Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T17:15:41.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The biology of Cucumaria elongata (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

John D. Fish
John D. Fish*
Affiliation:
Dove Marine Laboratory, University of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne
*
*Present address: Department of Zoology, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, Wales.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A population of Cucumaria elongata (Düb & Kor.), found in muddy sand off the Northumberland coast, has been sampled from 1961 to 1964. Densities of more than 20 per m were common.

Cucumaria is a suspension feeder, and uses its tentacles to trap suspended paniculate matter. In the absence of mucous glands or cilia on the tentacles, suspended matter is held fast in a covering of mucus which is produced by glands in the pharynx and oesophagus. Each time the tentacles are introduced into the pharangeal lumen in the course of feeding, they pick up a fresh complement of mucus.

The feeding behaviour is seasonal. During the early part of October the animals stop feeding, and remain dormant until late April/early May of the following year.

The results of monthly experiments to determine the oxygen consumption, percentage of total lipid and the volume/dry-weight ratio, have led to the conclusion that during the winter months Cucumaria hibernates.

The effect of temperature on the feeding behaviour is discussed.

Regular quantitative sampling has shown that Cucumaria is slow growing, and over the area surveyed, four different age-groups were found. These have been designated groups I, A, B and C. Group I was estimated to be 2 years old; group A, 6 six years; group B, 8 years; and group C, 10 years old.

Although active sperm and apparently mature eggs were found in specimens collected as far back as 1962, there is no evidence to suggest that any of the age-groups has reproduced.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , February 1967 , pp. 129 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, R. H., 1959. A preliminary account of a new half square metre bottom sampler(Title only). Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 146, p. 48.Google Scholar
Baker, J. R., 1946. The histochemical recognition of lipine. Q. Jl microsc. Set., Vol. 87, pp. 441–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Brattström, H., 1941. Studien über die Echinodermen des Gebietes zwischen Skagerrak und Ostsee, besonders des öresundes, mit einer Übersicht über die physische Geographie. Undersōkn. Öresund, No. 27, 329 pp. Lund.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. B., 1963. The bottom fauna communities and their sediment relationships off the coast of Northumberland. Oikos, Vol. 14, pp. 154–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, L., Giese, A. C., Farmanfarmaian, A. & Boolootian, R. A., 1958. Cyclic biochemical changes in several echinoderms. J. exp. Zool., Vol. 139, pp. 507–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, I. D., 1962. Observations on a highly specific method for the histochemical detection of sulphated mucopolysaccharides, and its possible mechanisms. Q. Jl microsc. Sci., Vol. 103, pp. 457–75.Google Scholar
Hunt, O. D., 1925. The food of the bottom fauna of the Plymouth fishing grounds. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 13, pp. 560–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehler, R., 1921. Échinodermes. Faune Fr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krumbein, W. C. & Pettijohn, F. J., 1938. Manual of Sedimentary Petrography. New York: Appleton-Gentury Crofts. 549 pp.Google Scholar
Mitsukuri, K., 1903. Notes on the habits and life history of Stichopus japonicus. Annotnes zool. jap., Vol. 5, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Mortensen, T., 1927. Handbook of the Echinoderms of the British Isles. 471 pp. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohshima, H., 1925. Notes on the development of the sea cucumber Thy one briareus. Science, N.Y., Vol. 61, pp. 420–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, J. H., 1914. On some Plymouth holothurians. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 10, pp. 211–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearse, A. S., 1908. Observations on the behaviour of the holothurian, Thyone briareus. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 15, pp. 259–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sang, C., 1962. Biology of the Japanese common sea cucumber, Stichopus japonicus Selenka. 226 pp. Pusan, Korea. (In Korean, with English summary.)Google Scholar
Semper, C., 1868. Holothurien. In Reisen in Archipel der Philippines Zw. Theil., Wiss. Result, Bd 1. 288 pp.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y., 1958. Feeding and digestive processes of Stichopus japonicus. Bull. Fac. Fish. Hokkaido Univ., Vol. 9, pp. 14–28.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates, with special reference to the planktonic larvae in the Sound (Øresund). Meddr Kommn Havunder., Ser. Plankton, Bd. 4, No. 1, 523 pp.Google Scholar
Ursin, E., 1960. A quantitative investigation of the echinoderm fauna of the central North Sea. Meddr Kommn Havunder., N.S., Bd. 2, No. 24, 204 pp.Google Scholar
Vatova, A., 1949. La fauna bentonica dell’ Alto e Medio Adriatico. Nova Thalassia, Vol. 1, No. 3, 110 pp.Google Scholar
Whitney, R. J., 1938. A syringe pipette method for the determination of oxygen in the field. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 15, pp, 564–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar