chu, K.H. (2011) Species delineation in Pampus (Perciformes) and the phylogenetic status of the Stromateoidei based on mitogenomics. Molecular Biology Reports 38, 1103–1114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, F. (1876) The fishes of India; being a natural history of the fishes known to inhabit the seas and freshwater of India, Burma, and Ceylon, Volume 1. London, pp. 246–247.Google Scholar
Day, J.J. (2002) Phylogenetic relationships of the Sparidae (Teleostei: Percoidei) and implications for convergent trophic evolution. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 67, 269–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, S.M., Xiong, C.Q. and Zhan, H.X. (1981) A comparative study of the lateral line canal system of Chinese Stromateidae. Acta Zoologica Sinica 27, 232–239. [In Chinese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Dolganov, V.N., Kharin, V.E. and Zemnukhov, V.V. (2007) Species composition and distribution of butterfishes (Stromateidae) in waters of Russia. Journal of Ichthyology 47, 579–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doiuchi, R., Sato, T. and Nakabo, T. (2004) Phylogenetic relationships of the stromateoid fishes (Perciformes). Ichthyological Research 51, 202–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eschmeyer, W.N. (ed.) (2015) Catalog of fishes. http://research.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp (last accessed 20 August 2015).Google Scholar
Euphrasen, B.A. (1788a) Beschreibung dreyer Fische. Der Königlich Schwedischen Akademie der Wissenschaften neue Abhandlungen aus der Naturlehre, Haushaltungskunst und Mechanik. N. S. 9, 51–55.Google Scholar
Euphrasen, B.A. (1788b). Beskrifning på trenne fiskar. Vetensk. Akad. Nya Handl. Stockholm 7, 64–67.Google Scholar
Fowler, H.W. (1972) A synopsis of the fishes of China, Volume 1. Amsterdam: Antiquariat Junk, pp. 296–305.Google Scholar
Fricke, R. (1983) A method for counting caudal fin rays of actinopterygian fishes. Braunschweiger Naturkundliche Schriften 1, 729–733.Google Scholar
Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (2015) Fishbase. World Wide Web Electronic Publication. Available from: www.fishbase.org. (accessed 20 August 2015).Google Scholar
Fujita, K. (1990) The caudal skeleton of teleostean fishes (in Japanese). Tokyo: Tokai University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, A.C. and Edwards, A.J. (2004) Revision of the Indian Ocean dottyback fish genera Chilidichthys and Pectinochromis (Perciformes: Pseudochromidae: Pseudoplesiopinnae). Smithiana, Publications in Aquatic Biodiversity Bulletin 3, 1–46.Google Scholar
Haedrich, R.L. (1967) The stromateoid fishes: systematics and a classification. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 135, 31–139.Google Scholar
Hollister, G. (1941) Caudal skeleton of Bermuda shallow water fishes. V. Order Percomorphi: Carangidae. Zoologica. Scientific Contributions of the New York Zoological Society 26, 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, M.H. (1984) Stromateoidei: development and relationships. In Moser, H.G., Richards, W.J., Cohen, D.M., Fahay, M.P., Kendall, A.W. Jr. and Richardson, S.L. (eds) Ontogeny and systematics of fishes. Special publication 1. Lawrence, KS: American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, pp. 620–628.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, C. (1904) Notes on some new or little known fish from Japan. Proceedings of Department of Natural History, Tokyo Imperial Museum 1, 8–9.Google Scholar
Johnson, G.D. (1975) The procurrent spur: an undescribed perciform caudal character and its phylogenetic implications. Occasional Publications of California Academy of Science 121, 1–23.Google Scholar
Last, P.R. (2001) Stromateidae. In Carpenter, K.E. and Niem, V.H. (eds) The living marine resources of the western central Pacific, FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes, Volume 6, part 4. Rome: FAO, pp. 3786–3791.Google Scholar
Lindberg, G.U. and Krasyukova, Z.V. (1975) Fishes of the Sea of Japan and the adjacent areas of the Sea of Okhotsk and Yellow Sea. Part 4. Leningrad: Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 332 pp.Google Scholar
Liu, J. (2008) Vertebrata. In Liu, J.Y. (ed.) Checklist of marine biota of China Seas. Beijing: Science Press. [In Chinese]Google Scholar
Liu, J. and Li, C.S. (1998a) A new pomfret species, Pampus minor sp. nov. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 16, 280–285.Google Scholar
Liu, J. and Li, C.S. (1998b) Redescription of a stromateoid fish, Pampus punctatissimus (Temminck and Schlegel, 1845) and comparison with Pampus argenteus (Euphrasen, 1788). China Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 16, 161–166.Google Scholar
Liu, J. and Li, C.S. (2013) A new species of the genus Pampus (Perciformes, Stromateidae) from China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 38, 885–890.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Li, C. and Li, X. (2002a) Phylogenetic and biogeography of Chinese pomfret fish (Pisces: Stromateidae). Studia Marina Sinica 44, 235–239.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Li, C. and Li, X. (2002b) Studies on Chinese pomfret fishes of the genus Pampus (Pisces: Stromateidae). Studia Marina Sinica 44, 240–252.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Li, C.S., Li, X.S. and Ning, P. (2013a) Identity of silver pomfret Pampus argenteus (Euphrasen, 1788) based on specimens from its type locality, with a neotype designation (Teleostei: Stromateidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 38, 171–177.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Li, C. and Ning, P. (2013b) A redescription of grey pomfret Pampus cinereus (Bloch, 1795) with the designation of a neotype (Teleostei: Stromateidae). Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 31, 140–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakabo, T. (2000) Fishes of Japan with pictorial keys to the species. Tokyo: Yikai University Press, p. 1338.Google Scholar
Nakabo, T. (2002) Ariommatidae. In Nakabo, T. (ed.) Fishes of Japan with pictorial keys to the species, English edition. Tokyo: Tokai University Press, pp. 966, 1572.Google Scholar
Naseka, A.M. (1996) Comparative study on the vertebral column in the Gobioninae (Cyprinidae, Pisces) with special reference to its systematics. Publicaciones Especiales Instituto Español de Oceanografía 2, 149–167.Google Scholar
Parin, N. and Piotrovsky, A.S. (2004) Stromateoid fishes (Suborder: Stromateoidei) of the Indian Ocean (species composition, distribution, biology, and fisheries). Journal of Ichthyology 44(Suppl. 1), 33–62.Google Scholar
Rosen, D.E. (1973) Inter-relationships of fishes: interrelationships of higher Euteleostean fishes. London: Linnaean Society, pp. 397–513.Google Scholar
Rosen, D.E. and Patterson, C. (1969) The structure and relationships of the paracanthopterygian fishes. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 141, 357–464.Google Scholar
Shao, K.T. (2015) Taiwan Fish Database. World Wide Web electronic publication. Available from www.fishdb.sinica.edu.tw. (accessed on 20 August 2015).Google Scholar
Springer, V.G. and Gomon, M.F. (1975) Variation in the western Atlantic clinid fish Malacoctenus triangulatus with a revised key to the Atlantic species of Malacoctenus . Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 200, 1–11.Google Scholar
Springer, V.G. and Smith-Vaniz, W.F. (2008) Supraneural and pterygiophore insertion patterns in carangid fishes, with description of a new Eocene carangid tribe, Paratrachinotini, and a survey of anterior anal-fin pterygiophore insertion patterns in Acanthomorph. Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington 16, 1–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temminck, C.J. and Schlegel, H. (1845) Pisces. In Fauna Japonica, sive descriptio animalium quae in itinere per Japoniam suscepto annis 1823–30 collegit, notis observationibus et adumbrationibus illustravit P. F. de Siebold. Part 1, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Tyler, J.C., O'Tool, B. and Winterbottom, R. (2003) Phylogeny of the genera and families of zeiform fishes, with comments on their relationships with tetraodontiforms and caproids. Smithsonian Contribution to Zoology 618, 1–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, H.L. (1985) Stromateidae. In Chu, Y.T. (ed.) The fishes of Fujian Province (Part II). Fuzhou: Fujian Science and Technology Press, pp. 431–433 [In Chinese]Google Scholar
Wu, H.L., Shao, K.T. and Lai, C.F. (1999) Latin-Chinese dictionary of fish's names. Taiwan, Keeloon: The Sueichan Press, pp. 661.Google Scholar
Wu, R., Li, C. and Liu, J. (2013) Mitochondrial 16S rRNA sequence variation and molecular phylogenetic relationship of Stromateidae (Teleostei: Perciformes). Journal of Fisheries of China 37, 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar