Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T03:06:20.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biochemical Studies on Marine Zooplankton X.The Amino Acid Composition of Euphausia Superb a, Meganyctiphanes Norvegicaand Neomysis Integer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. T. Srinivasagam ,
J. E. G. Raymont ,
C. F. Moodie  and
J. K. B. Raymont
R. T. Srinivasagam
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, The University, Southampton, England
J. E. G. Raymont
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, The University, Southampton, England
C. F. Moodie
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, The University, Southampton, England
J. K. B. Raymont
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, The University, Southampton, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The amino acid composition has been investigated in two euphausiids, Euphausia superba Dana and Meganyctiphanes norvegica (M. Sars), and one mysid, Neomysis integer Leach. Protein-bound amino acids show a very considerable degree of similarity: glutamic acid, aspartic acid, lysine, leucine and arginine are predominant in all three crustaceans, and occur in that order of importance. Together they amount to ~ 50% of the total protein hydrolysates. Concentrations of free amino acids show greater differences between the zooplankton species, but taurine, glycine and arginine are very important in all three. Lysine and ornithine occur in fair quantities in both euphausiids, and proline and alanine are moderately important in Euphausia superba and Neomysis integer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , November 1971 , pp. 917 - 925
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burkholder, P. K. Mandelli, E. F. & Centeno, P. 1967. Some chemical properties of Munida gregaria and Euphausia superba. J. agric. Fd Chem., Vol. 15, pp. 718–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camien, M. M. Sarlet, H. Duchateau, G. & Florkin, M. 1951. Non-protein aminoacids in muscle and blood of marine and fresh water Crustacea. J. biol. Chem., Vol. 193, pp. 881–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowey, C. B. & Corner, E. D. S. 1963. Amino acids and some other nitrogenous compounds in Calanus finmarchicus. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 485–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folch, J. Lees, M. & Sloane-Stanley, G. H. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissue. J. biol. Chem., Vol. 226, pp. 497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. R. 1969. Free amino acid and haemolymph concentration changes in Sphaeroma rugicauda (Isopoda) during adaptation to a dilute salinity. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 50, pp. 319–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kermack, W. O. Lees, H. & Wood, J. D. 1955. Some non-protein constituentsof the tissues of the lobster. Biochem. J., Vol. 60, pp. 424–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockwood, A. P. M. 1968. Aspects of the Physiology of Crustacea. 328 pp. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Moiseev, P. A. 1970. Some aspects of the commercial use of krill resources of the Antarctic Seas. Antarctic Ecology, Vol. 1 (ed. M. W. Holdgate), pp. 213–16. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Parvin, R. Pande, S. V. & Venkitasubramanian, T. A. 1965. On the colorimetric biuret method of protein determination. Analyt. Biochem., Vol. 12, pp. 219–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raymont, J. E. G. Austin, J. & Linford, E. 1964. Biochemical studies on marine zooplankton. I. The biochemical composition of Neomysis integer. J. cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 28, pp. 354–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymont, J. E. G. Austin, J. & Linford, E. 1966. Biochemical studies on marine zooplankton.III. Seasonal variation in the biochemical composition of Neomysis integer. In Some Contemporary Studies in Marine Science (ed. H. Barnes), pp. 597–605. London: George Allen and Unwin, Ltd.Google Scholar
Raymont, J. E. G. Austin, J. & Linford, E. 1967. Biochemical composition of certain oceanic zooplanktonic decapods. Deep-Sea Res., Vol. 14, pp. 113–15:Google Scholar
Raymont, J. E. G. Austin, J. & Linford, E. 1968. Biochemical studies on marine zooplankton. V. The composition of the major biochemical fractions in Neomysis integer. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 48, pp. 735–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymont, J. E. G. Srinivasagam, R. T. & Raymont, J. K. B. 1969a. Biochemicalstudies on marine zooplankton. VI. Investigations on Meganyctiphanes norvegica (M. Sars). Deep-Sea Res., Vol. 16, pp. 141–56.Google Scholar
Raymont, J. E. G. Srinivasagam, R. T. & Raymont, J. K. B. 1969b. Biochemicalstudies on marine zooplankton. VII. Observations on certain deep sea zooplankton. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr., Vol. 54, pp. 357–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymont, J. E. G. Srinivasagam, R. T. & Raymont, J. K. B. 1971a. Biochemical studies on marine zooplankton. VIII. Further investigations on Meganyctiphanes norvegica (M. Sars). Deep-SeaRes. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Raymont, J. E. G. Srinivasagam, R. T. & Raymont, J. K. B. 1971b. Biochemical studies on marine zooplankton. IX. The biochemical composition of Euphausia superba Dana. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 51, pp. 581–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidhu, G. S. Montgomery, W. A. Holloway, G. L. Johnson, A. R. & Walker, D. M. 1970. Biochemical composition and nutritive value of krill (Euphausia superba Dana). J. Sci. Fd Agric, Vol. 21, pp. 293–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suyama, M. Nakajima, K. & Nonaka, J. 1965. Studies on the protein and non-protein nitrogenous constituents of Euphausia. Bull. jap. Soc. Scient. Fish., Vol. 31, pp. 302–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar