Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T14:22:12.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temporal Variations in Annual Production and Biomass in Estuarine Populations of two Polychaetes, Nephtys Hombergi and Ampharete Acutifrons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. Price
Affiliation:
Institute for Marine Environmental Research, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth
R. M. Warwick
Affiliation:
Institute for Marine Environmental Research, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth

Extract

Production rates and production/biomass ratios have been estimated for a large number of macrobenthic species (Hargrave, 1977; Robertson, 1979). The usefulness of such estimates is limited by a lack of information on their temporal and spatial stability; we are aware of only one study (Sarvala, 1980) in which production has been estimated for more than one year. The present study investigates the stability of the production (P), biomass (B) and P/B values of two polychaete species, Nephtys hombergi Savigny and Ampharete acutifrons (Grube), over a 5-year period.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crisp, D. J., 1971. Energy flow measurements. In Methods for the Study of Marine Benthos (ed. Holme, N. A. and Mclntyre, A. D.), pp. 197323. Oxford: Blackwell. [IBP Handbook no. 16.]Google Scholar
Green, R. H., 1969. Population dynamics and environmental variability. American Zoologist, 9, 393398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargrave, B., 1977. Benthic communities. In Biological Oceanographic Processes, 2nd ed. (ed. Parsons, T. R., Takahashi, M. and Hargrave, B.), pp. 176264. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Macarthur, R. H., 1955. Fluctuations of animal populations, and a measure of community stability. Ecology, 36, 533536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalef, R., 1963. On certain unifying principles in ecology. American Naturalist, 97, 357374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, P. G., 1977. Organization in simple communities: observations on the natural history of Hyale nilssoni (Amphipoda) in high littoral seaweeds. In Biology of Benthic Organisms (ed. Keegan, B. F., Céidigh, P. Ó. and Boaden, P. J. S.), pp. 443451. Oxford: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, W. N. & Oaten, A., 1975. Predation and population stability. Advances in Ecological Research, 9, 1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olive, P. J. W., 1977. The life-history and population structure of the polychaetes Nephtys caeca and Nephtys hombergii with special reference to the growth rings in the teeth. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 57, 133150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. I., 1979. The relationship between annual production: biomass ratios and lifespans for marine macrobenthos. Oecologia, 38, 193202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarvala, J., 1980. Production of Harmothoe sarsi (Polychaeta) at a soft bottom locality near Tvarminne, southern Finland. Prace Morskiego instytutu rybackiego w Gydni. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates. Meddelelser fra Kotnmissionen for Danmarks Fiskeri- og Havundersegelser (ser. Plankton), 4, 523 pp.Google Scholar
Warwick, R. M. & George, C. L., 1980. Annual macrofauna production in an Abra community. In Problems of an Industrialized Embayment: Swansea Bay. Oxford: Pergamon Press. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Warwick, R. M., Joint, I. R. & Radford, P. J., 1979. Secondary production of the benthos in an estuarine environment. In Ecological Processes in Coastal Environments (ed. Jeffries, R. L. and Davy, A. J.), pp. 429450. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Warwick, R. M. & Price, R., 1975. Macrofauna production in an estuarine mud-flat. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar