Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T05:40:51.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on Marine Flagellates VII. Nephroselmis Gilva Sp.Nov. and Some Allied Forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

M. Parke  and
D. G. Rayns
M. Parke
Affiliation:
The Plymouth Laboratory
D. G. Rayns
Affiliation:
Botany Department, The University, Leeds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A new species provisionally attributed to the genus Nephroselmis has been described with the aid of light- and electron-microscopy. Significant features include the presence of a single layer of scales over the flagellar and cell surfaces as in Micromonas squamata Manton & Parke, though the morphology of the flagellar scales is as in the outer scale layer of Pyramimonas and Halosphaera. Reasons are given for rejection of Thalassomonas on the grounds of nomen confusum and for homologizing various representatives of it with Micromonas squamata.

Some additional facts about the latter include details of the imbrication of the flagellar scales and demonstration, made possible by the use of lead staining of sections, of a close association between golgi bodies and the scale-producing vesicles.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , February 1964 , pp. 209 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butcher, R. W., 1959. An introductory account of the smaller algae of the British coastal waters. Part I. Introduction and Chlorophyceae. Fish. Invest. Lond., Ser. 4, 74 pp.Google Scholar
Carter, N., 1937. New or interesting algae from brackish water. Arch. Protistenk., Bd. 90, pp. 1–68.Google Scholar
Chadefaud, M., 1960. ‘Les végétauxnon vasculaires (Cryptogamie)’ in Chadefaud, M. et Emberger, L., Traité de Botanique, Systématique, T. I, 1018 pp.Google Scholar
Christensen, T., 1962. Alger. In Böcher, T. W., Lange, M. & Sørensen, T., Botanik, Bd. 2 (Systematisk Botanik), Nr. 2, 178 pp.Google Scholar
Korshikov, A., 1923. Protochlorinae, eine neue Gruppe der grünen Flagellata. Arch, russes Protist., Bd. 2, pp. 148–69.Google Scholar
Manton, I., Oates, K. & Parke, M., 1963. Observations on the fine structure of the Pyramimonas stage of Halosphaera and preliminary observations on three species of Pyramimonas. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 225–38.Google Scholar
Manton, I. & Parke, M., 1960. Further observations on small green flagellates with special reference to possible relatives of Chromulina pusilla Butcher. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 39, pp. 275–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, J., 1925. Die planktonischen Vegetationen des adriatischen Meeres. B. Chrysomonadinae, Heterokontae, Cryptomonadinae, Eugleninae, Volvocales. I. Systematischer Teil. Arch. Protistenk., Bd. 53, pp. 59–123.Google Scholar
Senn, G., 1911. Oxyrrhis, Nephroselmis und einige Euflagellaten, nebst Bemerkungen über deren System. Z. wiss. Zool., Bd. 97, pp. 605–72.Google Scholar
Skuja, H., 1948. Taxonomie des Phytoplanktons einiger Seen in Uppland, Schweden. Symb. bot. upsaliens., Vol. 9, H. 3, 399 pp.Google Scholar
Stein, F. V., 1878. Der Organismus der Infusionstiere. Flagellaten. Abt. 3, H. 1, 154 pp. Leipzig.Google Scholar