No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Breeding of Arenicola Ecaudata Johnston and A. Branchialis Aud. & Edw. at Plymouth
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 May 2009
Extract
The two ‘tail-less’ lugworms, Arenicola ecaudata Johnston and A.branchialis Audouin and Mime-Edwards (= A.grubii Claparede), live in gravel and under stones, unlike the 'tailed' species which are found mainly in sandy beaches. Both are local in distribution compared with the wide-spread caudate species. A. ecaudata is known to occur from Iceland to northern Spain, and thus has a rather more boreal distribution than A. branchialis which ranges from the west coast of Scotland to Morocco, the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. (Ashworth, 1912; Mclntosh, 1915; Fauvel, 1927; Rioja, 1935; WesenbergLundj 1951.) Neither species is known from the western side of the Atlantic.
Since the two species can often occur side by side and it appeared that they were adapted, not for life in different habitats, but for different temperature regimes, it was suggested to us by Prof. G. P. Wells, F.R.S., that an investigation of their breeding seasons at Plymouth might help in understanding their distribution and specific separation. It happened that we had already made some preliminary investigations in the Isle of Man, and we were therefore pleased to adopt Prof. Wells's suggestion.
Mature specimens of both species have been noted by previous workers. Ashworth (1912) found mature gametes in A. ecaudata at Port Erin in April and at Plymouth in August. Fauvel (1899) recorded mature worms at Cherbourg from March to October, while Hentschel (1930) believed spawning occurred at Plymouth in February-March and August-September.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , June 1958 , pp. 268 - 285
- Copyright
- Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1958
References
REFERENCES
Ashworth, J. H. 1912. Catalogue of the Chaetopoda in the British Museum. A. Polychaeta: Part I — Arenicolidae. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Bhatti, H. K. & Soofi, M. 1949. Arenicola —a polychaete from Karachi. Pakist. J. Sci., Vol. I, pp. 76–7.Google Scholar
Bianco, S. Lo 1909. Notizie biologiche riguardanti specialmente il periodo di maturita sessuale degli animali del golfo di Napoli. Mitt. zool. Sta. Neapel, Bd. 19, pp.513–761.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. R. 1928. Physical factors on the sandy beach. Part II. Chemical changes─ carbon dioxide concentration and sulphides. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 15, PP. 553–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Southward, A. J. 1958. The distribution ofintertidal organisms along the coasts of the English Channel. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 37, pp. 157–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuenot, L. 1891. Infusoires commensaux des Ligies, Patelles et Arenicoles. Rev. biol. N. France, T. 4, pp. 81–9.Google Scholar
Cunningham, J. J. 1907. On Kalpidorhynchus arenicolae, a new gregarine, parasitic in Arenicola ecaudata. Arch. Protistenk., Bd. 10, pp. 199–215.Google Scholar
Downing, E. R. 1909. The connections of the gonadial blood vessels and the form of the nephridia in the Arenicolidae. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole, Vol. 16, pp. 246–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, E. R. 1911. The formation of the spermatophore in Arenicola and a theory of the alternation of generations in animals. J. Morph., Vol. 22, pp. 1001–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, N. 1950. Spawning of Arenicola marina L. in captivity. Rep. mar. biol. Sta.Pt Erin, No. 62, pp. 27–9.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P. 1899. Observations sur VArenicola ecaudata Johnston. Bull. Soc. Linn. Normandie, Ser. 5, Vol. 2, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Goodrich, E. S.Pixell-Goodrich, H. 1920. Gonospora minchini n.sp., a gregarine inhabiting the egg of Arenicola. Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 65, pp. 157–62.Google Scholar
Guberlet, J. E. 1934. Observations on the spawning and development of some Pacific annelids. Proc. Pacif. Sci. Congr., Vol. 5, pp. 4213–20.Google Scholar
Hentschel, C. C., 1930. On the correlation of the life-history of the acephaline gregarine, Gonospora, with the sexual cycle of its host. II.Gonospora (Kalpidorhynchus) arenicolae. Parasitology, Vol. 22, pp. 505–9.Google Scholar
Lillie, R. S., 1905. The structure and development of the nephridia of Arenicola cristata Stimpson. Mitt. zool. Sta. Neapel, Bd. 17, pp. 341–405.Google Scholar
Mcintosh, W. C. 1915. A Monograph on the British Marine Annelids, Vol. 3, 368 pp. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Newell, G. E. 1948. A contribution to our knowledge of the life history of Arenicola marina L. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 27, pp. 554–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okuda, S., 1938. Notes on the spawning habit of Arenicola claparedii Levinsen. Annot. zool. jap., Vol. 17, pp. 577–80.Google Scholar
Orton, J. H. 1920. Sea-temperature, breeding and distribution or marine animals. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 12, pp. 339–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qasim, S. Z. 1956. Time and duration of the spawning season in some marine teleosts in relation to their distribution. J. Cons. int.Explor. Mer, Vol. 21, pp. 144–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rioja, E. 1935. Annelidos poliquetos procendentes de la campafias del Instituto Espanol de Oceanografio. Trab. Inst. esp. Oceanogr., No. 13, 44 pp.Google Scholar
Southern, R. 1914. Archiannelida and Polychaeta. Clare Island Survey. Proc. R. Irish Acad., Vol. 31, Sect. 2, Pt.47,160 pp.Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. 1938. On some castings of sand in Korror Island of the Palao group. Palao trop. biol. Stud., Vol. 1, pp. 459–68.Google Scholar
Thorson, G. 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates, with special reference to the planktonic larvae in the Sound (Øresund). Medd. Komm. Havunderseg., Kbh., Ser. Plankt., Bd. 4, No. 1, 523 pp.Google Scholar
Wells, G. P. 1952. The proboscis apparatus of Arenicola. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 31, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, G. P. 1954 The mechanism of proboscis movement in Arenicola. Quart. J. micr. Set., Vol. 95, pp. 251–70.Google Scholar