Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T03:19:21.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behaviour of Chilean and Peale's dolphins in southern Chile: interspecific variability of sympatric species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2014

Francisco A. Viddi  and
Robert G. Harcourt
Francisco A. Viddi*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas, Universidad Austral de Chile, casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile Graduate School of the Environment, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Robert G. Harcourt
Affiliation:
Graduate School of the Environment, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to:F. Viddi, Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas, Universidad Austral de Chile, casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile email: fviddi@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Assessing the behavioural patterns of animals is an increasingly important field in conservation biology, as it may assist in the prediction of how animals respond to rapid changes in the environment. Comparing the behavioural patterns of sympatric species can also give insights into the mechanisms that allow similar species to coexist. We undertook dolphin group follows in order to quantify the behavioural patterns of the sympatric Chilean and Peale's dolphins in southern Chile. Markov chains showed that these species differed significantly in time allocated to each of the five different behavioural states, but travelling was the most frequent behavioural state observed for both species. Six (out of 25) behavioural transitions were found to be different between species. In addition, group size and group dispersion were highly associated with specific behavioural states. Larger groups were more likely to socialize, while small groups were more likely to rest. For both species resting was mostly observed in tight groups, while foraging/feeding and travelling were related to intermediate group dispersion. Socializing differed between species, occurring in tight groups for Peale's dolphins and dispersed groups for Chilean dolphins. Overall, there were significant differences in behavioural patterns between the two species. These dissimilarities may represent evidence of different strategies (i.e. habitat use patterns and foraging) these two species employ which allow them to coexist. The information generated in this study will contribute to the development of better predictive models on how animals may respond to a changing environment and to the potential effects of human induced activities.

Keywords

dolphin sympatrybehavioural patternsnorthern Patagonian fjordsMarkov chains
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 96 , Issue 4: Marine Mammals , June 2016 , pp. 915 - 923
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, D., Bowen, W.D., McMillan, J.I. and Iverson, S.J. (2006) Linking movement, diving, and habitat to foraging success in a large marine predator. Ecology 87, 3095–3108.Google Scholar
Baird, R.W. and Dill, L.M. (1996) Ecological and social determinants of group size in transient killer whales. Behavioral Ecology 7, 408–416.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, G.A. (1970) A model for the evolution of pinniped polygymy. Evolution 24, 546–559.Google Scholar
Bearzi, G., Politi, E. and Di Sciara, G.N. (1999) Diurnal behavior of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins in Kvarnerić (Northern Adriatic Sea). Marine Mammmal Science 15, 1065–1097.Google Scholar
Bergman, C.M., Schaefer, J.A. and Luttich, S.N. (2000) Caribou movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia 123, 364–374.Google Scholar
Caro, T.M. (1998) Behavioural ecology and conservation biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, H. (2001) Matrix populaiton models. 2nd edition. Boston: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Connor, R.C. (2002) Ecology of group living and social behaviour. In Hoelzel, A.R. (ed. [(ed.)]) Marine mammal biology: an evolutionary approach. Oxford: Blackwell Science, pp. 353–370.Google Scholar
Cruz-Rivera, E. and Hay, M.E. (2000) Can quantity replace quality? Food choice, compensatory feeding, and fitness of marine mesograzers. Ecology 81, 201–219.Google Scholar
Dans, S.L., Crespo, E.A., Pedraza, S.N. and Degrati, M. (2008) Dusky dolphin and tourist interaction: effect on diurnal feeding behavior. Marine Ecology Progress Series 369, 287–296.Google Scholar
Dans, S.L., Degrati, M., Pedraza, S.N. and Crespo, E.A. (2012) Tour boats effects on dolphins behavior: a sensitivity analysis applied to Markov chains. Conservation Biology 26, 708–716.Google Scholar
Degrati, M., Dans, S.L., Pedraza, S.N., Crespo, E.A. and Garaffo, G.V. (2008) Diurnal behavior of dusky dolphins, Lagenorhynchus obscurus, in Golfo Nuevo, Argentina. Journal of Mammalogy 89, 1241–1247.Google Scholar
Degrati, M., Dans, S.L., Garaffo, G.V. and Crespo, E.A. (2012) Diving for food: a switch of foraging strategy for dusky dolphins in Argentina? Journal of Ethology 30, 361–367.Google Scholar
Dingle, H., Carroll, S.P. and Loye, E. (1997) Conservation, behavior, and 99% of the world's biodiversity: is our ignorance really bliss? In Clemmon, J. and Buchholz, R. (eds) Behavioral approaches to conservation in the wild. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 72–92.Google Scholar
Doran, D. (1997) Influence of seasonality on activity patterns, feeding behavior, ranging, and grouping patterns in Taï chimpanzees. International Journal of Primatology 18, 183–206.Google Scholar
Estes, J.A., Jameson, R.J. and Rhode, E.B. (1982) Activity and prey election in the sea otter: influence of population status on community structure. American Naturalist 120, 242–258.Google Scholar
Ewald, P.W. and Bransfield, R.J. (1987) Territory quality and territorial behavior in two sympatric species of hummingbirds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 20, 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, R.N.P. (1994) Chilean dolphins Cephalorhynchus eutropia (Gray, 1846). In Ridgway, S.H. and Harrison, S.R. (eds) Handbook of marine mammals. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 269–287.Google Scholar
Goodall, R.N.P., De Haro, J.C., Fraga, F., Iniguez, M.A. and Norris, K.S. (1997) Sightings and behaviour of Peale's dolphins, Lagenorhynchus australis, with notes on dusky dolphins, L. obscurus, off southernmost South America. Report of the International Whaling Commission 47 (special issue), 757–775.Google Scholar
Hall, M., Halliday, T., MacLannahan, H., Toates, F. and Whatson, T. (1998) Behavoiur and evolution. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Hammond, P.S., Bearzi, G., Bjørge, A., Forney, K., Karczmarski, L., Kasuya, T., Perrin, W.F., Scott, M.D., Wang, J.Y., Wells, R.S. and Wilson, B. (2008) Lagenorhynchus australis. In IUCN 2009 (ed.) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.1. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 4 February 2014).Google Scholar
Hansen, L. and Defran, R.H. (1993) The behaviour and feeding ecology of the Pacific coast bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus. Aquatic Mammals 19, 127–142.Google Scholar
De Haro, J.C. and Iñiguez, M. (1997) Ecology and behavior of the Peale's dolphin, Lagenorhynchus australis (Peale, 1848), at Cabo Virgenes (52 30′S, 68 28′W), in Patagonia, Argentina. Report of the International Whaling Commission 47 (special issue), 723 –727.Google Scholar
Heinrich, S. (2006) Ecology of Chilean dolphins and Peale's dolphins at Isla Chiloe, southern Chile. PhD thesis. University of St Andrews, UK.Google Scholar
Heithaus, M. and Dill, L.M. (2002) Food availability and tiger shark predation risk influence bottlenose dolphin habitat use. Ecology 83, 480–491.Google Scholar
Hucke-Gaete, R., Viddi, F.A. and Bello, M.E. (2006) Marine conservation in southern Chile: the importance of the Chiloe—Corcovado area for blue whales, biological diversity and sustainable development. Valdivia: Imprenta America.Google Scholar
Karczmarski, L. and Cockcroft, V.G. (1999) Daylight behavior of humpback dolphins Sousa chinensis in Algoa Bay, South Africa. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 64, 19–20.Google Scholar
Karczmarski, L., Würsig, B., Gailey, G., Larson, K.W. and Vanderlipb, C. (2005) Spinner dolphins in a remote Hawaiian atoll: social grouping and population structure. Behavioral Ecology 16, 675–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, P.C. (1994) Social structure and evolution. In Slater, P.J.B. and Halliday, T. (eds) Behaviour and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 266–303.Google Scholar
Lehner, P.N. (1996) Handbook of ethological methods. 2nd edition.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lescrauwaet, A.K. (1997) Notes on the behaviour and ecology of the Peale's dolphin Lagenorhynchus australis, in the Strait of Magellan, Chile. Report of the International Whaling Commission 47 (special issue), 747–755.Google Scholar
Lusseau, D. (2003) Effects of tour boats on the behavior of bottlenose dolphins: using Markov chains to model anthropogenic impacts. Conservation Biology 17, 1785–1793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusseau, D., Bain, D.E., Williams, R. and Smith, J.C. (2009) Vessel traffic disrupts the foraging behavior of southern resident killer whales Orcinus orca. Endangered Species Research 6, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusseau, D., Williams, R., Wilson, B., Grellier, K., Barton, T.R., Hammond, P.S. and Thompson, P.M. (2004) Parallel influence of climate on the behaviour of Pacific killer whales and Atlantic bottlenose dolphins. Ecology Letters 7, 1068–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, J. (1999) Behavioral sampling methods for cetacean: a review and critique. Marine Mammal Science 15, 102–122.Google Scholar
Mann, J., Connor, R.C., Barre, L.M. and Heithaus, M.R. (2000) Female reproductive success in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.): life history, habitat portioning, and groupsize effects. Behavioral Ecology 11, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mårell, A., Ball, J.P. and Hofgaard, A. (2002) Foraging and movement trajectories of female reindeer: insights from fractal analysis, correlated random walks and Lévy flights. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80, 854–865.Google Scholar
Markowitz, T. (2004) Social organization of the New Zealand dusky dolphin. PhD thesis. Texas A&M University, USA.Google Scholar
Martin, P. and Bateson, P. (1993) Measuring behaviour. An introductory guide. 2nd editionCambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newcombe, R.G. (1998) Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Statistics in Medicine 17, 873–890.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, E.T. (1983) Relation of behavioral activity rhythms to the changes of day and night. A revision of views. Behaviour 89, 147–173.Google Scholar
Parra, G.J. (2006) Resource partitioning in sympatric delphinids: space use and habitat preferences of Australian snubfin and Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins. Journal of Animal Ecology 75, 862–874.Google Scholar
Parrish, J.K. (2005) Behavioral approaches to marine conservation. In Norse, E.A. and Crowder, L.B. (eds) Marine conservation biology. Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 80–104.Google Scholar
Perri, L.M. and Randall, J.A. (1999) Behavioral mechanisms of coexistence in sympatric species of desert rodents, Dipodomys ordii and D. merriami. Journal of Mammalogy 80, 1297–1310.Google Scholar
Quinn, G.P. and Keough, M.J. (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2.9.1. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, available at: http://www.R-project.org (accessed 4 February 2014).Google Scholar
Reeves, R.R., Crespo, E.A., Dans, C., Jefferson, T.A., Karczmarski, L., Laidre, K., O'Corry-Crowe, G., Pedraza, S., Rojas-Bracho, L., Secchi, E.R., Slooten, E., Smith, B.D., Wang, J. and Zhou, K. (2008) Cephalorhynchus eutropia. In IUCN 2009 (ed.) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.1. Available at www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 4 February 2014).Google Scholar
Ribeiro, S., Viddi, F.A., Cordeiro, J.L. and Freitas, T.R.O. (2007) Fine-scale habitat selection of Chilean dolphins (Cephalorhynchus eutropia): interactions with aquaculture activities in southern Chiloé Island, Chile. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87, 119–128.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, S., Viddi, F.A. and Freitas, T.R.O. (2005) Behavioural responses by Chilean dolphins (Cephalorhynchus eutropia) to boats in Yaldad bay, southern Chile. Aquatic Mammals 31, 234–242.Google Scholar
Shane, S.H. (1990) Comparison of bottlenose dolphin behavior in Texas and Florida, with a critique of methods for studying dolphin behavior. In Leatherwood, S. and Reeves, R.R. (eds) The bottlenose dolphin. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 541–558.Google Scholar
Stevick, P.T., McConnell, B.J. and Hammond, P.S. (2002) Patterns of movement. In Hoelzel, A.R. (ed.) Marine mammal biology: an evolutionary approach. Cambridge: Blackwell Science, pp.185–216.Google Scholar
Viddi, F.A. (2009) Behavioural ecology of small cetaceans in the Northern Patagonian fjords, Chile. PhD thesis. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Viddi, F.A., Harcourt, R.G., Hucke-Gaete, R. and Field, I.C. (2011) Fine-scale movement patterns of the sympatric Chilean and Peale's dolphins in the Northern Patagonian fjords, Chile. Marine Ecology Progress Series 436, 245–256.Google Scholar
Viddi, F.A., Hucke-Gaete, R., Torres-Florez, J.P. and Ribeiro, S. (2010) Spatial and seasonal variability in cetacean distribution in the fjords of northern Patagonian, Chile. ICES Journal of Marine Science 67, 959–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viddi, F.A. and Lescrauwaet, A.K. (2005) Insights on habitat selection and behavioural patterns of Peale's dolphins (Lagenorhynchus australis) in the Strait of Magellan, southern Chile. Aquatic Mammals 31, 176–183.Google Scholar
Wells, R.S., Boness, D.J. and Rathbun, G.B. (1999) Behavior. In Reynolds III, J.E. and Rommel, S.A. (eds) Biology of marine mammals. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, pp. 324–422.Google Scholar
Whitehead, H. (2004) The group strikes back: follow protocols for behavioral research on cetaceans. Marine Mammal Science 20, 664–670.Google Scholar
Würsig, B. (1986) Delphinid foraging strategies. In Schuster, R., Thomas, J. and Wood, F. (eds) Dolphin cognition and behavior: a comparative approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 347–360.Google Scholar